Is the Best Evidence Good Enough: Quality Assessment and Factor Analysis of Meta-Analyses on Depression
about
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psoriasis: role of funding sources, conflict of interest and bibliometric indices as predictors of methodological quality.
P2860
Is the Best Evidence Good Enough: Quality Assessment and Factor Analysis of Meta-Analyses on Depression
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年論文
@yue
2016年論文
@zh-hant
2016年論文
@zh-hk
2016年論文
@zh-mo
2016年論文
@zh-tw
2016年论文
@wuu
2016年论文
@zh
2016年论文
@zh-cn
name
Is the Best Evidence Good Enou ...... of Meta-Analyses on Depression
@ast
Is the Best Evidence Good Enou ...... of Meta-Analyses on Depression
@en
type
label
Is the Best Evidence Good Enou ...... of Meta-Analyses on Depression
@ast
Is the Best Evidence Good Enou ...... of Meta-Analyses on Depression
@en
prefLabel
Is the Best Evidence Good Enou ...... of Meta-Analyses on Depression
@ast
Is the Best Evidence Good Enou ...... of Meta-Analyses on Depression
@en
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Is the Best Evidence Good Enou ...... of Meta-Analyses on Depression
@en
P2093
Jiaojiao Hou
Meijuan Wang
Xinchun Mei
Yingbo Zhu
Zhongyong Shi
P2860
P304
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0157808
P407
P577
2016-06-23T00:00:00Z