Comparison of localization performance with implanted fiducial markers and cone-beam computed tomography for on-line image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate.
about
Integration of multidisciplinary technologies for real time target visualization and verification for radiotherapy.Significance of image guidance to clinical outcomes for localized prostate cancerA comparison of radiographic techniques and electromagnetic transponders for localization of the prostate.Infections after fiducial marker implantation for prostate radiotherapy: are we underestimating the risks?Comparison of measurement methods with a mixed effects procedure accounting for replicated evaluations (COM3PARE): method comparison algorithm implementation for head and neck IGRT positional verificationDaily patient setup error in prostate image guided radiation therapy with fiducial-based kilovoltage onboard imaging and conebeam computed tomography.Comparison of CT number calibration techniques for CBCT-based dose calculation.Clinical commissioning of online seed matching protocol for prostate radiotherapy.Evaluation of inter-observer variability of bladder boundary delineation on cone-beam CT.Is there a role for advanced radiation therapy technologies in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma?Does radical treatment have a role in the management of low-risk prostate cancer? The place for brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy.VERO® radiotherapy for low burden cancer: 789 patients with 957 lesionsComparison of setup accuracy of three different image assessment methods for tangential breast radiotherapy.Systematisation of spatial uncertainties for comparison between a MR and a CT-based radiotherapy workflow for prostate treatmentsMetal artifact reduction from reformatted projections for hip prostheses in multislice helical computed tomography: techniques and initial clinical results.Method comparison of automated matching software-assisted cone-beam CT and stereoscopic kilovoltage x-ray positional verification image-guided radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: a prospective analysis.Technological advances in radiation therapy for prostate cancer.Emerging technologies in prostate cancer radiation therapy: improving the therapeutic window.kV cone-beam CT-based IGRT: a clinical review.Faculty of Radiation Oncology Position Paper on the use of Image-Guided Radiation Therapy.The impact of androgen deprivation therapy on setup errors during external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer.Fiducial marker guided prostate radiotherapy: a review.Automated target tracking in kilovoltage images using dynamic templates of fiducial marker clusters.Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the United Kingdom: a national survey.ACR Appropriateness Criteria® external beam radiation therapy treatment planning for clinically localized prostate cancer, part I of II.Inter- and intra-observer variability in contouring of the prostate gland on planning computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography.Patient-reported complications from fiducial marker implantation for prostate image-guided radiotherapy.Implantation of fiducial markers for image guidance in prostate radiotherapy: patient-reported toxicity.Consideration of the likely benefit from implementation of prostate image-guided radiotherapy using current margin sizes: a radiobiological analysis.Moving metal artifact reduction in cone-beam CT scans with implanted cylindrical gold markers.Evaluation of different set-up error corrections on dose-volume metrics in prostate IMRT using CBCT images.Clinical evaluation of soft tissue organ boundary visualization on cone-beam computed tomographic imaging.Image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate using daily CBCT: the feasibility and likely benefit of implementing a margin reductionInterfraction prostate movement in bone alignment after rectal enema for radiotherapy.Development of CBCT-based prostate setup correction strategies and impact of rectal distension.Six-Dimensional Correction of Intra-Fractional Prostate Motion with CyberKnife Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.A Phase II Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Low-Intermediate-High-Risk Prostate Cancer Using Helical Tomotherapy: Dose-Volumetric Parameters Predicting Early Toxicity.Schedule for CT image guidance in treating prostate cancer with helical tomotherapy.Magnitude of observer error using cone beam CT for prostate interfraction motion estimation: effect of reducing scan length or increasing exposure.2D kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers is more precise for daily image guided alignments than soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography for prostate radiation therapy.
P2860
Q33831256-1CD6AD8B-D48A-4A17-901A-E9DECFCF2340Q33993238-D4AD8D59-DABE-4EEB-B76A-2D7FA297EB4CQ34312758-8C16D6E4-57E6-44E2-B6BF-14016BD22E54Q35097300-65258190-95CD-4C6E-B732-410686921A16Q35756671-0E2092A7-4063-426D-A55E-268B722DB67DQ35872781-739EAF11-FA48-402E-993B-7D4ED4F6A480Q36309337-E8A5F543-9686-4610-861B-D7FDC4640E35Q36727173-A5728F9C-6B2C-4F5A-A997-0F935FC240E7Q37053632-9E1699C2-AA45-4553-8945-5DD86E080905Q37137013-19F3D844-4BFB-496E-8229-37F7F9C595A1Q37262835-786272DF-38D8-4DD6-8BC7-95CB624108C6Q37301542-50D7BA07-EBE8-4C87-BD74-F722A130B23AQ37515302-57908668-E4DA-4386-8869-0BCD3CBF1DC6Q37634144-CCDB9397-FD99-4E83-9979-C14B3B7D5357Q37665047-1EE15D1D-EAC9-49F3-83EB-6C394E874BB9Q37690595-0BE153B2-4499-48E2-AF97-68C6B3652A39Q37738793-90366E84-C9B1-4FF4-879E-32827F6A3BBFQ37791392-8686DDE4-81D5-4E62-AC9A-F87AB2B310A0Q37870806-C43D97E4-EF55-4F7D-BEAB-0708D07FE59FQ38819438-235721AB-9412-43C9-8D84-CE6318459A1BQ38837327-20986995-885B-4ACA-8C2E-5B13EEB4CE27Q38944077-34501D9E-3CF5-476A-824A-8529E2AACBA9Q39051316-F8A710BA-37E6-4322-9CDB-77368C213A42Q39124431-CEA7B11C-E0AA-492D-BD4A-1D9B1C3891F7Q39456200-37010D2A-5342-485E-A637-E3A6D96F0D9EQ39773584-9919A1C1-92F7-4D8A-B4DA-FC14B0670059Q40298928-3DCE0261-0406-4E77-B09C-A48C53314C3DQ40387434-5FC42553-FE31-41F7-A884-6FFE12057AD8Q41553976-8331926D-8CB7-4F7B-9092-DCD687C53AB6Q41730372-B7783EA6-6187-476F-8AB1-1805EB8AB17CQ41819027-CF5F3F45-C703-4652-955D-550F85ED6626Q41836343-2B750EE1-0A2F-4CDA-A512-A7BE893571DCQ41869095-F1341E97-4293-4C67-A428-80ECEA5B980EQ41881335-B74840B7-65B3-432C-AA7F-4533F910BD97Q41950829-FE3D4CB3-240E-44CC-9523-CD588D3DE730Q42175056-C948F1C9-E5B5-449B-8F08-BAE165133E3EQ42250155-9A8D0867-3EF7-456E-A4DB-26A14F3B9C01Q42420324-76276BAD-21D4-442F-BAF6-AABD2CEDF44FQ43063798-332BA8E8-A06C-427D-A1B4-5F566CFD40F2Q43379636-8793AF36-594F-41F2-838E-50380A1A5D4A
P2860
Comparison of localization performance with implanted fiducial markers and cone-beam computed tomography for on-line image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
2007年论文
@zh
2007年论文
@zh-cn
name
Comparison of localization per ...... radiotherapy of the prostate.
@ast
Comparison of localization per ...... radiotherapy of the prostate.
@en
type
label
Comparison of localization per ...... radiotherapy of the prostate.
@ast
Comparison of localization per ...... radiotherapy of the prostate.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of localization per ...... radiotherapy of the prostate.
@ast
Comparison of localization per ...... radiotherapy of the prostate.
@en
P2093
P2860
P50
P1476
Comparison of localization per ...... radiotherapy of the prostate.
@en
P2093
Charles N Catton
Elizabeth A White
Jean-Pierre Bissonnette
Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Kirsty L Wiltshire
Mary Gospodarowicz
Michael B Sharpe
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.IJROBP.2006.10.039
P407
P577
2007-03-01T00:00:00Z