Comparison of five diagnostic modalities for direct detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in patients with early Lyme disease.
about
Lyme DiseaseThe Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests for Lyme Disease in Humans, A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of North American ResearchBrazilian borreliosis with special emphasis on humans and horsesCollection and characterization of samples for establishment of a serum repository for lyme disease diagnostic test development and evaluation.Sensitive multiplex PCR assay to differentiate Lyme spirochetes and emerging pathogens Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia microti.Comparison of detection of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA and anti-Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies in patients with erythema migrans in north-eastern Poland.Laboratory diagnosis of Lyme disease: advances and challengesProgress in the molecular diagnosis of Lyme disease.Improved culture conditions for the growth and detection of Borrelia from human serum.Development of a metabolic biosignature for detection of early Lyme disease.CCL19 as a Chemokine Risk Factor for Posttreatment Lyme Disease Syndrome: a Prospective Clinical Cohort StudyAchieving molecular diagnostics for Lyme disease.Citrate anticoagulant improves the sensitivity of Borreliella (Borrelia) burgdorferi plasma culture.Detection and Differentiation of Lyme Spirochetes and Other Tick-Borne Pathogens from Blood Using Real-Time PCR with Molecular Beacons.T2 Magnetic Resonance Assay-Based Direct Detection of Three Lyme Disease-Related Borrelia Species in Whole-Blood Samples.Studies that report unexpected positive blood cultures for Lyme borrelia - are they valid?Evaluation of Modified 2-Tiered Serodiagnostic Testing Algorithms for Early Lyme Disease.Laboratory diagnostics for Lyme disease.
P2860
Q22250895-E6A133F7-24F8-4FC3-878C-46467308EF66Q28354112-5BE33076-9353-4C06-B1B5-08234C0FEA12Q28817750-93A198D1-B49B-44CB-8D86-F56C97439822Q34298182-78E91641-4922-46EE-BD12-9FB9C8544E11Q35073777-239B7421-68F2-4116-A827-30B5C991727FQ35178523-D14B027C-6B8A-43C6-9C0A-DB86E3CEABA0Q35638551-7EC4C072-01D8-4D7C-80F7-5CE32CD52C23Q36205210-CA55B644-3F25-4579-8104-B5B1FF440F8DQ36663368-FB7416C2-7380-4EAE-B18F-BCED06773B3FQ36737157-CEBFB59D-6549-4625-AE3C-AE29FD686FAAQ37239565-4E1A8D22-61C5-491B-AF04-1328F4681312Q38154932-679B710C-E68C-4E4C-8C10-A8F0DE17BD0DQ40063947-EA9CE46F-4280-4C2B-A047-D1A8040C539EQ40178121-3AACBEA7-BC01-4260-837A-0272C40D9AF7Q40190465-18D05D51-9F58-4E9F-A933-CD8FEE025028Q41997404-719A0C65-5626-402D-97D5-C8586EFB762AQ47920219-E4E3D51B-7FE0-4E0E-90D2-A7C8E26459EDQ54935781-A7AF1B15-8658-4D70-8FEA-CDEF98163076
P2860
Comparison of five diagnostic modalities for direct detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in patients with early Lyme disease.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Comparison of five diagnostic ...... ients with early Lyme disease.
@ast
Comparison of five diagnostic ...... ients with early Lyme disease.
@en
type
label
Comparison of five diagnostic ...... ients with early Lyme disease.
@ast
Comparison of five diagnostic ...... ients with early Lyme disease.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of five diagnostic ...... ients with early Lyme disease.
@ast
Comparison of five diagnostic ...... ients with early Lyme disease.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Comparison of five diagnostic ...... tients with early Lyme disease
@en
P2093
Denise Cooper
Diane Holmgren
Dionysios Liveris
Donna McKenna
Gary P Wormser
Ira Schwartz
John Nowakowski
Radha Iyer
Robert Nadelman
Susan Bittker
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.DIAGMICROBIO.2012.03.026
P577
2012-05-08T00:00:00Z