A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis.
about
A computational model to generate simulated three-dimensional breast masses.Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial.A brief history of free-response receiver operating characteristic paradigm data analysisCorrelation of free-response and receiver-operating-characteristic area-under-the-curve estimates: results from independently conducted FROC∕ROC studies in mammography.Simulation of unequal-variance binormal multireader ROC decision data: an extension of the Roe and Metz simulation model.A marginal-mean ANOVA approach for analyzing multireader multicase radiological imaging data.Multireader multicase reader studies with binary agreement data: simulation, analysis, validation, and sizing.Diagnostic efficacy of handheld devices for emergency radiologic consultation.Diagnostic performance of a Near-Infrared Breast Imaging system as adjunct to mammography versus X-ray mammography alone.Multi-reader multi-case studies using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve as a measure of diagnostic accuracy: systematic review with a focus on quality of data reportingPower calculation for comparing diagnostic accuracies in a multi-reader, multi-test design.Non-contrast enhanced MRI for evaluation of breast lesions: comparison of non-contrast enhanced high spectral and spatial resolution (HiSS) images versus contrast enhanced fat-suppressed imagesGeneralized Roe and Metz receiver operating characteristic model: analytic link between simulated decision scores and empirical AUC variances and covariances.Classification of follicular lymphoma: the effect of computer aid on pathologists gradingMeasuring agreement between rating interpretations and binary clinical interpretations of images: a simulation study of methods for quantifying the clinical relevance of an observer performance paradigm.Satisfaction of search in multitrauma patients: severity of detected fractures.Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study.Verification of DICOM GSDF in complex backgrounds.Sample size tables for computer-aided detection studiesDifferentiation of ductal carcinoma in-situ from benign micro-calcifications by dedicated breast computed tomographyMulti-reader ROC studies with split-plot designs: a comparison of statistical methods.An analytic expression for the binormal partial area under the ROC curve.MR diagnosis of vertebral artery dissection: value of 3D time-of-flight and true fast imaging with steady-state precession fusion imaging.Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammographyCan use of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction reduce radiation dose in unenhanced head CT? An analysis of qualitative and quantitative image quality.Trend of contrast detection threshold with and without localizationRecent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysisA free-response evaluation determining value in the computed tomography attenuation correction image for revealing pulmonary incidental findings: a phantom study.Effect of reconstruction methods and x-ray tube current-time product on nodule detection in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom: A crossed-modality JAFROC observer study.Diagnostic value of the stand-alone synthetic image in digital breast tomosynthesis examinations.Modified ideal observer model (MIOM) for high-contrast and high-spatial resolution CT imaging tasks.A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Digital Tomosynthesis, Dual-Energy Radiography, and Conventional Chest Radiography for the Detection and Management of Pulmonary Nodules.Detection of experimentally induced root fractures on digital and conventional radiographs: an in vitro study.Performance comparison of single-view digital breast tomosynthesis plus single-view digital mammography with two-view digital mammography.Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis.Evaluation of three pneumothorax size quantification methods on digitized chest X-ray films using medical-grade grayscale and consumer-grade color displays.Nonparametric estimation receiver operating characteristic analysis for performance evaluation on combined detection and estimation tasks.The effects of ambient lighting in chest radiology reading roomsPower estimation for multireader ROC methods an updated and unified approach.
P2860
Q30419105-FC6E3302-B2AE-4B98-BE4B-2413E3C233A1Q30430929-8BFF34CA-D57F-42A1-97BF-4299782EFF02Q30435507-1AE74EC0-E9AA-4751-93AF-1B11AC3A0040Q30448753-4E69514A-D56C-4BBA-9326-5EBCEA7BF577Q30575939-F7847581-440F-4624-8EB8-A3D7F9FF01D8Q30666989-D36419CE-D1C5-451E-A5EF-B7536C851377Q30979438-8BEA2FE7-AEF6-4577-B0F1-25135CA5BF76Q33677637-BA6B6CE6-3A83-4D62-826A-35A68DE1A428Q34030538-0F4A2687-5914-4DF5-96E3-D046F1F02054Q34777048-35B1566E-F0DD-463C-99FF-00A6C9502067Q35009451-E1F701CA-71BB-48A8-A4D7-471C8DE38702Q35534834-E7336C56-DA80-4E6E-9830-4B51ACA48FC2Q35686832-F6261D0B-2596-4F23-B7D6-6BB2CF1142A3Q35881329-F1A7DCB6-BC8F-4ECA-95EE-1A81D3275548Q35961719-59E9E9F5-AE6F-4850-B5CC-B688B954A84CQ35994791-F3C0E0F4-913D-4ACD-819E-BFFA4A939A27Q36245440-7A472CEF-C136-456F-8158-EA7231236824Q36247572-F01DA3FE-5CE9-4BE2-9558-FA24301D268EQ36387440-B302F05D-349E-40CA-A97E-BAACFF1FEB1AQ36422251-6357150A-14BC-4FA8-876A-6253B9BF1E2CQ36467372-45E91D9F-2127-4D21-B94C-947C2870630EQ36469269-35A32E33-468E-47C6-861B-23B565132417Q36631544-25AD58C6-EE23-4A8B-9819-B07B236421C1Q37145973-77918AA8-40CC-455B-9426-6650F2284584Q37196406-2A048297-4202-4EFB-BF86-A02977C4D01FQ37300333-EAFEBD87-E8BC-42EF-967F-1910B1F2C35FQ37332202-30DAC21C-E2D9-451C-A928-91EADCA7CE2FQ37691466-82F9275F-B38D-4BDF-9E87-557B8D44F40BQ38402400-DA53B33A-E756-4C88-8D0C-83082938455AQ38622689-82996225-8D44-4AC7-AE21-BC312E00CCFAQ38732791-79D5944B-7902-4A36-9792-ED2D9AD4F510Q38851001-D29E8C02-8C88-4B79-894E-2ED07696B285Q38903518-ACF36ACD-7FBA-4274-AEC3-3CEC512F39D5Q40016402-3C29273B-0349-4A28-805B-EC97F308E27CQ40062830-E07D6723-762A-45CF-BE5F-696CCEF484A3Q40107590-C3E894F1-F912-4221-8067-C386ECB6C19DQ40145214-B5050B3D-3387-44D4-A833-2CC19CE7CE1BQ40755080-73B0D311-FC6F-441E-9DE6-54E433678973Q41866760-906784B1-B836-4482-A60A-1BE16CDDD491Q41876694-8FEFDBC7-789D-4C73-973F-85F4497B847D
P2860
A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom methods for multiple observer ROC analysis.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
2007年论文
@zh
2007年论文
@zh-cn
name
A comparison of denominator de ...... ultiple observer ROC analysis.
@ast
A comparison of denominator de ...... ultiple observer ROC analysis.
@en
type
label
A comparison of denominator de ...... ultiple observer ROC analysis.
@ast
A comparison of denominator de ...... ultiple observer ROC analysis.
@en
prefLabel
A comparison of denominator de ...... ultiple observer ROC analysis.
@ast
A comparison of denominator de ...... ultiple observer ROC analysis.
@en
P2860
P356
P1476
A comparison of denominator de ...... ultiple observer ROC analysis.
@en
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/SIM.2532
P407
P577
2007-02-01T00:00:00Z