Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures.

Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35574457

about

Intramedullary nails for extracapsular hip fractures in adults Use of the Gamma3™ nail in a teaching hospital for trochanteric fractures: mechanical complications, functional outcomes, and quality of life.Is helical blade superior to screw design in terms of cut-out rate for elderly trochanteric fractures? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Improved lag screw positioning in the treatment of proximal femur fractures using a novel computer assisted surgery method: a cadaveric study.Retention of a well-fixed acetabular component in the setting of acetabular osteolysis Outcome of the dynamic helical hip screw system for intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly patients.A review of tip apex distance in dynamic hip screw fixation of osteoporotic hip fractures.Does bone compaction around the helical blade of a proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) decrease the risk of cut-out?: A subject-specific computational study.Unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures: is there a consensus on definition and treatment in Germany?Intramedullary osteosynthesis versus plate osteosynthesis in subtrochanteric fractures.Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods.Comparison of Second and Third-Generation Nails in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture: Screws versus Helical Blades.Comment on Stern et al.: Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures.Treatment of trochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation or dynamic hip screw systems: a meta-analysis.Reply to the comments of Kancherla et al. to the article: Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures.A Comparison of the Clinico-Radiological Outcomes with Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) and Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) in Fixation of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures.Treatment With Helical Blade Cephalomedullary Nail for Two-Part Basicervical Proximal Femoral Fracture in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study.Osteoporotic hip fractures: the burden of fixation failure.

P2860

Q24193652-101049AE-8134-41E9-BC40-49AF7A94B766 Q34486823-71B8C6E8-84B0-44D2-BB14-82B59CA2C633 Q35099243-31DF79B7-00C3-47DB-8536-62D0F97A1A2C Q35178874-B8427A0A-BF69-4FDC-8C18-4498E2337C1B Q35913973-56B9D91C-716E-4334-9C8F-56499153DEDC Q36687004-DA9BDFF2-8784-4F5C-8D8D-84877A471D33 Q36806141-ADA8DB5A-9740-4196-ADA0-D8A3C67BF8D7 Q36896316-4B12E85E-DB7D-45CF-9A95-6395F59AB3DC Q37072390-B88F2FF9-FD97-41A5-8109-6EA9BA1B03F8 Q38003610-9B3427F2-543D-4B86-A58D-3E2631425CCB Q38793817-46426596-2A3F-4597-8972-DBB0C516EF03 Q41810167-47F11C75-BB88-434E-BA06-A3CC782357FB Q43153137-E64DF7E8-0132-43B4-8817-54A1C4F0E951 Q43987443-0DFFCFDA-2AB4-4FF9-B9FB-73F6619A35C0 Q45763125-1837BFA4-99FD-4686-A4C6-E39F6D859FB2 Q48002579-8671789A-3482-4D2E-BD66-546D9185FBC5 Q48275198-6D855187-C5FF-4704-BAC2-3AB4DAECB861 Q52944708-4CFDAFC6-DEBA-4297-8778-1A05C1B28FB4

P2860

Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35574457

description

2011 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2011年の論文

@ja

2011年論文

@yue

2011年論文

@zh-hant

2011年論文

@zh-hk

2011年論文

@zh-mo

2011年論文

@zh-tw

2011年论文

@wuu

2011年论文

@zh

2011年论文

@zh-cn

name

Prospective randomised study c ...... energy trochanteric fractures.

@ast

Prospective randomised study c ...... energy trochanteric fractures.

@en

type

label

Prospective randomised study c ...... energy trochanteric fractures.

@ast

Prospective randomised study c ...... energy trochanteric fractures.

@en

prefLabel

Prospective randomised study c ...... energy trochanteric fractures.

@ast

Prospective randomised study c ...... energy trochanteric fractures.

@en

P1433

Q35574457-5A10A373-5E1D-4C0E-88C2-B6BCF92C9D59

P1476

Q35574457-20A6E891-2A9B-4C5A-8B8B-F4372A735CA4

P2093

Q35574457-244EE0E8-D869-487C-9CCB-ED6047254106

Q35574457-69276AF9-DD9F-4991-848C-F21E0897774F

Q35574457-95932156-6EFB-4FB1-A1FA-D987E2C653D8

Q35574457-BADBEDF7-3F59-4809-829B-3DE7F37F8732

Q35574457-ED9AAD08-51BA-4422-B80D-BAD4F4D55DCE

P2860

Q35574457-048FE7E8-EE90-4367-97EF-14E95845795D

Q35574457-09118336-76CE-4CA6-A33E-CF633C5ACD88

Q35574457-1B2E374F-4199-41B8-92C6-E9316A4AAE31

Q35574457-1CF96DC6-6078-478F-8B93-33FAFACAE9CE

Q35574457-1D7716C8-253E-4B72-A0C7-293B388774DB

Q35574457-225EC4E9-B7AF-465E-9EAD-9821172325CC

Q35574457-22D4BDB7-5491-4908-B3B7-74834BA135D1

Q35574457-27CDAAD8-712C-4D99-99B9-5AC13D0787D2

Q35574457-2817B864-0D8D-41D0-BA99-7342B1FBFD92

Q35574457-318A3185-139F-446A-B6E3-7A7160727471

P2888

Q35574457-D51DBFCF-8F6F-45C5-BEE3-241574392D95

P304

Q35574457-D01BAD59-A2BB-4332-81B6-D82D372CE945

P31

Q35574457-9E5E7713-7661-4DAB-BD08-BB2883736440

P356

Q35574457-E0296DA1-3D29-4104-AB0F-048FBCCCBDFD

P433

Q35574457-F468D3FD-A2F3-4C0A-A060-419A71A2E043

P478

Q35574457-E92F116F-02D1-4421-A0DE-8B9A807DF7AC

P577

Q35574457-AE236E2B-D856-4CFC-8EAA-B4231EF39209

P5875

Q35574457-C71FA9FC-473B-465F-8F9A-BBD7B8A82DEE

P698

Q35574457-C5865D77-602B-4547-B958-5BFC68B4EE88

P932

Q35574457-305EF3CC-C59F-40F1-8950-1463B838CD16

P356

S00264-011-1232-8

P1433

International Orthopaedics

P1476

Prospective randomised study c ...... energy trochanteric fractures.

@en

P2093

Anne Lübbeke

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Domizio Suva

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hermes Miozzari

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Pierre Hoffmeyer

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Richard Stern

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults

Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures.

Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of 937 patients.

Fracture and dislocation classification compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee.

Are there advances in the treatment of extracapsular hip fractures in the elderly?

Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database.

Accuracy of lag screw placement for the dynamic hip screw and the cephalomedullary nail.

Measuring tip-apex distance using a picture archiving and communication system (PACS).

Awareness of tip-apex distance reduces failure of fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hip.

The fixation and prognosis of trochanteric fractures. A randomized prospective controlled trial.

P2888

s00264-011-1232-8

P304

1855-1861

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S00264-011-1232-8

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

12

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

35

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2011-03-10T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

50349282

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

21387175

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

3224624

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string