Effects of adjusting for instrumental variables on bias and precision of effect estimates.
about
Disease risk score as a confounder summary method: systematic review and recommendationsRecommendations for the Design and Analysis of Treatment Trials for Alcohol Use DisordersConstructing Causal Diagrams for Common Perinatal Outcomes: Benefits, Limitations and Motivating Examples with Maternal Antidepressant Use in PregnancyProblem drinking as a risk factor for tuberculosis: a propensity score matched analysis of a national survey.Evaluating performance of risk identification methods through a large-scale simulation of observational data.A Cautious Note on Auxiliary Variables That Can Increase Bias in Missing Data Problems.Generalizing Treatment Effect Estimates From Sample to Population: A Case Study in the Difficulties of Finding Sufficient Data.Propensity score methods for confounding control in nonexperimental researchPropensity scores for confounder adjustment when assessing the effects of medical interventions using nonexperimental study designs.Causal inference, probability theory, and graphical insights.Commentary: Balancing automated procedures for confounding control with background knowledgeInstrumental variable applications using nursing home prescribing preferences in comparative effectiveness researchThe role of prediction modeling in propensity score estimation: an evaluation of logistic regression, bCART, and the covariate-balancing propensity scoreReducing Bias Amplification in the Presence of Unmeasured Confounding Through Out-of-Sample Estimation Strategies for the Disease Risk Score.Combining directed acyclic graphs and the change-in-estimate procedure as a novel approach to adjustment-variable selection in epidemiology.Model Misspecification When Excluding Instrumental Variables From PS Models in Settings Where Instruments Modify the Effects of Covariates on TreatmentSuicide risk in Veterans Health Administration patients with mental health diagnoses initiating lithium or valproate: a historical prospective cohort studyInvited commentary: understanding bias amplificationOutcome modelling strategies in epidemiology: traditional methods and basic alternatives.Factors affecting time to maintenance dose in patients initiating warfarin.A simulation study on matched case-control designs in the perspective of causal diagrams.Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies.Role of disease risk scores in comparative effectiveness research with emerging therapiesVariable selection for propensity score models when estimating treatment effects on multiple outcomes: a simulation studyAmbient air pollution and traffic exposures and congenital heart defects in the San Joaquin Valley of California.A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted modelsOn the joint use of propensity and prognostic scores in estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated: a simulation study.A review of covariate selection for non-experimental comparative effectiveness research.Diagnostics for Confounding of Time-varying and Other Joint Exposures.Outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference.Estimating inverse probability weights using super learner when weight-model specification is unknown in a marginal structural Cox model context.The Potential of High-Dimensional Propensity Scores in Health Services Research: An Exemplary Study on the Quality of Care for Elective Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.Performance of the High-dimensional Propensity Score in a Nordic Healthcare Model.Risk of serious infections associated with use of immunosuppressive agents in pregnant women with autoimmune inflammatory conditions: cohort study.Outcome-wide Epidemiology.Short-term risk of liver and renal injury in hospitalized patients using micafungin: a multicentre cohort study.Regularized Regression Versus the High-Dimensional Propensity Score for Confounding Adjustment in Secondary Database Analyses.Evaluating possible confounding by prescriber in comparative effectiveness research.Increased Computed Tomography Utilization in the Emergency Department and Its Association with Hospital Admission.The ACCE method: an approach for obtaining quantitative or qualitative estimates of residual confounding that includes unmeasured confounding.
P2860
Q26999267-876E9E4C-06BE-45C0-9737-6F87829342B9Q27013929-A8120D6F-F13D-4CF4-AAAB-8AEB78C5E41DQ28385738-B7E6ACE2-9889-4898-927C-2BD4ED14204AQ30558762-36719737-A44A-4B23-89F4-223CBBCD31D1Q30685309-853ED111-2289-4CAC-B1DB-5E7CA6725C2AQ31035084-CBA0F257-91C2-40AF-A2FE-564DB4FD7C44Q31119659-B051DDCC-4663-4A34-B560-B38BF2B14AE7Q33654170-EA912D4D-BA4D-4150-B04B-F17BBD204C0AQ33680604-E6D6AAE4-F56F-483A-A025-5DBBD5971B69Q33812711-751144C8-7DBA-40C0-8C63-8657AB374083Q33949956-DC48356B-09D1-45A1-A1E0-789E45C47B9BQ33976565-D2FACBCA-D877-4CF6-AB12-BDE299BA38A1Q34149360-F6CE8A12-D7CA-46D6-9189-AB338B15508DQ34323908-B66242D9-71D7-4CE9-8B16-489FC0DB9922Q34443769-C67A0B12-30C7-4457-9EFE-5CC5A3E0F53CQ35056126-8B2769CA-19AB-4818-847E-A6B074F97325Q35129198-B4D94D9D-601C-41D5-80FA-4713E72783E9Q35573600-758D7CA7-E665-4E7B-A7C6-CC870DC5439DQ35995075-361B72EA-ABAD-4164-ACDA-7890EBD5724EQ36060109-DE5EA184-5466-4261-BE84-8DCD29278640Q36108391-91B28420-41BB-4301-806F-D979B24165FEQ36225803-45B1FB35-D4C2-4161-8146-B491DDB65D6FQ36266471-2BD472A1-645C-4A58-A99B-A399DACF0459Q36518198-30ECD23F-8603-4B71-A342-D8236EDE4965Q36960490-9B4560D5-1A6C-412E-9FC5-9A3F65F162F6Q37009694-A0EB0F79-734E-4DCE-BD4E-1002428B14AAQ37716995-D8EDF0F1-932A-4878-AA3C-2D64CBFD3A06Q38134365-D702B05E-95ED-43DC-BDF6-E61FCE5F7719Q38914972-92137310-EF76-47A9-8E88-0AB725E94E45Q38920544-BFE7A896-7867-44E8-9870-5768F9D9974AQ38951608-E46B09A5-4357-43A4-A07C-7E80C165D1A9Q39017554-65D3B9C4-690F-4DA6-A4FF-76DCFCC11591Q39151335-C4B30276-DA19-43D6-B8B2-0ECFAD11BC0BQ40305897-357FEAE8-870B-4659-87AD-384B59A73DA1Q40348086-4636678C-6FA6-4584-A722-55F574232EDEQ40615864-557C6284-8795-4DB2-9D3F-F9F6F568A5F3Q40669508-10954FE6-FBF1-422F-AA1E-0A4E5AE9E402Q41493372-4B280642-1940-4043-A33E-E6137C58C42BQ41560806-AD3E8C94-C503-4F63-8C7D-67DBFCC22DACQ41594205-7069B1B9-8483-4440-8147-0FAAC55A420E
P2860
Effects of adjusting for instrumental variables on bias and precision of effect estimates.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
2011年论文
@zh
2011年论文
@zh-cn
name
Effects of adjusting for instr ...... precision of effect estimates.
@ast
Effects of adjusting for instr ...... precision of effect estimates.
@en
type
label
Effects of adjusting for instr ...... precision of effect estimates.
@ast
Effects of adjusting for instr ...... precision of effect estimates.
@en
prefLabel
Effects of adjusting for instr ...... precision of effect estimates.
@ast
Effects of adjusting for instr ...... precision of effect estimates.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Effects of adjusting for instr ...... precision of effect estimates.
@en
P2093
Jeremy A Rassen
Jessica A Myers
Joshua J Gagne
Kenneth J Rothman
Krista F Huybrechts
Marshall M Joffe
Robert J Glynn
Sebastian Schneeweiss
P2860
P304
P356
10.1093/AJE/KWR364
P407
P577
2011-10-24T00:00:00Z