Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 1: the reality according to policymakers.
about
A translational framework for public health researchHow effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventionsHow effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventionsNew directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literatureExtending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaborationDo evidence summaries increase policy-makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews: A systematic review protocolTaking knowledge users' knowledge needs into account in health: an evidence synthesis framework.A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakersAdvocacy for health equity: a synthesis review.Similarities and differences between stakeholders' opinions on using Health Technology Assessment (HTA) information across five European countries: results from the EQUIPT survey.The development of ORACLe: a measure of an organisation's capacity to engage in evidence-informed health policyThe effectiveness of evidence summaries on health policymakers and health system managers use of evidence from systematic reviews: a systematic reviewEvidence for Health III: Making evidence-informed decisions that integrate values and contextDoes consideration and assessment of effects on health equity affect the conclusions of systematic reviews? A methodology studyTrading quality for relevance: non-health decision-makers' use of evidence on the social determinants of health"We're not short of people telling us what the problems are. We're short of people telling us what to do": an appraisal of public policy and mental healthProtocol for a mixed methods study investigating the impact of investment in housing, regeneration and neighbourhood renewal on the health and wellbeing of residents: the GoWell programme.HIV among immigrants living in high-income countries: a realist review of evidence to guide targeted approaches to behavioural HIV prevention.Protocol for the process evaluation of a complex intervention designed to increase the use of research in health policy and program organisations (the SPIRIT study).Evaluating and Using Observational Evidence: The Contrasting Views of Policy Makers and Epidemiologists.Reversing the pipeline? Implementing public health evidence-based guidance in english local governmentSustained impact of community-based physical activity interventions: key elements for successPsychosocial risk factors in home and community settings and their associations with population health and health inequalities: a systematic meta-review.Planning ahead in public health? A qualitative study of the time horizons used in public health decision-making.National policy-makers speak out: are researchers giving them what they need?Perspectives on econometric modelling to inform policy: a UK qualitative case study of minimum unit pricing of alcoholEvaluation design for a complex intervention program targeting loneliness in non-institutionalized elderly Dutch peopleHealth inequalities in European cities: perceptions and beliefs among local policymakers.Development and formative evaluation of the e-Health Implementation Toolkit (e-HIT)An exploratory cluster randomised controlled trial of knowledge translation strategies to support evidence-informed decision-making in local governments (The KT4LG study)Stimulating the development of national Streptococcus suis guidelines in Viet Nam through a strategic research partnershipResearch and advice giving: a functional view of evidence-informed policy advice in a Canadian Ministry of Health.Competing for space in an already crowded market: a mixed methods study of why an online community of practice (CoP) for alcohol harm reduction failed to generate interest amongst the group of public health professionals at which it was aimed.The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review.Knowledge in process? Exploring barriers between epidemiological research and local health policy development.Paradoxes in self-evaluated health data in a developing country.Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventionsDevelopment and evaluation of 'briefing notes' as a novel knowledge translation tool to aid the implementation of sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews: a pilot studyPRISMA-Equity 2012 extension: reporting guidelines for systematic reviews with a focus on health equity.Systematic reviews need to consider applicability to disadvantaged populations: inter-rater agreement for a health equity plausibility algorithm.
P2860
Q21257207-A5B67A29-0F4B-4537-8D78-966856553B84Q24235824-E95F7F21-315B-4D2C-87A0-255E9007B49EQ24240948-674B735E-B8D5-487F-BA33-0FE896E7AEFDQ24810405-167811D9-A984-4E96-AEAF-6C190150A911Q26785694-20C8BE22-CE22-4345-9B9A-1F172DCA4FFFQ26786551-3569979B-2328-4796-9BCF-8DD1252E07E0Q26795672-19A72AE4-9D36-496E-8EB8-D40B5CCBAB0CQ26827309-CB3953B2-3053-4FC0-A924-799241A961D6Q26864224-BC1D01F9-3E4B-49BE-86DE-AEE8CD673754Q27303775-93A1D90B-71D0-456D-95BF-528AFB3EFDF0Q27303852-A8915774-B0B0-4DDF-AB7E-3A8CE9D5FAA3Q28066023-DCFAA419-F97F-4A40-B486-D7CFD88312D0Q28078924-1381DD56-8C25-4BC4-9F1B-BEB71B8447EEQ28731340-ED4D2B05-644C-40FF-B886-ED53526751F7Q30373354-AC6A9143-1D5F-4917-A029-ACE4430A460FQ30397887-9E7C67C7-726A-4C30-8FE1-CBF4165E9243Q30494677-B80AB40C-6494-4044-B419-1F2F88E68397Q30531037-4E5B970D-B322-48F3-AE6F-484B4F4B7548Q30596833-F3A488F0-4456-4D37-ADF7-43CA31992012Q30830892-D651D98D-163F-45D7-BD50-4EEFC90E5682Q30849882-69B4EBCF-4EB4-4CFA-99FC-1D78F849277AQ31140239-584E0D96-57A5-4B1D-8F88-839EFADC749FQ33352301-3A07B0A5-673F-4382-A8B9-A8B12425BFC6Q33394356-A7AAB90F-2F74-4B42-92BD-0C847649BAB5Q33652305-E31CD855-4AC2-493C-BFB2-F339D6D18CDDQ33655826-178CDAF2-F775-4895-BE6B-448051849CD8Q33690885-1E66BBF4-7EB4-4F6C-A7E4-0773E2B126E4Q33691488-7CED28F1-867F-4A14-BDB7-89D84B57E41AQ33721464-702ACF5B-1311-43AB-8088-7DBD6AACE99AQ33791416-D8BCB8FD-CCA5-4059-9730-CFDE3DE20699Q33883703-82E0C91A-637B-4CDD-BD5D-AC21CB5CF581Q33922639-F4FB9CB8-1A10-498A-A6A2-81F08DB5E865Q33922670-57BDFA06-1B85-4BBC-B83D-C467FB756814Q33982928-C028B0D1-F82A-408D-B03C-560CBD7A6552Q34198642-AA7BABBE-9BB2-460E-984B-EECD514B97A5Q34280146-D880205F-CFFA-4922-8F04-3381CC225652Q34297080-B8F95036-4D27-47B2-82AF-285B851B1712Q34456027-BC24A16E-BE2E-4A37-A6B3-AEA4FBEC72A5Q34504199-732B7970-C4D8-43DB-A200-F18F47CF2A38Q34518266-F2399CE9-4E83-44CB-879E-E8A92AA32847
P2860
Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 1: the reality according to policymakers.
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年論文
@yue
2004年論文
@zh-hant
2004年論文
@zh-hk
2004年論文
@zh-mo
2004年論文
@zh-tw
2004年论文
@wuu
2004年论文
@zh
2004年论文
@zh-cn
name
Evidence for public health pol ...... ity according to policymakers.
@ast
Evidence for public health pol ...... ity according to policymakers.
@en
type
label
Evidence for public health pol ...... ity according to policymakers.
@ast
Evidence for public health pol ...... ity according to policymakers.
@en
prefLabel
Evidence for public health pol ...... ity according to policymakers.
@ast
Evidence for public health pol ...... ity according to policymakers.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Evidence for public health pol ...... ity according to policymakers.
@en
P2093
Hilary Graham
Margaret Whitehead
Sally J Macintyre
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/JECH.2003.015289
P577
2004-10-01T00:00:00Z