A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period.
about
Social media and rating sites as tools to understanding quality of care: a scoping reviewThe Voice of Chinese Health Consumers: A Text Mining Approach to Web-Based Physician ReviewsInvestigating the congruence of crowdsourced information with official government data: the case of pediatric clinicsPhysician Rating Websites: What Aspects Are Important to Identify a Good Doctor, and Are Patients Capable of Assessing Them? A Mixed-Methods Approach Including Physicians' and Health Care Consumers' Perspectives.What explains usage of mobile physician-rating apps? Results from a web-based questionnaireThe relationship between commercial website ratings and traditional hospital performance measures in the USAHow Patient Comments Affect Consumers' Use of Physician Performance MeasuresEight questions about physician-rating websites: a systematic review.Use of social media across US hospitals: descriptive analysis of adoption and utilization.Evaluations of dentists on a German physician rating Website: an analysis of the ratings.Using patient experiences on Dutch social media to supervise health care services: exploratory study.Examining the role of patient experience surveys in measuring health care quality.Patients respond more positively to physicians who focus on their ideal affectInsights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment.Popularity of internet physician rating sites and their apparent influence on patients' choices of physicians.The development of online doctor reviews in China: an analysis of the largest online doctor review website in ChinaIdentifying Quality Indicators Used by Patients to Choose Secondary Health Care Providers: A Mixed Methods ApproachProvider attributes correlation analysis to their referral frequency and awards.A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.Consistently increasing numbers of online ratings of healthcare in England.General Practitioners' Concerns About Online Patient Feedback: Findings From a Descriptive Exploratory Qualitative Study in England.Patients' ratings of family physician practices on the internet: usage and associations with conventional measures of quality in the English National Health ServiceWho is more likely to use doctor-rating websites, and why? A cross-sectional study in London.Internet use frequency and patient-centered care: measuring patient preferences for participation using the health information wants questionnaire.An analysis of online evaluations on a physician rating website: evidence from a German public reporting instrumentPhysician choice making and characteristics associated with using physician-rating websites: cross-sectional study.Investigating the Potential Contribution of Patient Rating Sites to Hospital Supervision: Exploratory Results From an Interview Study in the Netherlands.Modelling and Predicting eHealth Usage in Europe: A Multidimensional Approach From an Online Survey of 13,000 European Union Internet Users.Exploring Patients' Views Toward Giving Web-Based Feedback and Ratings to General Practitioners in England: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Use of sentiment analysis for capturing patient experience from free-text comments posted online.Correlating Ratings of Health Insurance Plans to Their Providers' AttributesIncreasing Consumer Engagement by Tailoring a Public Reporting Website on the Quality of Diabetes Care: A Qualitative StudyAssessing Quality of Care and Elder Abuse in Nursing Homes via Google Reviews.Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites.Patient assessments and online ratings of quality care: a "wake-up call" for providers.Physician review websites: effects of the proportion and position of negative reviews on readers' willingness to choose the doctor.Developments in the Frequency of Ratings and Evaluation Tendencies: A Review of German Physician Rating Websites.Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.Online Reviews as Health Data: Examining the Association Between Availability of Health Care Services and Patient Star Ratings Exemplified by the Yelp Academic Dataset.
P2860
Q26823252-BE5BC5C4-6C8E-408E-BEC7-A8C57DC9408BQ28076904-B82F956B-7524-4ADF-B965-E51EAD5FC2C4Q28658535-D335D5E6-804F-48A6-A1CB-49473C2BC4D2Q33690196-60CEF848-4F54-45A2-8119-0AE683832D40Q33807764-55101AC8-8577-4D86-AF70-EDD3A3DFE75CQ33818691-6B843886-EC22-4B52-9553-E51B021C7573Q33867580-B8329D6A-A4F8-4E03-A4DE-E44F70EB28B0Q34570727-EE33CEA8-E013-4C30-AD3D-3D9437FAF6D1Q34658437-538AA94B-B8F2-477C-AAF1-2973740FAA2DQ35055770-55DF1D99-1F31-4F31-BBE0-C7652D069457Q35055812-70DD92FB-4FC6-4D45-B033-CBC402CACD65Q35146054-5791BF84-773B-45A2-8435-16E02D372C5FQ35395184-CC5EFAE0-8C04-485D-B692-E4B3E01DC460Q35533811-5DF2CF74-0533-46C7-9F0B-C9379F94C0BCQ35789510-93AD7882-5B90-43EA-9D78-685E371C054AQ35922188-364E70BF-1A44-4546-A47C-9872CA836232Q35922251-8E52D301-2B8F-44C2-827F-843437012E6FQ35956567-2068106A-26C8-4146-87C6-E3B10895E1E5Q36092199-E6AF4220-01B2-4D9E-AE3D-2DDD4A4561FAQ36152235-44152D94-37AD-48A0-9015-9FC7EA44615BQ36440845-66D27523-9321-445F-9305-EEADBDB3624FQ36453609-83DE31DC-0D3F-4A8A-A297-0D4F2A4B4E06Q36496196-D039C7EA-8B7B-4D55-87FA-64FC14EDFB82Q37021167-8C66EF62-9E9C-4D86-9D29-727F713783DCQ37092424-6BF0EFA6-07AF-4ACF-87E7-3FA93BDAD211Q37134339-D117491B-0523-4E22-AD57-3035E8C631C6Q37150696-9148BBD9-E0FD-4B21-A8CE-63DD9908885DQ37156235-46DEFF1C-955C-4237-9CA4-C26BACC0E9D2Q37191906-867716FE-3B6E-48EB-8767-0A38422CF702Q37306807-ED6848AD-B8E4-4CC2-AC84-228E94340E60Q37344957-A73B75CB-F7CD-4AC0-95EC-B28EDB8CEB28Q37399530-389C13D5-3FF9-4804-88A4-9E66F7C88543Q37558945-E9DB1A8B-EBD5-4525-BA24-900E34EB1D45Q37636166-CCCDD572-3BEA-462B-A042-12E017E1941FQ37731375-8698FCB9-2FFC-4DD8-AE01-96ABD060F089Q38160157-53B701C4-E3C6-487A-BB23-FFCE7F26C770Q38370019-198B00DA-2896-48F4-87A6-5A8437265C8CQ38607728-C0834950-ED69-4A53-9439-AACF49DDBD70Q38613432-D30E6A70-C295-4AD4-A9B4-857C020DD7F4Q38658540-46D44F61-7679-4799-AEC8-08F215967135
P2860
A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
2012年论文
@zh
2012年论文
@zh-cn
name
A changing landscape of physic ...... ysicians over a 5-year period.
@ast
A changing landscape of physic ...... ysicians over a 5-year period.
@en
type
label
A changing landscape of physic ...... ysicians over a 5-year period.
@ast
A changing landscape of physic ...... ysicians over a 5-year period.
@en
prefLabel
A changing landscape of physic ...... ysicians over a 5-year period.
@ast
A changing landscape of physic ...... ysicians over a 5-year period.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
A changing landscape of physic ...... ysicians over a 5-year period.
@en
P2093
Ashish K Jha
Guodong Gordon Gao
Jeffrey S McCullough
Ritu Agarwal
P2860
P356
10.2196/JMIR.2003
P577
2012-02-24T00:00:00Z