A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: applying a logic of appropriateness.
about
Simulating irrational human behavior to prevent resource depletionThe Role of Prosocialness and Trust in the Consumption of Water as a Limited ResourceTestosterone promotes either dominance or submissiveness in the Ultimatum Game depending on players' social rank."In-group love" and "out-group hate" as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflict: a new game paradigm.Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making.Equity, Equal Shares or Equal Final Outcomes? Group Goal Guides Allocations of Public Goods.Gender Moderates the Influence of Self-Construal Priming on Fairness Considerations.Challenging the myth of the irrational dairy farmer; understanding decision-making related to herd health.Data sharing as social dilemma: Influence of the researcher's personalityOvercoming Learning Aversion in Evaluating and Managing Uncertain Risks.Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted.Human Cooperation: Challenges for Science and Practice.The games economists play: Why economics students behave more selfishly than other students.Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups.Is pride a prosocial emotion? Interpersonal effects of authentic and hubristic pride.Radical framing effects in the ultimatum game: the impact of explicit culturally transmitted frames on economic decision-making.Initial ownership in bargaining: introducing the giving, splitting, and taking ultimatum bargaining game.The Campbell paradigm as a conceptual alternative to the expectation of hypocrisy in contemporary attitude research.Uncovering and overcoming ambivalence: the role of chronic and contextually activated attachment in two-person social dilemmas.Conflict and coordination in the provision of public goods: a conceptual analysis of continuous and step-level games.Perceiving intergroup conflict: from game models to mental templates.Team negotiation: social, epistemic, economic, and psychological consequences of subgroup conflict.Reducing exposure to trust-related risks to avoid self-blame.Anger and retribution after collective overuse: the role of blaming and environmental uncertainty in social dilemmas.Justifying decisions in social dilemmas: justification pressures and tacit coordination under environmental uncertainty.How does Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) affect latrine ownership? A quantitative case study from Mozambique.Is Community-Led Total Sanitation connected to the rebuilding of latrines? Quantitative evidence from Mozambique.Development, Validation, and Implementation of a Medical Judgment MetricDo people care about social context? Framing effects in dictator gamesInformation, belief elicitation and threshold effects in the 5X1000 tax scheme: a framed field experimentEnergy Sharing and Energy Feedback: Affective and Behavioral Reactions to Communal Energy DisplaysThe interactive effect of pro-environmental disciplinary concentration under cooperation versus competition contextsINNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA
P2860
Q30389389-C0AC0984-3E85-409E-BBF3-D9F8AA6EC639Q33645732-FE54B263-937A-4205-A1CD-B15A5D202CD8Q33902759-B56526A1-1B4E-4229-8FD5-D199EE04DA7FQ34768839-ED97A46E-CC93-4770-AD2F-8DD3B04C4E7FQ37153356-C486C12C-7656-44AC-A2B9-B5941E9F2238Q37604091-DE136E26-D97A-4209-9B59-09D11203F882Q37733762-C4BEFA6D-5F30-42AF-BD75-A7322906293DQ37843892-542FF01E-BA3B-49A1-BCC4-8ACE3BFCA2E2Q38619870-7F296501-DBED-484F-814E-DB98B5B664DAQ38950855-CE9C99CE-8817-4E4C-ACDC-F165DEBFC3D8Q39304972-D757C928-502A-4C5B-9D4C-17C22CC07BEBQ40740669-479D9C8F-66DA-4AB6-ADBC-DE3EF1912119Q41617927-1C3C33C7-06F7-4C15-827C-73D43B375E41Q45950793-7299CF44-2E02-4923-B5FB-DC8355434489Q45950942-128C5530-49DA-4928-990A-712E7B3BCBA6Q47176797-A0349D0E-5BB3-49AA-81BE-DD044694D9B2Q47674843-F8389563-523B-4B41-9090-24647CBFF6AAQ47820278-39AFB89F-EC0E-4891-A95C-157579C6A869Q48001432-17E891E1-41B2-41E4-AFC7-8A60F7DF4DE4Q48205725-15052C5C-7402-4411-B008-C5B5873652F2Q48423243-D7C70295-DCF5-49D3-9893-0188E65C1E3BQ50631068-78A7AB95-94DE-4F69-8E9B-94003E3895C1Q50648420-C678ECA5-17CA-4FBE-84A0-185BC6F3AF1DQ50715417-AE530F94-13AB-4E25-AE2F-B75AA7ED7394Q53169777-429BC2CE-CB81-4ABA-8C23-A06BA84405BCQ53429161-C1F075C1-065B-472C-B158-1DF6C127E198Q55005439-826A7F95-41A0-4208-A6A3-B9B9DF480350Q57153166-1D028CF4-74A4-45D9-9BB7-490A9BBF7274Q57344941-81AB82CD-B424-4C58-B567-056807E23239Q57399446-07619997-81AB-49C3-8BA1-D941D32A153BQ57897591-870DD69E-8383-4348-9B4A-D957946D6034Q58221336-9001BDB9-E932-460B-8B4A-C3C49FF44E24Q58943496-8A5F1324-D394-401E-8322-448DE04753AC
P2860
A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: applying a logic of appropriateness.
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年論文
@yue
2004年論文
@zh-hant
2004年論文
@zh-hk
2004年論文
@zh-mo
2004年論文
@zh-tw
2004年论文
@wuu
2004年论文
@zh
2004年论文
@zh-cn
name
A conceptual review of decisio ...... ng a logic of appropriateness.
@ast
A conceptual review of decisio ...... ng a logic of appropriateness.
@en
type
label
A conceptual review of decisio ...... ng a logic of appropriateness.
@ast
A conceptual review of decisio ...... ng a logic of appropriateness.
@en
prefLabel
A conceptual review of decisio ...... ng a logic of appropriateness.
@ast
A conceptual review of decisio ...... ng a logic of appropriateness.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
A conceptual review of decisio ...... ng a logic of appropriateness.
@en
P2093
David M Messick
J Mark Weber
Shirli Kopelman
P2860
P304
P356
10.1207/S15327957PSPR0803_4
P577
2004-01-01T00:00:00Z