Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading of mammograms in breast cancer screening: findings of a systematic review.
about
Mammography screening in less developed countriesFrom randomized trials to the clinic: is it time to implement individual lung-cancer screening in clinical practice? A multidisciplinary statement from French experts on behalf of the French intergroup (IFCT) and the groupe d'Oncologie de langue fraCollective intelligence meets medical decision-making: the collective outperforms the best radiologistSecond opinion in breast pathology: policy, practice and perception.Computer-based detection and prompting of mammographic abnormalities.Cost-Effectiveness of Double Reading versus Single Reading of Mammograms in a Breast Cancer Screening Programme.Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammogramsProspective trial comparing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus combined FFDM and tomosynthesis in a population-based screening programme using independent double reading with arbitration.Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study.Performance of double reading mammography in an Iranian population and its effect on patient outcomeFoundation and methodologies in computer-aided diagnosis systems for breast cancer detection.Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection?Evaluation of the effect of double reporting on test accuracy in screening and diagnostic imaging studies: A review of the evidence.Double versus single reading of mammograms in a breast cancer screening programme: a cost-consequence analysis.Double reading rates and quality assurance practices in Norwegian hospital radiology departments: two parallel national surveys.Inter-observer variability in mammographic density assessment using Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) synoptic scales.Double reading of radiological examinations in Norway.Combining independent decisions increases diagnostic accuracy of reading lumbosacral radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging.Interpretation errors in CT angiography of the head and neck and the benefit of double reading.Screening for breast cancer
P2860
Q26778678-5EFC347B-A54C-4E55-B913-7C006E9DA77AQ30535897-2238DD51-F507-43A6-9BAE-C4DCDBC3E6E0Q35743909-62EADE19-9771-43BF-8A1B-2DA214254F02Q35905599-C656816A-0E8C-4B81-B8E2-99F77947F835Q36022697-10A4286A-21A3-4354-9CDA-1932BBD61256Q36086127-8F89EA03-C5D5-4A4E-A676-3B5A0B8AB95EQ36407013-A5B66127-9910-45EE-9139-5CD61C77E03CQ36983287-5440A6E9-D5BA-45EA-92B5-73483B40D276Q37028119-7A8ACF00-CC18-497B-84D0-C95C0E15F847Q37156025-DF9F00DF-D396-45E6-861C-8A69088A4C0DQ37736442-C7B3948B-7E92-4986-8EB4-6AD47153D995Q37979731-0ACEE134-3E03-4941-8184-94EF9BEFE34DQ38782332-7E922383-6CE2-4446-A143-47D17F11F3AEQ40127380-93745906-777B-4A35-BB89-78A58E6A8A09Q43924227-DC899CB6-FF48-465F-B850-E80F30E1422BQ46219002-7D1E1F4F-1BCC-4149-9206-A02898C8DB21Q51039359-6B89431E-B3FA-4F43-9581-2C056916D6CCQ52610200-F922B891-BE8B-4D36-A089-4D5FC64AFEC1Q53088776-CE9339BF-6D52-4EEB-B393-838270FF98AEQ57651645-E8CFFC8B-93BF-4756-A706-A9268C57B820
P2860
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of double reading of mammograms in breast cancer screening: findings of a systematic review.
description
2001 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2001年の論文
@ja
2001年論文
@yue
2001年論文
@zh-hant
2001年論文
@zh-hk
2001年論文
@zh-mo
2001年論文
@zh-tw
2001年论文
@wuu
2001年论文
@zh
2001年论文
@zh-cn
name
Effectiveness and cost-effecti ...... ndings of a systematic review.
@ast
Effectiveness and cost-effecti ...... ndings of a systematic review.
@en
type
label
Effectiveness and cost-effecti ...... ndings of a systematic review.
@ast
Effectiveness and cost-effecti ...... ndings of a systematic review.
@en
prefLabel
Effectiveness and cost-effecti ...... ndings of a systematic review.
@ast
Effectiveness and cost-effecti ...... ndings of a systematic review.
@en
P2093
P356
P1433
P1476
Effectiveness and cost-effecti ...... indings of a systematic review
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1054/BRST.2001.0350
P577
2001-12-01T00:00:00Z