Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study.
about
Context-sensitive fluid therapy in critical illnessFluid Therapy: Double-Edged Sword during Critical Care?Fluid strategies and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysisPrediction of fluid responsiveness: an updateAdvanced Hemodynamic Management in Patients with Septic ShockSystematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.Associations of Hospital and Patient Characteristics with Fluid Resuscitation Volumes in Patients with Severe Sepsis: Post Hoc Analyses of Data from a Multicentre Randomised Clinical Trial.Patterns of intravenous fluid resuscitation use in adult intensive care patients between 2007 and 2014: An international cross-sectional study.Fluid responsiveness predicted by transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen in patients with circulatory failure: a prospective studyCan a central blood volume deficit be detected by systolic pressure variation during spontaneous breathing?Goal-Directed Resuscitation Aiming Cardiac Index Masks Residual Hypovolemia: An Animal Experiment.The haemodynamic dilemma in emergency care: Is fluid responsiveness the answer? A systematic review.Cardiovascular Function in Intensive Care Medicine or Homo Mensura EstUrine sodium concentration to predict fluid responsiveness in oliguric ICU patients: a prospective multicenter observational study.Practice of hemodynamic monitoring and management in German, Austrian, and Swiss intensive care units: the multicenter cross-sectional ICU-CardioMan StudyMulticountry survey of emergency and critical care medicine physicians' fluid resuscitation practices for adult patients with early septic shock.Targeted tissue perfusion versus macrocirculation-guided standard care in patients with septic shock (TARTARE-2S): study protocol and statistical analysis plan for a randomized controlled trialPassive leg raise testing effectively reduces fluid administration in septic shock after correction of non-compliance to test results.Fluid resuscitation in human sepsis: Time to rewrite history?A Comparison of Residents' Knowledge Regarding the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2012 Guideline.Passive Leg Raising: Simple and Reliable Technique to Prevent Fluid Overload in Critically ill PatientsOptimal right heart filling pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome determined by strain echocardiography.Sepsis: frontiers in supportive care, organisation and research.Sepsis: frontiers in diagnosis, resuscitation and antibiotic therapy.Changes in B-type Natriuretic Peptide and Related Hemodynamic Parameters Following a Fluid Challenge in Critically Ill Patients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock.Passive Leg Raising in Intensive Care MedicinePredicting fluid responsiveness in 100 critically ill children: the effect of baseline contractility.Crystalloid Fluid Choice and Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Sepsis: A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.Balanced crystalloids for septic shock resuscitation.Early hemodynamic assessment and treatment of elderly patients in the medical ICU.Restricting volumes of resuscitation fluid in adults with septic shock after initial management: the CLASSIC randomised, parallel-group, multicentre feasibility trial.Impact of hemodynamic goal-directed resuscitation on mortality in adult critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Transpulmonary thermodilution: advantages and limits.The Intensive Care Medicine research agenda on critically ill oncology and hematology patients.Effects of fluid restriction on measures of circulatory efficacy in adults with septic shock.Association between fluid balance and mortality in patients with septic shock: a post hoc analysis of the TRISS trial.What is the impact of the fluid challenge technique on diagnosis of fluid responsiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Perioperative fluid management: From physiology to improving clinical outcomes.Liberal or restrictive dilemma-that's a CLASSIC!Echocardiography to guide fluid therapy in critically ill patients: check the heart and take a quick look at the lungs.
P2860
Q26764872-4D42ED87-014A-451A-94FA-357CFDF35423Q26769684-0EE81F58-A36B-4F42-8413-165D882EB0C1Q26864121-A5C5B4EC-B77C-4474-BAD0-39C92E9E9E6AQ28070334-BA93D80B-5504-4A32-8DB3-A2369E81278DQ28077857-A651082E-E1EF-46BB-AC7E-8229F5744E74Q31031160-6A113C1B-F14C-47D7-AB25-6FD09D38C64DQ31097329-4F0873B6-F3ED-4B46-9C02-A591E4180A81Q33674732-463E975B-044B-4B0E-BFC9-3CAF2D1CC499Q33719878-D1DC02CF-482A-403B-A2B8-436E4369F328Q36101930-F7CBA340-E246-47C5-BDE6-EF08D64B5F16Q36205267-C8E3213F-7EF8-470F-B5F1-206DB2CDC8C7Q36298838-E5529C3D-E418-403F-B17C-2A93DCDDC2F9Q36805932-3E843FCB-0B93-4916-91D8-B1E5E23D9FA8Q36945788-57BB144C-5806-482C-B738-D31B6EC04AC0Q36952386-4AD624A4-7C1F-46BC-9FB5-428A5C7DA6CFQ37100924-BD364EC5-3486-436B-B5D4-D3AFEF9E3853Q37148514-B4EE930A-FDB8-4171-BD6E-D0F14221E3A9Q37553157-E465B437-85E3-488C-AD4E-E6452973B973Q37553163-6179CE57-0655-4DB2-BCD3-CD35C841248EQ37671335-1AE1B7C8-ED15-4F95-848A-D3EA4D15142EQ38652564-296D5F84-7E79-4CC9-8C44-CEB727AEEA30Q38717921-1DA63A6F-7A9C-40D1-A56A-9D3CDA738A9AQ38764864-840E18B8-B823-4157-9EF5-A09A36D5D2D0Q38815453-91C70689-C2BE-4840-A3A0-E7F7B3360587Q38841451-8E95AB7B-3BA9-4C32-8FAD-2F7CB4E77751Q38895442-6F48743F-B1AC-424A-B9CF-E8501A97F4B3Q38959034-889FF54D-2658-469E-8209-8C6B47E39860Q39034299-5CF03293-6448-4A94-B7DA-72AA265B6672Q39093805-922D5187-B40C-407C-9635-B08EFEC0DC10Q39146673-BD55EEB6-FDB2-4C6C-BE19-C7AD26E6CC42Q39338060-151D4AFD-4028-4F5F-9C9B-963851A01CC5Q39358854-CA8A162D-E8DB-4F58-A088-BAF0BE99B17DQ39380711-9D72BF61-22E1-406F-A5F0-E57015BE4F48Q39446746-AF49D5E0-7E53-4911-A728-00A59C1ADB2BQ40349180-90F6FA96-4AD8-49C5-8647-C23C350CC18AQ40734824-ABD3B5DE-AE38-4B71-A087-C75D6D09A24EQ41248330-04180646-F38E-4EFE-AA0E-4D869E966CDDQ41585307-B942E122-0C36-440E-8287-D7E90A16AE2CQ42348029-EC0FC181-CCC9-45D8-A2EE-2BE369CF2665Q42362318-40AD3F4B-1B57-4E08-8F95-CD8BDB13123A
P2860
Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年論文
@yue
2015年論文
@zh-hant
2015年論文
@zh-hk
2015年論文
@zh-mo
2015年論文
@zh-tw
2015年论文
@wuu
2015年论文
@zh
2015年论文
@zh-cn
name
Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study.
@ast
Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study.
@en
type
label
Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study.
@ast
Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study.
@en
prefLabel
Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study.
@ast
Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study.
@en
P2093
P2860
P50
P1476
Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study.
@en
P2093
Antonio Artigas
Cesar Aldecoa
Christoph Hofer
Daniel De Backer
ESICM Trial Group
FENICE Investigators
Giorgio Della Rocca
Jean-Yves Lefrant
Michael Sander
Sameer Jog
P2507
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00134-015-3850-X
P577
2015-07-11T00:00:00Z