Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

about

Long-acting beta2-agonists versus long-acting muscarinic antagonists in patients with stable COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

P2860

Q39400577-403F6C6F-B3EE-4A48-A62A-23303E4C63E2

P2860

Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35584046

description

2015 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2015年の論文

@ja

2015年論文

@yue

2015年論文

@zh-hant

2015年論文

@zh-hk

2015年論文

@zh-mo

2015年論文

@zh-tw

2015年论文

@wuu

2015年论文

@zh

2015年论文

@zh-cn

name

Comparison of clinical efficac ...... f randomized controlled trials

@ast

Comparison of clinical efficac ...... f randomized controlled trials

@en

type

Item

label

Comparison of clinical efficac ...... f randomized controlled trials

@ast

Comparison of clinical efficac ...... f randomized controlled trials

@en

prefLabel

Comparison of clinical efficac ...... f randomized controlled trials

@ast

Comparison of clinical efficac ...... f randomized controlled trials

@en

P1476

Comparison of clinical efficac ...... f randomized controlled trials

@en

P2093

Hye Yun Park

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

K C Carriere

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kwang Ha Yoo

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Min-Ji Kim

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Seong Yong Lim

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Seung Soo Sheen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Yeon-Mok Oh

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

Tiotropium versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

International variation in the prevalence of COPD (the BOLD Study): a population-based prevalence study

Efficacy of a new once-daily long-acting inhaled beta2-agonist indacaterol versus twice-daily formoterol in COPD.

Blinded 12-week comparison of once-daily indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD.

Interpreting thresholds for a clinically significant change in health status in asthma and COPD.

Indacaterol on dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

P304

e0119948

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

meta-analysis

P356

10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0119948

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

English

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

P577

2015-03-23T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

277580610

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

25799171

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

P932

4370711

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

about

P2860

P2860

Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P407

P433

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P698

P921

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P407

P433

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P698

P921

P932