Identifying studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests was difficult due to the poor sensitivity and precision of methodologic filters and the lack of information in the abstract.
about
Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stonesUltrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stonesEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stonesSearch strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASEThromboelastography (TEG) and thromboelastometry (ROTEM) for trauma-induced coagulopathy in adult trauma patients with bleedingSearch strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and EMBASEThe role of MRI in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease or other dementias in persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI)Cardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipientsCardiac testing for coronary artery disease in potential kidney transplant recipientsBrief alcohol questionnaires for identifying hazardous, harmful and dependent alcohol use in primary carePhysical examination for lumbar radiculopathy due to disc herniation in patients with low-back painSerum amylase and lipase and urinary trypsinogen and amylase for diagnosis of acute pancreatitisMagnetic resonance spectroscopy as a prognostic marker in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a study protocol for an individual patient data meta-analysis.An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall.Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews.The utility of clinical measures for the diagnosis of achilles tendon injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Chapter 4: effective search strategies for systematic reviews of medical tests.Performance of search strategies to retrieve systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy from the Cochrane Library.Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies.Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.Evaluation of PubMed filters used for evidence-based searching: validation using relative recall.Implications of applying methodological shortcuts to expedite systematic reviews: three case studies using systematic reviews from agri-food public health.Reporting methodological search filter performance comparisons: a literature review.Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for the diagnosis of hip femoroacetabular impingement/labral tear: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Clinical identifiers for detecting underlying closed cervical fractures.Serum C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and lactate dehydrogenase for the diagnosis of pancreatic necrosis.Amylase in drain fluid for the diagnosis of pancreatic leak in post-pancreatic resection.Diagnostic Accuracy of Imaging Modalities and Injection Techniques for the Diagnosis of Femoroacetabular Impingement/Labral Tear: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis.Development and use of a content search strategy for retrieving studies on patients' views and preferences.ACCURACY OF THE LEVER SIGN TO DIAGNOSE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT TEAR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS
P2860
Q24187882-D0FCECDD-454F-4D03-8CF4-4AB2502309ADQ24187889-C9A8B80E-5474-4D1A-962E-7B03392F2755Q24187893-735A4A54-7881-43B8-9620-34132FADFA56Q24198278-12B96E56-D88C-4DB2-BA54-B7A19981F6BAQ24200263-3C244894-399D-4940-8FAD-87AAEA0EBE5EQ24202291-4AC4DF08-7E7C-4642-B287-750EBE953B3AQ24203748-5A70CD44-2DBA-452F-91F8-329987F99C08Q24204028-1D24A8A5-4840-49A8-B9BF-D49A74C3E1D1Q24235620-124D4E1B-DBAB-49A9-9F1D-42AEA667D5C7Q24236619-6A3A7397-1B9B-4F72-898D-1A958E10A9EEQ24239954-332988EA-4CF0-49FC-8B3B-C40B7AD105C5Q29994579-0E44B208-D3DA-4113-A13E-CE6B80073BCFQ30683533-4261F1E2-1DD8-4543-A118-25FC2D7ED8CAQ33250587-8530ECB6-FA15-4545-A4C0-BF662D99BD6DQ34036655-D621441A-8009-45D9-81D3-9CD88F57F288Q34688618-1EC8D808-E9CA-49F9-8F05-C7C430257B86Q35999043-0B1017BF-7195-4849-85FF-D0BF2C4ED94FQ36010653-E67995F3-78D3-45CB-B7A1-19AF781E3FFBQ37188802-09C52DFE-3CE4-45B1-BEEF-D5A2735FF949Q37346962-D968DE6F-4508-4E84-A0C6-CE78AB25D23DQ37559298-8349B945-DFF6-43CD-999B-D3BB23E45060Q37560869-FDE15328-93C5-4A66-8257-563202DBFFDFQ38235900-1AF0C20A-02E4-41FB-9CEC-739FF5777923Q38291050-1A8AB0FA-9732-412A-927E-93A797A18AFDQ38452560-C76DFA8A-DEB8-4E20-B7D8-31BDADFDDE1AQ38826374-55604A9F-76A2-4774-B54C-CE55F4939D87Q38848609-B9AE0221-FF3D-407B-B9F7-3A43D01757B0Q38995076-5E955654-58B7-442A-ABC2-C41BA650CB70Q40066282-42B56C00-0B98-40ED-8354-E8E6B130A338Q57137008-28A46554-13FC-46E7-9496-5C526AD0CF03
P2860
Identifying studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests was difficult due to the poor sensitivity and precision of methodologic filters and the lack of information in the abstract.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年論文
@yue
2005年論文
@zh-hant
2005年論文
@zh-hk
2005年論文
@zh-mo
2005年論文
@zh-tw
2005年论文
@wuu
2005年论文
@zh
2005年论文
@zh-cn
name
Identifying studies for system ...... f information in the abstract.
@ast
Identifying studies for system ...... f information in the abstract.
@en
type
label
Identifying studies for system ...... f information in the abstract.
@ast
Identifying studies for system ...... f information in the abstract.
@en
prefLabel
Identifying studies for system ...... f information in the abstract.
@ast
Identifying studies for system ...... f information in the abstract.
@en
P50
P1476
Identifying studies for system ...... of information in the abstract
@en
P2093
Pietrzak E
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2004.09.011
P577
2005-05-01T00:00:00Z