Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system.
about
Functional capacity evaluation & disabilityThe application of strength and power related field tests in older adults: criteria, current status and a future perspectiveReview on the validity of self-report to assess work-related diseasesExperts opinion on the use of normative data for functional capacity evaluation in occupational and rehabilitation medicine and disability claims.A comparison of strength training, self-management, and the combination for early osteoarthritis of the kneeIdentifying factors relevant in the assessment of return-to-work efforts in employees on long-term sickness absence due to chronic low back pain: a focus group study.Exploring the diversity of conceptualizations of work (dis)ability: a scoping review of published definitions.The reliability of WorkWell Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation: a systematic review.Pain response of healthy workers following a functional capacity evaluation and implications for clinical interpretationThe evolving role of physiotherapists in pre-employment screening for workplace injury prevention: are functional capacity evaluations the answer?Reliability of clinician rated physical effort determination during functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.Instruments used to assess functional limitations in workers applying for disability benefit: a systematic review.The effects of fatigue on performance in simulated nursing work.Material handling performance of patients with chronic low back pain during functional capacity evaluation: a comparison between three countries.Test-retest reliability and agreement of the SPI-Questionnaire to detect symptoms of digital ischemia in elite volleyball players.Developing a Best-Evidence Pre-employment Medical Examination: An Example from the Construction Industry.Assessing the ability to work.Clients' and RTW experts' view on the utility of FCE for the assessment of physical work ability, prognosis for work participation and advice on return to work.Quantification of the safe maximal lift in functional capacity evaluations: comparison of muscle recruitment using SEMG and therapist observation.Treatment outcomes for workers compensation patients in a U.S.-based interdisciplinary pain management program.Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting.Updating the Evidence on Functional Capacity Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review.Task intensity influences upper limb and torso kinematics during two common overhead Functional Capacity Evaluation tasks.The eye-complaint questionnaire in a visual display unit work environment: internal consistency and test-retest reliability.Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the manual handling component of the WorkHab Functional Capacity Evaluation.Survey of kinesiologists' functional capacity evaluation practice in Canada.An investigation of the inter-rater reliability of the Valpar Joule functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults
P2860
Q24685759-7ED6E47C-CA42-40A0-AA20-BFE2B7E435EDQ26766659-9447A694-1ADC-4DE0-AB81-8B209DF8634EQ28397550-8A6750AD-68E0-476F-A810-D07A5BEFDDA5Q30783963-A1E77FFA-46B9-4892-991C-6A51E95F5C51Q33699657-5AA0F11B-75E1-4E0A-B473-431482CD31F2Q34138057-8DC4ACCE-5B01-4FF3-9594-9BAA202BAF87Q34864506-3B6F9024-B004-4E93-A9C5-915FE5477054Q35132911-7882C64D-70CC-484C-A54F-5E1A7FC0E877Q36849007-CB4B8281-1139-4FCF-B75F-4415DE04515CQ37196605-27100A18-50D0-4C12-9D2D-B4F5BCE44269Q37724531-28C1C077-5238-4B16-B771-BBE3F908908DQ37865542-3AEAACE9-4EC8-4D86-835D-2F6D41C51AA6Q39716069-3E6B0A5B-68C1-4EB1-BF2D-DD209EABB791Q40289397-152984D4-64EA-4736-83AA-B66002EC0FF2Q40394276-08165FC7-614B-4CC4-A3EF-E2CB230F5B71Q42226684-D4B7695C-1069-4B52-9664-06F3E20F4D60Q43072821-4AEB0245-9F66-464B-8FA6-6638B324CABDQ44068189-BF73DD2E-E7DE-4842-958D-F6F788911E4AQ45852952-D4F4308F-9FF7-4030-B826-CCD040C19642Q46548534-55DB0727-2CE0-40A4-B919-7713BD8B8D40Q47322090-A922C029-BE30-44A5-A66A-E24A16EAF1F6Q47910227-7CDBD992-73FF-45D4-8C7C-51CDC6E8AF3DQ50075196-9A598DCC-C9D5-4BC9-804E-180C7E0CF4D0Q51649846-BC5B9F33-8EDF-46C5-B76B-9B3B28DC9A82Q53079459-D9C26AB6-AB16-4EEE-897A-532BE2B1019DQ54376610-0085AB14-818E-4BCD-9F29-48D18E3EECC7Q59152952-2E053B92-4259-40CB-823A-ED0DB0D026B7
P2860
Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system.
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年論文
@yue
2004年論文
@zh-hant
2004年論文
@zh-hk
2004年論文
@zh-mo
2004年論文
@zh-tw
2004年论文
@wuu
2004年论文
@zh
2004年论文
@zh-cn
name
Reliability and validity of Fu ...... it and Isernhagen work system.
@ast
Reliability and validity of Fu ...... it and Isernhagen work system.
@en
type
label
Reliability and validity of Fu ...... it and Isernhagen work system.
@ast
Reliability and validity of Fu ...... it and Isernhagen work system.
@en
prefLabel
Reliability and validity of Fu ...... it and Isernhagen work system.
@ast
Reliability and validity of Fu ...... it and Isernhagen work system.
@en
P2093
P1476
Reliability and validity of Fu ...... it and Isernhagen work system.
@en
P2093
Haije Wind
Monique H W Frings-Dresen
P Paul F M Kuijer
Vincent Gouttebarge
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00420-004-0549-7
P577
2004-11-09T00:00:00Z