A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.

A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35745186

about

Recent advances in microvascular autologous breast reconstruction after ablative tumor surgery Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes Individualized Risk of Surgical Complications: An Application of the Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment Score Predictive capability of near-infrared fluorescence angiography in submental perforator flap survival Microcirculation in single and multiple-based perforator flaps in an experimental model of rats.Effects of venous supercharging in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap.Microcirculatory evaluation of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps with laser Doppler perfusion imaging in breast reconstruction.Submental perforator flap design with a near-infrared fluorescence imaging system: the relationship among number of perforators, flap perfusion, and venous drainage Gastric tube necrosis following minimally invasive oesophagectomy is a learning curve issue.My first 100 consecutive microvascular free flaps: pearls and lessons learned in first year of practice.Salvage of intraoperative deep inferior epigastric perforator flap venous congestion with augmentation of venous outflow: flap morbidity and review of the literature The gracilis myocutaneous free flap: a quantitative analysis of the fasciocutaneous blood supply and implications for autologous breast reconstruction A multiple logistic regression analysis of complications following microsurgical breast reconstruction.Plastic surgery and the breast: a citation analysis of the literature Perfusion-related complications are similar for DIEP and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps harvested on medial or lateral deep inferior epigastric Artery branch perforators for breast reconstruction.Abdominal perforator vs. muscle sparing flaps for breast reconstruction.Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction without Microsurgery Fellowship Training.Evaluation of dynamic infrared thermography as an alternative to CT angiography for perforator mapping in breast reconstruction: a clinical study.Previous multiple abdominal surgeries: a valid contraindication to abdominal free flap breast reconstruction?Role of Breast Surgery in BRCA Mutation Carriers.Three routine free flaps per day in a single operating theatre: principles of a process mapping approach to improving surgical efficiency.Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue following mastectomy Complications After Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer: A Claims-Based Analysis Bilateral Breast Reconstruction with Abdominal Free Flaps: A Single Centre, Single Surgeon Retrospective Review of 55 Consecutive Patients.A comparison of the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: A cost-effectiveness analysis.Total posterior leg open wound management with free anterolateral thigh flap: case and literature review.Predictors of Reoperations in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction.Patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a systematic review.What Would Women Choose When Given a Choice in Breast Reconstruction?Quantitative assessment of perfusion and vascular compromise in perforator flaps using a near-infrared fluorescence-guided imaging system.Computed tomography-based preoperative vascular imaging in autologous breast reconstruction: A Canadian perspective.The impact of perforator number on deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction.A Novel Strategy to Supercharge a Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap after Port-a-Cath Removal.Breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.The effect of lipoaspirates vs. dissected abdominal fat on breast cancer cells in vitro.Endoscopic nipple sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction versus breast conserving surgery: a long-term study.Postoperative Pain Management in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: Identification of Patients With Poor Pain Control.Achieving autologous breast reconstruction for breast cancer patients in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy.Etiology of breast masses after autologous breast reconstruction.An algorithmic approach to total breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer

P2860

Q26767025-4340974C-8951-41F6-A7F1-4EE2E3C8E144 Q26773601-51F99C48-7F78-40AD-97EE-F1268742D2E9 Q30488069-D024868F-67FA-4D99-ACA4-50FFD9C59B88 Q30497267-26E1D286-0658-4B5B-A5D2-C5E579F9A707 Q33289635-373BAE97-79D1-45F8-A0F6-241C881C3DF5 Q33317539-4CADF0F7-382C-470F-BCE3-89FA1CD75BC8 Q33935274-E58046F3-11AF-4661-ADD8-5C9E615C9B6F Q34111517-BEB43A3D-3C7C-47C7-B9DF-0E1B97665B12 Q34192606-173FD53F-4F69-4657-814D-55F52F834041 Q34238107-1A8394E3-33F6-401C-AE3C-F120B69BAFC0 Q34238978-43AE1AAF-EC05-46E3-BF2A-3DB63B2CB6F0 Q34270715-441BEA64-C600-4A9E-AC24-C4E275A75DD9 Q34573592-FF87E971-2887-4B92-9553-2DF42DC75048 Q34632193-9A4DA444-CE6F-41DA-BE65-847D4EA2ED48 Q35580674-A1F41ABC-5919-4447-96A7-8AE441E73A5D Q35708029-2F77514F-2F4D-4C07-BE0D-92A7573C8141 Q35924560-A2C1BF0F-868B-45CD-9F25-4B572E9213C3 Q36078933-7D611973-F000-4DE2-8D6D-12D456B77D4B Q36111713-4C2F11D5-6691-4D93-8C00-D4E840097FB5 Q36457900-8C9A995D-81FA-47F0-A7EE-FA229A8BC8CB Q36685733-DD6BCB7F-5BDE-4DC2-BFEA-EB913A8A1759 Q36765916-13CD24EC-C48C-44C2-8CED-BFB40ADDFB8C Q36775867-9182B8C1-F507-4D6E-A2A4-CD662EA529F4 Q37140707-1D3DE80D-21F8-4ED4-8680-86457259B061 Q37214759-15B559C3-462E-4809-879A-4F472EE7376B Q37218656-519FB782-626A-4575-A2B5-8370F645C23F Q37230180-4DBD634C-9A50-445A-97AA-BC48ADA57E8E Q37291755-F09F424C-C5B4-4A61-B6C4-8854F67D48DD Q37320762-706C1F02-C829-44AE-95BE-BC151E3142EA Q37340117-64E1BA24-BC0E-4A64-B7B1-B652FB19DC60 Q37476008-4DD56FAB-7AB2-43B1-A18B-D7DB80C165CA Q37559140-5A90BC80-9BA3-40F9-BFBE-241BADA41E65 Q37574506-4A6983ED-C0F5-4B8A-8C5F-786F1D817B70 Q37637378-C15A4D85-7222-430C-90EF-AA5F199581DD Q37715519-2029E0F8-6B18-4349-AF0C-CBC6885DA1F5 Q37731446-B153903D-A2D5-45E6-B6CC-F05CF6919D43 Q37791434-5E3DF38D-28F7-41E4-933B-32B386DEC5DA Q37812573-D71407D2-1031-46AB-B8D2-7DAD77F4D984 Q38039905-F23ECB17-BCD1-4D51-9865-68D46ED6BD7C Q38111398-D248E2F7-308C-4DFD-9382-002DE847AEA1

P2860

A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35745186

description

2004 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2004年の論文

@ja

2004年論文

@yue

2004年論文

@zh-hant

2004年論文

@zh-hk

2004年論文

@zh-mo

2004年論文

@zh-tw

2004年论文

@wuu

2004年论文

@zh

2004年论文

@zh-cn

name

A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.

@ast

A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.

@en

type

label

A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.

@ast

A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.

@en

prefLabel

A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.

@ast

A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.

@en

P1433

Q35745186-BC52D3AF-FFB3-4B6B-BBC4-18B7BF9D6B45

P1476

Q35745186-6C58EF00-D6B7-4965-9056-D5C9FBDC39E3

P2093

Q35745186-08E90784-E520-4DD7-B379-FF70931EB8A8

Q35745186-09F790F1-17FF-472C-B47F-04D44E51B293

Q35745186-326726C6-1B22-4B95-88F4-BF4DA1A91A2E

Q35745186-4658F7F4-F680-46CC-AC2F-C14B9CCD33CB

Q35745186-9EEB73D2-E48C-42BC-8AF3-CD03A63CC171

Q35745186-B1288D36-2AA2-4B63-BBFA-B77063338647

Q35745186-D193E3AD-824C-4E24-A1DC-625BACF88B2B

Q35745186-F37BFE2D-DFC4-4030-A03D-B811B536EBBC

Q35745186-FB5B9379-C91C-41AF-AB6E-933B189A020B

P304

Q35745186-ABD1DF53-28CA-439F-869D-2CADE8F36B4F

P31

Q35745186-BD1E0055-8A83-4088-B433-74636337A862

P356

Q35745186-CB8B9A79-330E-4CEB-8813-F33C0F199176

P407

Q35745186-240E76A2-6819-4D89-85BF-B66BD5A9E96A

P433

Q35745186-A295CD0C-6F9B-4865-9380-7D801FF2FE0A

P478

Q35745186-8DBB2CB8-6198-44CF-86C6-66B3C9213471

P577

Q35745186-298B7240-860C-4180-946E-9C999F1F30D3

P698

Q35745186-5E425997-282C-4FDE-ACA4-4A7BFCA51F62

P356

01.PRS.0000110328.47206.50

P1433

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

P1476

A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.

@en

P2093

Aldo B Guerra

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Charles L Dupin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Frank J Dellacroce

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

John P Hunt

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Jonathan Boraski

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Paul S Gill

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Robert J Allen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Scott K Sullivan

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Stephen E Metzinger

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P304

1153-1160

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1097/01.PRS.0000110328.47206.50

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

4

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

113

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2004-04-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

15083015

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string