Compactness of human housekeeping genes: selection for economy or genomic design?
about
Noncoding DNA, isochores and gene expression: nucleosome formation potentialCorrelation and prediction of gene expression level from amino acid and dipeptide composition of its proteinGametophytic selection in Arabidopsis thaliana supports the selective model of intron length reduction.Comparative analysis of chromatin landscape in regulatory regions of human housekeeping and tissue specific genesFAST DB: a website resource for the study of the expression regulation of human gene products.The gene encoding the fragile X RNA-binding protein is controlled by nuclear respiratory factor 2 and the CREB family of transcription factors.Origin and evolution of spliceosomal intronsPredicting housekeeping genes based on Fourier analysisThe evolution of intron size in amniotes: a role for powered flight?Effect of the transposable element environment of human genes on gene length and expressionDNA methylation and genome evolution in honeybee: gene length, expression, functional enrichment covary with the evolutionary signature of DNA methylationEvidence against the energetic cost hypothesis for the short introns in highly expressed genesGene function and expression level influence the insertion/fixation dynamics of distinct transposon families in mammalian intronsIn plants, expression breadth and expression level distinctly and non-linearly correlate with gene structureLength and GC content variability of introns among teleostean genomes in the light of the metabolic rate hypothesisHow many human genes can be defined as housekeeping with current expression data?Genomic selective constraints in murid noncoding DNAThe regulatory code for transcriptional response diversity and its relation to genome structural properties in A. thaliana.Genome organization and gene expression shape the transposable element distribution in the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatin.Physiology, pathology and relatedness of human tissues from gene expression meta-analysis.Adaptive and nonadaptive genome size evolution in Karst endemic flora of China.Intergenic and genic sequence lengths have opposite relationships with respect to gene expressionDefinition, conservation and epigenetics of housekeeping and tissue-enriched genesMutational biases and selective forces shaping the structure of Arabidopsis genes.Large introns in relation to alternative splicing and gene evolution: a case study of Drosophila bruno-3Insight into microRNA regulation by analyzing the characteristics of their targets in humans.A universal nonmonotonic relationship between gene compactness and expression levels in multicellular eukaryotes.Expression breadth and expression abundance behave differently in correlations with evolutionary ratesGene expression in chicken reveals correlation with structural genomic features and conserved patterns of transcription in the terrestrial vertebrates.Dynamism in gene expression across multiple studies.Genome-wide functional analysis of human 5' untranslated region introns.Selection for the compactness of highly expressed genes in Gallus gallusRegional regulation of transcription in the bovine genome.Identification of human housekeeping genes and tissue-selective genes by microarray meta-analysis.Composition and regulation of maternal and zygotic transcriptomes reflects species-specific reproductive mode.Recombination drives vertebrate genome contraction.The small introns of antisense genes are better explained by selection for rapid transcription than by "genomic design"A simple model to explain evolutionary trends of eukaryotic gene architecture and expression: how competition between splicing and cleavage/polyadenylation factors may affect gene expression and splice-site recognition in eukaryotesPartitioning the human transcriptome using HKera, a novel classifier of housekeeping and tissue-specific genes.'Genome design' model and multicellular complexity: golden middle
P2860
Q24801512-7F94C9D2-5EA9-4FEC-A552-F72E1D74776FQ24805377-DCF8AAB6-46C0-4901-857F-A3EEEB8B2730Q24813367-8BD8DCED-2E9C-419C-AE64-E310F4327DB5Q24815416-0C85D908-141B-4BD6-9086-C7F61E2C343CQ24815689-4D3CB1EE-2CE9-4EE2-8AB5-A223C9008119Q25255073-666C4FA2-DF06-4DF5-8A4C-E32F676EBAD6Q27498824-93422BCD-7CB9-455B-A407-81BCBCEDA32DQ28478499-39919263-9FDD-441C-B979-8B4783C6A700Q28714241-FA26DFE8-C82F-43BB-9F4C-A1C2861B2267Q28741429-67A153C9-7919-4C1D-8A05-AD0B16F65AABQ28748520-B0172D9A-1AB5-46DC-B062-80F6AA832D99Q28757923-5C7374B3-70B9-4F57-A0E1-21CB39CF48B1Q28763660-74DB28B6-A493-405E-9477-E35307AC9960Q30492350-562FF75E-C678-437C-B2E2-E5C95F758422Q30585912-A4E49EBA-A851-4C56-AA87-3F91EAE3EFF0Q31152791-A7A35B6D-17AF-401B-A7F8-D35214D72E9DQ33266436-04FADB89-213E-4874-923E-28D03A2FB354Q33273033-63BDC51B-2852-4047-97BA-A3FD38A95108Q33310469-D980B77E-EB5D-4842-99B0-3493A84D4E83Q33326615-DC43039E-2945-4FB6-A6D3-8E5FDCEBEA0DQ33357861-C94B5776-DA61-4799-A238-B1A49B0A0C2CQ33383196-E788225C-38F5-41AA-8F2A-31D26400AECBQ33469919-40C93346-E625-4050-8E5A-34C84F733B2CQ33487174-19AD2A06-0B1F-4BDF-951B-EF275EC0AD94Q33511369-413AE9CE-950B-4C2D-8F6C-57372D9700E3Q33517918-A51C1A96-25D6-47DD-8999-B52F8FBC50D2Q33545200-D737A338-8B3E-4915-A317-1AE5091C3F78Q33651740-069DB11A-5EAA-43BC-853F-088D10C63E03Q33654276-65AD9891-1DA7-4614-8AB9-84F715DF0846Q33675348-83E3310C-252E-491F-A8F4-AD1D479A5AA6Q33829781-A40CA0B1-26EC-4E37-A3F1-993E7534D61CQ33907203-3A31ECC0-6F6C-49FE-9BEF-FB577FDF7810Q33932915-645E65E8-FCFB-4517-8E01-5B35076131E5Q33983496-7313D905-3DC3-472F-9764-83FE475AAFAEQ34024454-A6BB1079-E708-4202-9380-9005A0A61D20Q34263156-7805A732-89F1-40CB-9909-6B54872B811DQ34587115-EDEE41BF-6147-4B12-8AEC-905AF98365AFQ34660002-80D71A79-5B16-466A-BFAE-37856E1AF3AFQ35077865-8EA6A2BF-AD4F-4E84-9B41-B7103A0498B5Q35128164-CFADB0A2-B0F4-4F00-8068-B17B7CE04BAF
P2860
Compactness of human housekeeping genes: selection for economy or genomic design?
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年論文
@yue
2004年論文
@zh-hant
2004年論文
@zh-hk
2004年論文
@zh-mo
2004年論文
@zh-tw
2004年论文
@wuu
2004年论文
@zh
2004年论文
@zh-cn
name
Compactness of human housekeeping genes: selection for economy or genomic design?
@ast
Compactness of human housekeeping genes: selection for economy or genomic design?
@en
type
label
Compactness of human housekeeping genes: selection for economy or genomic design?
@ast
Compactness of human housekeeping genes: selection for economy or genomic design?
@en
prefLabel
Compactness of human housekeeping genes: selection for economy or genomic design?
@ast
Compactness of human housekeeping genes: selection for economy or genomic design?
@en
P1433
P1476
Compactness of human housekeeping genes: selection for economy or genomic design?
@en
P2093
Alexander E Vinogradov
P304
P356
10.1016/J.TIG.2004.03.006
P577
2004-05-01T00:00:00Z