Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems.

Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35873345

about

Correction: Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems.Morphological and genetic factors shape the microbiome of a seabird species (Oceanodroma leucorhoa) more than environmental and social factors.Organic Amendments in a Long-term Field Trial-Consequences for the Bulk Soil Bacterial Community as Revealed by Network Analysis.The Bacterial Community Structure and Dynamics of Carbon and Nitrogen when Maize (Zea mays L.) and Its Neutral Detergent Fibre Were Added to Soil from Zimbabwe with Contrasting Management Practices.Paddy-upland rotation for sustainable agriculture with regards to diverse soil microbial community.Importance of Soil Temperature for the Growth of Temperate Crops under a Tropical Climate and Functional Role of Soil Microbial Diversity.Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities Differ According to Fertilizer Regimes and Cabbage ( var. L.) Harvest Time, but Not Aphid Herbivory

P2860

Q42836261-6B3CB49D-5B43-496E-9D37-C5AF0E0FDCC8 Q45981743-6BB29395-1E27-4D35-9858-F00F2EF14834 Q46251417-BA923BDC-C9B5-493C-9FB6-4C71B5063681 Q46500190-DDDA7B23-0BBA-491F-999B-E93EA1092B4E Q54968636-5406B107-8A48-4F26-8068-E29D5E1BED9F Q55467097-8B9B4292-AAF3-40ED-9FDF-630E12BC5ACC Q56927706-47AB43A4-C55B-47AF-ADA5-460FBEE74B12

P2860

Comparative Analysis of Prokaryotic Communities Associated with Organic and Conventional Farming Systems.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35873345

description

2015 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2015年の論文

@ja

2015年論文

@yue

2015年論文

@zh-hant

2015年論文

@zh-hk

2015年論文

@zh-mo

2015年論文

@zh-tw

2015年论文

@wuu

2015年论文

@zh

2015年论文

@zh-cn

name

Comparative Analysis of Prokar ...... Conventional Farming Systems.

@ast

Comparative Analysis of Prokar ...... Conventional Farming Systems.

@en

type

label

Comparative Analysis of Prokar ...... Conventional Farming Systems.

@ast

Comparative Analysis of Prokar ...... Conventional Farming Systems.

@en

prefLabel

Comparative Analysis of Prokar ...... Conventional Farming Systems.

@ast

Comparative Analysis of Prokar ...... Conventional Farming Systems.

@en

P1433

Q35873345-9C3C3E77-55EF-499E-A5A7-056121F60603

P1476

Q35873345-6FE7007C-F12E-43B3-ABD1-2A8126244EE2

P2093

Q35873345-0061A680-B867-4957-93F8-F0B608ADE21F

Q35873345-54C83DFE-F2EC-46C8-9D20-88D794A7AFBD

Q35873345-74488AF0-CE93-4947-B919-88C6CE1B30A6

Q35873345-CEACA474-0C51-4A68-9B7D-7404E8A60E69

P2860

Q35873345-11FA546F-3EC9-448C-8827-7A862732B1F6

Q35873345-12B4F25E-D325-462E-A5FE-C9E20177106E

Q35873345-1318E536-780E-414E-9A9B-AEE85F034768

Q35873345-175B0178-119E-486A-A43E-01C019877F82

Q35873345-17AF961B-0BB3-4F49-BFCA-39DCD4ACB0AA

Q35873345-2129548D-E639-46EF-B143-5A0AC6A0DA2E

Q35873345-36083364-CAA4-41CE-A2DF-68F39F320BE3

Q35873345-4377C13E-3DC9-4DAD-A358-D6447ECD1C7F

Q35873345-4525047C-09E2-4B8A-975C-A951ECD72BB3

Q35873345-46338D55-78B6-48A7-9C39-820CAE7F42FD

P304

Q35873345-5C5AE8D5-CEF5-49AF-A469-8854A6C352AD

P31

Q35873345-D3DF70D1-29D0-4F74-841A-596EB5098394

P356

Q35873345-AD8696A9-7F08-4115-AB5F-D83BA121E925

P407

Q35873345-FAABAA16-5CAD-4ED4-9E0F-F7C709537B84

P433

Q35873345-96BF4161-6498-48DD-AC1C-CDDFECB20648

P478

Q35873345-D2110560-7133-4B40-AEA9-593F431207B4

P50

Q35873345-410531F6-1ADA-46CD-88C3-FE784FA439D4

Q35873345-4BF08C87-3A04-48DA-BAC6-099FAE79E902

Q35873345-AC075718-C7B4-4708-9E3B-725F25EFD1A6

Q35873345-FAE9AC73-A672-49F0-A255-BF28AE004811

P577

Q35873345-F5F20FF4-140C-49F6-BBED-74649A943853

P5875

Q35873345-A142D570-81D7-4FEE-A724-CE93DF9090D6

P698

Q35873345-4703B9A3-E202-44BC-84C9-62D63E257C4D

P921

Q35873345-1519D980-5479-48E8-87DF-B79CC35BE88C

P932

Q35873345-D5C5262E-BCD0-4B47-B507-49F8DC026719

P356

JOURNAL.PONE.0145072

P1433

P1476

Comparative Analysis of Prokar ...... Conventional Farming Systems.

@en

P2093

Evgeny Chirak

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ilia Korvigo

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Nykolay Provorov

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Päivi Kurki

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity

QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data

Cattle Manure Enhances Methanogens Diversity and Methane Emissions Compared to Swine Manure under Rice Paddy

Distinct soil bacterial communities revealed under a diversely managed agroecosystem

Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB

UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities.

Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy

The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach

PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment

DGGE fragments oscillate with or counter to fluctuations in cultivable bacteria along wheat roots.

P304

e0145072

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0145072

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

12

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

10

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Evgeny E Andronov

Ekaterina Ivanova

Elizaveta Pershina

P577

2015-12-18T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

287488952

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

26684619

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

P932

4684275

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string