about
Breast ultrasound diagnostic performance and outcomes for mass lesions using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 0 mammogram.Image registration for detection and quantification of change on digital tomosynthesis mammographic volumesUsing relative survival measures for cross-sectional and longitudinal benchmarks of countries, states, and districts: the BenchRelSurv- and BenchRelSurvPlot-macros.Distinguishing screening from diagnostic mammograms using Medicare claims data.How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model.Carbon footprinting of North American emergency medical services systems.Individualized computer-aided education in mammography based on user modeling: concept and preliminary experimentsRecommendation for short-interval follow-up examinations after a probably benign assessment: is clinical practice consistent with BI-RADS guidance?Assessing the effect of a true-positive recall case in screening mammography: does perceptual priming alter radiologists' performance?A multichannel time-domain scanning fluorescence mammograph: performance assessment and first in vivo results.Pursuing optimal thresholds to recommend breast biopsy by quantifying the value of tomosynthesis.Are there racial/ethnic disparities among women younger than 40 undergoing mammography?Auditing a breast MRI practice: performance measures for screening and diagnostic breast MRI.Retrieval boosted computer-aided diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications for breast cancerDiagnosis of second breast cancer events after initial diagnosis of early stage breast cancerBreast MRI BI-RADS assessments and abnormal interpretation rates by clinical indication in US community practices.Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United StatesRegularization in retrieval-driven classification of clustered microcalcifications for breast cancer.Developing a comprehensive database management system for organization and evaluation of mammography datasets.Percutaneous breast biopsy: effect on short-term quality of life.Presentation of similar images as a reference for distinction between benign and malignant masses on mammograms: analysis of initial observer study.Current and future clinical applications for optical imaging of cancer: from intraoperative surgical guidance to cancer screeningIf you don't find it often, you often don't find it: why some cancers are missed in breast cancer screeningMammographic assessment of a geographically defined population at a mastology referral hospital in São Paulo Brazil.Automated breast image classification using features from its discrete cosine transform.Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammographyAccuracy of short-interval follow-up mammograms by patient and radiologist characteristics.Timing of follow-up after abnormal screening and diagnostic mammograms.Mammographic interpretive volume and diagnostic mammogram interpretation performance in community practiceIdentifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study.Reactions to uncertainty and the accuracy of diagnostic mammography.Advanced Breast Imaging Availability by Screening Facility Characteristics.Do mammographic technologists affect radiologists' diagnostic mammography interpretative performance?Breast Density and Benign Breast Disease: Risk Assessment to Identify Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer.Facility characteristics do not explain higher false-positive rates in diagnostic mammography at facilities serving vulnerable women.Radiation Doses in Consecutive CT Examinations from Five University of California Medical Centers.Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the ArtEffects of digital mammography uptake on downstream breast-related care among older women.Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions.
P2860
Q30475901-851A6FEF-47EB-447F-A416-788EDEB176D4Q30487051-DAC8377C-F692-46B7-87EE-2F9810275CF1Q30537799-32B274BB-17A9-4D00-A257-96D2B99862E6Q30559155-E79F3BBC-8749-415B-9D8E-8A1BE8239478Q33370698-FA0121E3-8256-4941-8E32-F30120C8CF59Q33704328-347926C0-B326-4AD8-9656-BED9F53DD4A4Q33724300-D1F65832-29FB-4024-B532-BE4C6DA42332Q33818628-241B7F69-CFD4-41AE-88F3-4F51CD122AA8Q33823296-0CDE332B-7AB7-4A8F-8637-B1367E7CA6DDQ33832903-723B8103-5B6F-4233-B3B5-EBE25B0A7937Q33958483-9E3DE17E-49A9-43C5-81A0-0C01A684BEF6Q34082172-19245374-B58C-40A4-A668-EFC935D77FD9Q34145364-FF07612B-A683-4256-936A-96534C30EA55Q34155135-8139B628-D0E3-44A0-A3F9-B98005B1BBE3Q34292779-84898531-80B0-4953-AB27-B4EDEB54138EQ34324797-B5637986-1FFD-4897-A7F1-E47F0CC3F6C9Q34354391-9E207886-11EA-4CA6-8C73-6B2A0C46FEFBQ34392477-3E442464-B37C-4EDD-B084-F14BEC742CA5Q34427899-8108E353-B89B-4D58-AEAA-F0B44E72D312Q34495457-1933F3D7-9171-4017-8D87-029F5AFD79F1Q34614711-1B02725A-2795-4149-B15D-EF5A87C3F919Q34700347-D8B96CB8-E75B-4880-A9F1-AEC3F55F5521Q34758748-9E5E1050-A1DF-4E03-B532-63BD55ED9E07Q34997304-EDB78CC3-48A4-40C6-A6F1-D0ED3EBE1130Q35121782-CD48A4A0-5441-47FA-8B37-71DE18C061EAQ35131036-8B18399F-F60F-4686-A8A8-62E6AF27F754Q35140687-AFC22347-102A-44F1-9657-A31F55858209Q35150770-D1200FF0-9744-4A06-A42E-F6A5F210B802Q35629889-B7FE4231-CEE7-4FC9-8BC1-4BF7C282D0CFQ35646902-C3B908ED-7621-4F2B-BEC9-7826C7B89DD3Q35683110-685CF991-A1C6-4291-A23F-3A237F113C76Q35733123-3B84B4EA-8095-418D-AFCA-7EDCD59614A1Q35737378-21A3A4C0-6BFC-4EE2-975F-372548D84FC1Q36090967-B8F039B5-F519-4D30-9E67-BEA0D69C8602Q36174684-14428C41-8C2A-4A4E-9E2E-EDFD1F77EA0FQ36185823-B91EB884-55C1-4D9A-959D-C8DBC0A7E7F8Q36277707-71585E63-33FE-48D3-BBBC-63D30A72F4D2Q36336971-53FA1636-D4C8-462D-B4E7-6C90D5B4406AQ36388896-C3ED76B6-6700-4BDC-8E3F-22C3804CC81EQ36484992-F183F2DA-5060-4490-B140-F044736D8A40
P2860
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年論文
@yue
2005年論文
@zh-hant
2005年論文
@zh-hk
2005年論文
@zh-mo
2005年論文
@zh-tw
2005年论文
@wuu
2005年论文
@zh
2005年论文
@zh-cn
name
Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography.
@ast
Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography.
@en
type
label
Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography.
@ast
Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography.
@en
prefLabel
Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography.
@ast
Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography.
@en
P2093
P1433
P1476
Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography.
@en
P2093
Berta M Geller
Bonnie C Yankaskas
Diana L Miglioretti
Edward A Sickles
Jessica W T Leung
Robert D Rosenberg
P304
P356
10.1148/RADIOL.2353040738
P407
P577
2005-06-01T00:00:00Z