Difficulty in detecting discrepancies in a clinical trial report: 260-reader evaluation.

about

Difficulty in detecting discrepancies in a clinical trial report: 260-reader evaluation.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q35905648

description

2015 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2015年の論文

@ja

2015年論文

@yue

2015年論文

@zh-hant

2015年論文

@zh-hk

2015年論文

@zh-mo

2015年論文

@zh-tw

2015年论文

@wuu

2015年论文

@zh

2015年论文

@zh-cn

name

Difficulty in detecting discrepancies in a clinical trial report: 260-reader evaluation.

@ast

Difficulty in detecting discrepancies in a clinical trial report: 260-reader evaluation.

@en

type

Item

label

Difficulty in detecting discrepancies in a clinical trial report: 260-reader evaluation.

@ast

Difficulty in detecting discrepancies in a clinical trial report: 260-reader evaluation.

@en

prefLabel

Difficulty in detecting discrepancies in a clinical trial report: 260-reader evaluation.

@ast

Difficulty in detecting discrepancies in a clinical trial report: 260-reader evaluation.

@en

P1476

Difficulty in detecting discrepancies in a clinical trial report: 260-reader evaluation

@en

P2093

Alexandra N Nowbar

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Bharpoor Singh

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Darrel P Francis

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

David Zargaran

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Faisal Al-Mayahi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Graham D Cole

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Matthew J Shun-Shin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Saliha Mahmood

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P275

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

P2860

Discrepancies in autologous bone marrow stem cell trials and enhancement of ejection fraction (DAMASCENE): weighted regression and meta-analysis

Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports

Translating stem cell research to cardiac disease therapies: pitfalls and prospects for improvement

The limit of plausibility for predictors of response: application to biventricular pacing

The scandal of poor medical research

The acute and long-term effects of intracoronary Stem cell Transplantation in 191 patients with chronic heARt failure: the STAR-heart study

Autologous bone marrow-derived stem cell therapy in heart disease: discrepancies and contradictions

Why does primary angioplasty not work in registries? Quantifying the susceptibility of real-world comparative effectiveness data to allocation bias.

Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study.

Meta-analysis of secure randomised controlled trials of β-blockade to prevent perioperative death in non-cardiac surgery.

P304

862-869

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1093/IJE/DYV114

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Michael Mielewczik

Kevin G Buell

P577

2015-06-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

280123632

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

26174517

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

4521134

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string