about
Quantifying and adjusting for disease misclassification due to loss to follow-up in historical cohort mortality studiesMethods to explore uncertainty and bias introduced by job exposure matricesValidity of birth certificate-derived maternal weight data.Comparison of bias analysis strategies applied to a large data setValidity of birth certificate-derived maternal weight data in twin pregnancies.Misclassification in administrative claims data: quantifying the impact on treatment effect estimates.A comparison of sensitivity-specificity imputation, direct imputation and fully Bayesian analysis to adjust for exposure misclassification when validation data are unavailable.A comparison of Bayesian and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.Probabilistic bias analysis in pharmacoepidemiology and comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review.Cytochrome P-450 2D6 (CYP2D6) Genotype and Breast Cancer Recurrence in Tamoxifen-Treated Patients: Evaluating the Importance of Loss of Heterozygosity.On the Need for Quantitative Bias Analysis in the Peer-Review Process.A probabilistic bias analysis for misclassified categorical exposures, with application to oral anti-hyperglycaemic drugs.What do measures of agreement (κ) tell us about quality of exposure assessment? Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation.Bias analysis to improve monitoring an HIV epidemic and its response: approach and application to a survey of female sex workers in Iran.Presentation of study results: the authors' responsibility.Good practices for quantitative bias analysis.Importance of bias analysis in epidemiologic research.A commentary on 'A comparison of Bayesian and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding'.Applying quantitative bias analysis to estimate the plausible effects of selection bias in a cluster randomised controlled trial: secondary analysis of the Primary care Osteoarthritis Screening Trial (POST).Hierarchical semi-Bayes methods for misclassification in perinatal epidemiology.The Harm Done to Reproducibility by the Culture of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing.Good Practices for Observational Studies of Maternal Weight and Weight Gain in Pregnancy.
P2860
Q23916708-B0102266-D052-46F1-8DDA-129726A7182FQ28950757-14809820-AFB3-4F39-AC9B-EB6D95732200Q30786765-9ADC55DB-DD7E-4C9A-B18A-8599423F32E6Q30818427-378ED045-19ED-4CB5-A785-3A6B72E0D6A5Q30880769-66E63647-A965-4954-A786-9596107B06F2Q30974376-97721B90-A7BB-444F-8588-024DEA24CA21Q36321898-E4F1B748-4381-47D6-B06E-14DC5CEEE7C9Q38848584-EA18BA03-5EB0-4A35-A332-ED1D8EA64062Q38946219-CDA12381-6478-4AB4-8804-91D2BD4796F8Q39042324-47F323C9-8672-4F14-B3EB-36F7980B480DQ39254895-860C2E2A-A279-413E-967F-DF8365E9921DQ39423190-A8A8F9DA-37FE-4E20-8B6D-6726F03B1273Q41848416-259773C3-E9B4-4042-9697-69816050BCE3Q42256863-23C559F5-4CAB-47A9-9DF2-474CF87DA910Q43091214-A1E7233B-62FA-48FC-9779-987D0FED63F7Q44407860-6F713ACE-B034-4857-ABA7-FEBB65428130Q45002752-4F48FB30-F473-430C-9DD8-553E0FF82D1AQ46887389-47989BF4-4565-43BD-AC2B-6D1257DACF86Q47115138-6BB5F446-60A7-4727-A707-C9D634376CD7Q47428004-1B61B9CE-2EAB-41D4-8ABB-8719B1165161Q47940501-408E16B4-F436-4DDF-9C99-E1406A184D77Q55363597-8962C4B2-3B23-4484-B452-D08FA37988F6
P2860
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
2012年论文
@zh
2012年论文
@zh-cn
name
Is probabilistic bias analysis approximately Bayesian?
@ast
Is probabilistic bias analysis approximately Bayesian?
@en
type
label
Is probabilistic bias analysis approximately Bayesian?
@ast
Is probabilistic bias analysis approximately Bayesian?
@en
prefLabel
Is probabilistic bias analysis approximately Bayesian?
@ast
Is probabilistic bias analysis approximately Bayesian?
@en
P2860
P1433
P1476
Is probabilistic bias analysis approximately Bayesian?
@en
P2093
Paul Gustafson
Richard F MacLehose
P2860
P304
P356
10.1097/EDE.0B013E31823B539C
P577
2012-01-01T00:00:00Z