Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study
about
Research ethics committees: agents of research policy?What is eHealth (5): a research agenda for eHealth through stakeholder consultation and policy context reviewEvaluation of 5536 patients treated in an integrative outpatient tinnitus treatment center-immediate effects and a modeling approach for sustainability.National Human Research Ethics: A Preliminary Comparative Case Study of Germany, Great Britain, Romania, and SwedenClinical governance and research ethics as barriers to UK low-risk population-based health research?A framework for research ethics review during public emergenciesVariation in recruitment across sites in a consent-based clinical data registry: lessons from the Canadian Stroke NetworkAn eight-year follow-up national study of medical school and general hospital ethics committees in Japan.Evaluating eHealth: undertaking robust international cross-cultural eHealth research.One stop or full stop? The continuing challenges for researchers despite the new streamlined NHS research governance processDevelopment and pilot of an internationally standardized measure of cardiovascular risk management in European primary care.Psychometric properties of the Confidence and Trust in Delivery Questionnaire (CTDQ): a pilot studyProcedure versus process: ethical paradigms and the conduct of qualitative research.Issues of informed consent for intrapartum trials: a suggested consent pathway from the experience of the Release trial [ISRCTN13204258].Ethical issues posed by cluster randomized trials in health research.Can we evaluate population screening strategies in UK general practice? A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing postal and opportunistic screening for genital chlamydial infection.The reform of UK research ethics committees: throwing the baby out with the bath water?The influence of doctor-patient and midwife-patient relationship in quality care perception of italian pregnant women: an exploratory study.In the lion's den? Experiences of interaction with research ethics committeesEvaluation of clinical innovation: a gray zone in the ethics of modern clinical practice?Reforming the oversight of multi-site clinical research: a review of two possible solutions.Researchers' perceptions of ethical challenges in cluster randomized trials: a qualitative analysis.Differences between research ethics committees.A novel framework for reflecting on the functioning of research ethics review panels.Sense and readability: participant information sheets for research studiesA relational ethical dialogue with research ethics committees.Consensus statement on genetic research in dementia.Trust and regulatory organisations: the role of local knowledge and facework in research ethics review.Older people in long-term care settings as research informants: ethical challenges.Ethical Process Reporting in Indian Dental Journals.Long-term follow-up for cardiovascular disease after chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy for breast cancer in an unselected population.Reforming research ethics committees.Ethics review in research: research governance also delays research.Ethics review in research: role of ethics committee review is interpreted widely.Ethics review in research: ethics committees are risk averse.Underlying Processes of an Inverted Personalization Effect in Multimedia Learning - An Eye-Tracking Study.Improving recruitment to healthcare research studies: clinician judgements explored for opting mental health service users out of the time to change viewpoint survey.Patients' preferences for post-treatment breast cancer follow-up in primary care vs. secondary care: a qualitative study.Ethical considerations in clinical trials: a critique of the ICH-GCP guideline.The practice of obtaining approval from medical research ethics committees: a comparison within 12 European countries for a descriptive study on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's dementia.
P2860
Q24815381-F02AB11C-7835-407F-9941-EA908808804BQ28768075-33390A5D-0547-4BC4-8C71-8C37506036D1Q30376546-CFB82A36-8C6F-40A9-A22A-C803732A8EBEQ30394152-8BA69637-C053-48E0-8833-2EA581E18FACQ30485236-E835F8E2-37D5-4C77-893B-D4E6DB385BADQ30496870-A420F84B-9923-453C-9FB7-8BA9F6E6CE61Q31041645-354AF86B-0C8F-4C49-9B25-8BDBE4151BFEQ33289257-72FED746-C05B-418F-9EE3-83C05C5A7A0DQ33503211-5FD7BE26-7F92-4509-9113-45AB6E9670CAQ33577444-B3A57BA1-B0B8-4F36-89A1-42DCB7A5103AQ33865199-87421F39-5F52-41D2-B781-456B70E08D24Q34400018-5F97CCB4-CADE-45E9-A232-E18CE992CB23Q34422884-E314DE30-79E8-4471-9EEB-A7D7EC39D88DQ34690719-A5A221D3-E21B-47A3-8956-84C35BCBF932Q35023625-3F561BE1-85E2-4997-8738-8DC5B3DD5622Q35418586-AC4B9307-A217-4207-86AC-F08E9D1CBC4EQ35430269-A95F174E-1CCB-4A30-8F89-050DAD129027Q35532882-FE399FCB-FB10-4591-8D54-A7B8AB9104A1Q35851348-84B0B1CF-705D-4517-BCE0-56182BD96630Q36293544-973B348F-708F-4D00-9451-B9A977D301E9Q36505143-26E309D4-F1E0-4D73-8871-D0F931793376Q36578480-294F185D-CFF1-46E6-95CE-E70540250A4EQ36711655-9433C3AC-E7AA-4CB0-8407-0B06661B19FEQ36749701-CE90FD75-5AE6-4BB6-A1D4-1946E3B3C10DQ36814913-9F22B5D8-8E52-461F-9E1B-8704F4798F45Q37084016-88AA6171-A7C5-4E36-B79C-67C60A653918Q37175965-F383AED4-BE38-4251-B26D-CCFD0537CF88Q38063223-274E2850-83DC-451E-ADA9-F0392114A924Q38077651-DD378C48-ECE8-47D7-B01B-DA06EDF7CA2FQ38603332-0DF53B9B-6E01-4F2B-A09D-98E35192A338Q39241736-D9B4E692-63F8-48B5-AF3D-5A4601A50181Q42976423-0AB848C0-4AF6-47B9-A411-F24188137762Q43204459-9615DC8C-E35B-4CFB-86EB-5380C239754CQ43204461-627CEFD7-9E74-4F49-8F67-39DEBC797AC5Q43204463-43319EF5-A5ED-435C-81E8-341E9ACC0B9CQ47560654-58BA8372-1AFC-4618-B9AF-89E43DA1C8C0Q47670218-96591253-7BE0-4F9D-A239-50592E320E5CQ47786780-83949A0E-F179-41D9-B9B1-9CDC2BBC5039Q48351212-139F1B50-3179-4526-A91E-2FCD26E8F0D1Q51933454-9243F43E-EC40-4283-ACF7-9A0E477F6132
P2860
Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年論文
@yue
2004年論文
@zh-hant
2004年論文
@zh-hk
2004年論文
@zh-mo
2004年論文
@zh-tw
2004年论文
@wuu
2004年论文
@zh
2004年论文
@zh-cn
name
Comparison of requirements of ...... -invasive interventional study
@ast
Comparison of requirements of ...... -invasive interventional study
@en
type
label
Comparison of requirements of ...... -invasive interventional study
@ast
Comparison of requirements of ...... -invasive interventional study
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of requirements of ...... -invasive interventional study
@ast
Comparison of requirements of ...... -invasive interventional study
@en
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Comparison of requirements of ...... -invasive interventional study
@en
P2093
Hilary Hearnshaw
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/BMJ.328.7432.140
P407
P577
2004-01-01T00:00:00Z