A perspective from countries using organized screening programs.
about
Population-based programs for increasing colorectal cancer screening in the United StatesCancer screening in the United States, 2013: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines, current issues in cancer screening, and new guidance on cervical cancer screening and lung cancer screeningCancer screening in the United States, 2015: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and current issues in cancer screeningCancer screening in the United States, 2014: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screeningImpact of organised programs on colorectal cancer screening.Implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: wisdom from the fieldPromoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trialIncreasing screening mammography among immigrant and minority women in Canada: a review of past interventions.Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, and Perceived Barriers of Colorectal Cancer Screening among Family Physicians in National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh.Trends of mammography use in a national breast cancer screening program, 2004-2008.Advances in Fecal Occult Blood Tests: the FIT revolution.Inter-physician variation in follow-up colonoscopies after screening colonoscopy.Adherence to physician recommendations for surveillance in opportunistic colorectal cancer screening: the necessity of organized surveillance.Disseminating a cervical cancer screening program through primary physicians in Hong Kong: a qualitative study.Breast cancer screening in Saudi Arabia: free but almost no takers.Trends in Cancer Screening Rates among Korean Men and Women: Results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey (KNCSS), 2004-2010.Analysis of ABC (D) stratification for screening patients with gastric cancerOpportunistic mammography screening provides effective detection rates in a limited resource healthcare system.Age differences in mammography screening reconsidered: life course trajectories in 13 European countries.Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening.Choosing the optimal method in programmatic colorectal cancer screening: current evidence and controversies.Trends in Cancer Screening Rates among Korean Men and Women: Results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey (KNCSS), 2004-2011.Gender Differences in Elders' Participation in the National Cancer Screening Program: Evidence from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010-12Multilevel factors affecting quality: examples from the cancer care continuum.Understanding the heterogeneity of cervical cancer screening non-participants: Data from a national sample of British women.Communication about colorectal cancer screening in Britain: public preferences for an expert recommendation.Effectiveness of gastric cancer screening programs in South Korea: organized vs opportunistic modelsThe impact of PSA testing frequency on prostate cancer incidence and treatment in older men.Evaluation of a worksite cervical screening initiative to increase Pap smear uptake in Malaysia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.Recommendations for a step-wise comparative approach to the evaluation of new screening tests for colorectal cancer.Changes in the magnitude of social inequality in the uptake of cervical cancer screening in Taiwan, a country implementing a population-based organized screening program.Examining the Cervical Screening Behaviour of Women Aged 50 or above and Its Predicting Factors: A Population-Based SurveyUsing physician-linked mailed invitations in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme: effectiveness and factors associated with response.Organized colorectal cancer screening in integrated health care systems.Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review.Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes.Faecal immunochemical tests versus guaiac faecal occult blood tests: what clinicians and colorectal cancer screening programme organisers need to know.Insufficient evidence on health literacy amongst Indigenous people with cancer: a systematic literature review.Socioeconomic Disparities in Cancer Screening: Organized versus OpportunisticRace/Ethnicity and Adoption of a Population Health Management Approach to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Community-Based Healthcare System.
P2860
Q26786602-8D9E0D3A-962B-4E59-998C-FDEB879B2906Q26864419-471C17F2-E197-4EA5-B2A4-2A42B4BA1983Q27001043-35FABDA1-DD17-4154-A56B-E88274B7CCC6Q27025805-822E6D77-11FF-4F7C-9D25-067EF63240C8Q33328300-3669B0CF-5F20-4D53-A5C7-27E774B60824Q33557009-D089E1DD-4BC5-4A3D-B8D6-E306D718B3C0Q33757715-AF16ADD2-C068-4095-91CB-BF09F637B681Q34265031-6460F076-38F3-4E16-A7EC-BD5D6A8EACB7Q34330736-84EABCBA-C0A5-43F1-8DC0-A976FA24092DQ34494743-EC50DA05-0A80-4D6C-A571-0912BE471821Q34666990-3B27F7BB-F806-408A-B5AE-0F675B91E3B2Q34853844-139BEBC1-335B-4262-896F-9A9C5A6EF562Q35064283-06B936A7-DC50-4DA8-9C8D-F0F248A57693Q35102802-DBC0DA4B-6607-4997-BF41-E27C85FA290AQ35182354-F7EB0B5C-5DA7-47F7-8572-A3D04C54CF78Q35340858-EEEFE117-90F8-469B-ADC1-BCCEB3733D84Q35589498-AF49EAB4-7008-4D41-B75B-E661CFA3E7BAQ35624443-A6E3535F-3537-4293-967E-19C142524531Q35661845-F5AB30ED-E103-4C57-AD2B-702B3D3D8E9EQ35664998-0A923D15-0680-464E-927D-C1D1B103C7FBQ35780915-C5D5029D-61EF-4565-A2A5-95A77C6D3C66Q36089555-E056AD1C-26B6-457E-882D-6A712F7B3DB3Q36282153-BFAB312C-F767-4A8E-AFA5-A43913199E28Q36352891-89F8757E-3CBD-4BE1-8156-4A2E5F7662D5Q36378664-804ADFFF-0DDF-4B6F-A667-FB6C3F8BB195Q36451775-8211530B-F8EB-4ED2-9DA1-5BA7D62AA431Q36615977-F558E1EE-916F-4B99-831C-2C8F928636B6Q36831317-C4D946F3-7EC4-4F30-B099-1AEAE6D953F1Q37173631-45E16850-FA7D-4B4F-802A-3B5734F9D3CEQ37344079-88101060-3F9C-4F15-BF94-8225D70A290CQ37497338-74E80714-E2AA-4BD1-B6D8-6605A3F34D3EQ37546414-01A0D8D5-39B4-42B7-A2FE-4053C9A402DBQ37657554-3294A5AA-F8B2-4656-9FEE-7F51EEB72077Q37895029-BDD8EAD4-95EC-4B76-B337-38CD7B0C1081Q38389267-298D3D73-AB6E-41C4-A88F-BA48DC7C1EE6Q38389435-22D1C2B5-2843-48E4-A383-44516C414F75Q38515202-E327D882-29C4-4779-9EDD-C1632CBC3236Q38932674-EA10EAA8-8539-4476-A87F-DA7794334830Q42390520-ED2D54D0-2173-46D2-9FD1-F5393A5D6DA5Q42709638-868195C4-A3AE-42DF-AE29-4093EF3F685F
P2860
A perspective from countries using organized screening programs.
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年論文
@yue
2004年論文
@zh-hant
2004年論文
@zh-hk
2004年論文
@zh-mo
2004年論文
@zh-tw
2004年论文
@wuu
2004年论文
@zh
2004年论文
@zh-cn
name
A perspective from countries using organized screening programs.
@ast
A perspective from countries using organized screening programs.
@en
type
label
A perspective from countries using organized screening programs.
@ast
A perspective from countries using organized screening programs.
@en
prefLabel
A perspective from countries using organized screening programs.
@ast
A perspective from countries using organized screening programs.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
A perspective from countries using organized screening programs.
@en
P2093
Anne Miles
Jane Wardle
Jill Cockburn
Robert A Smith
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/CNCR.20505
P407
P433
P577
2004-09-01T00:00:00Z