How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer.

about

Peer review: tips from field experts for junior reviewers.An instrument to assess the statistical intensity of medical research papers.

P2860

Q43193300-B60461D7-13C8-4CF7-81EF-540C61538B0F Q47104326-D3AF7E21-67E1-4175-9B5E-D78A4CEA983C

P2860

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35828700

description

2015 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2015年の論文

@ja

2015年論文

@yue

2015年論文

@zh-hant

2015年論文

@zh-hk

2015年論文

@zh-mo

2015年論文

@zh-tw

2015年论文

@wuu

2015年论文

@zh

2015年论文

@zh-cn

name

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer.

@ast

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer.

@en

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer.

@en-gb

type

Item

label

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer.

@ast

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer.

@en

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer.

@en-gb

prefLabel

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer.

@ast

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer.

@en

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer.

@en-gb

P1154

2-s2.0-84945911451

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P1433

BMC Medicine

P1476

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer.

@en

P2093

Jennifer V Freeman

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials

Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis

Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement

Subgroup analysis and other (mis)uses of baseline data in clinical trials.

The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors.

Including all individuals is not enough: lessons for intention-to-treat analysis.

An exploratory study of statistical assessment of papers published in the British Medical Journal.

The task of a statistical referee.

Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.

Making research articles fit for purpose: structured reporting of key methods and findings.

P2888

s12916-015-0510-5

P304

270

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1186/S12916-015-0510-5

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

English

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Darren C. Greenwood

P5530

4713640

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2015-11-02T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

283356235

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1023569683

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6366

1951198794

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6409

81821704

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

26521808

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

Amar

P932

4629287

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer.

about

P2860

P2860

How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1154

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P407

P478

P50

P5530

P577

P5875

P6179

P6366

P6409

P698

P921

P932

P953

P356

P6366

P1154

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P407

P478

P50

P5530

P577

P5875

P6179

P6366

P6409

P698

P921

P932