Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.
about
Advances in laparoscopic urologic surgery techniquesThe novel laparoscopic training 3D model in urology with surgical anatomic remarks: Fresh-frozen cadaveric tissueTwo-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopy in surgical efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysisNon-technical skills in minimally invasive surgery teams: a systematic review.Laser visual guidance versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a randomized trial.Impact of Training on Three-Dimensional versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopic Systems on Acquisition of Laparoscopic Skills in Novices: A Prospective Comparative Pilot Study.The learning curves of robotic and three-dimensional laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer.Accuracy and inter-operator variability of small bowel length measurement at laparoscopy.3D Vision Provides Shorter Operative Time and More Accurate Intraoperative Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair Compared With 2D Vision.Laparoscopic hysterectomy in the overweight and obese: does 3D imaging make a change?Optimizing a living kidney donation program: transition to hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy and introduction of a passive polarizing three-dimensional display system.Recognition Accuracy Using 3D Endoscopic Images for Superficial Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Crossover Study.Case-matched study of short-term effects of 3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.Innovation in endocrine surgery: robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Meta-analysis and systematic literature review.The effects of laparoscopic graspers with enhanced haptic feedback on applied forces: a randomized comparison with conventional graspers.Three-dimensional (3D)- computed tomography bronchography and angiography combined with 3D-video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus conventional 2D-VATS anatomic pulmonary segmentectomy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.Highly immersive virtual reality laparoscopy simulation: development and future aspects.The impact of crosstalk on three-dimensional laparoscopic performance and workload.Faster acquisition of laparoscopic skills in virtual reality with haptic feedback and 3D vision.A Comparative Study of Generic Visual Components of Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Laparoscopic Images.[Specific complications of minimally invasive surgery].Training Performance of Laparoscopic Surgery in Two- and Three-Dimensional Displays.Impact of 3D in the training of basic laparoscopic skills and its transferability to 2D environment: a prospective randomized controlled trial.3D vs. 2D imaging in laparoscopic surgery-an advantage? Results of standardised black box training in laparoscopic surgery.Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional endoscopic-assisted thyroidectomy via the anterior chest approach: a preliminary report.Enhanced Visualization: From Intraoperative Tissue Differentiation to Augmented Reality.3D laparoscopic surgery: a prospective clinical trial.Recognition accuracy of tumor extent using a prototype 3D endoscope for superficial gastric tumor: an ex vivo crossover study.A randomised trial of observational learning from 2D and 3D models in robotically assisted surgeryTwo-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Laparoscopic Systems in Urology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
P2860
Q26748539-5ABC4EC3-7B72-43A4-BFC8-E140E3527911Q28069475-38D5A9B7-B8F4-4434-892A-9DF506A87D78Q30841171-05B83A84-5B96-4B37-BB27-D70FFFD103D0Q35986245-576CCFDE-CA39-47B1-A017-31DB982E25BFQ36055869-73219441-31DE-4C50-82EC-BDAFB2A12915Q37475475-F9179412-4497-4B74-8CE8-9A4026550F2AQ37514083-060025BC-44E5-4370-9D16-A156145927ACQ38837239-5B83AD17-41F1-47F8-B232-5AFAF74E183CQ39001477-58568D4B-27FF-435D-9647-521751219CDBQ39297332-E762C7A0-74EE-4A59-9B8E-76A47C31CB0CQ40553927-0CAC0739-1A3A-411B-BB3C-C8D71AFCD537Q40962409-6B57DD94-9575-4EC1-A4AB-B2724803A6C3Q42362957-594124DD-3B15-4DFF-8471-EA848116F2FFQ47135217-7C79F647-217E-4A82-917C-D482D3955F4FQ47142742-EFDC87DB-48AD-40BE-BEA6-B8E2D92DC51BQ47181024-449553F9-E63F-402D-91C5-B766B7F2516AQ47832859-EC039CE7-3045-4AE1-B254-DDC7B1C1F41DQ48141049-9B5AADA4-5654-4C8B-B3C0-F65E51C38C1CQ48337780-3FD82BE5-73B0-45C4-9609-686BDA413CF6Q49610595-20062D3D-503E-4EFE-9ABF-B8567826E65BQ50170197-9261CA3E-B4F7-418E-9F68-11604445D9AFQ50456169-2512DF14-308F-4B94-8B7E-37BE2004E688Q50502108-1D058332-8227-4A99-B067-1EDBFA85A225Q50567700-0298314F-A7C0-48C6-A583-9DA153923E44Q50851418-DD587920-40E7-4F27-B1C3-0CB532E3DE3DQ51733047-E3F37511-7C7B-4E18-A7A5-175383E6BF99Q55077430-C343FDB9-689D-478C-B212-57832D455A64Q55332163-268872E0-45B0-43B7-B175-CECAC83482CDQ57921603-207D4557-DC84-4B49-9405-56EFE954E601Q58745895-8EC75C34-7108-43A6-BD14-EBB2301F6918
P2860
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年論文
@yue
2015年論文
@zh-hant
2015年論文
@zh-hk
2015年論文
@zh-mo
2015年論文
@zh-tw
2015年论文
@wuu
2015年论文
@zh
2015年论文
@zh-cn
name
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.
@ast
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.
@en
type
label
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.
@ast
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.
@en
prefLabel
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.
@ast
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review
@en
P2093
Flemming Bjerrum
Lars Konge
Mona Meral Savran
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1007/S00464-015-4189-7
P407
P577
2015-04-04T00:00:00Z