Are high-viscosity glass-ionomer cements inferior to silver amalgam as restorative materials for permanent posterior teeth? A Bayesian analysis.

about

Toxic effects of four kinds of dental restorative materials on fibroblast HGF-1 and impacts on expression of Bcl-2 and Bax genes

P2860

Q57786987-F3BEE3B5-0546-41AB-9685-A52D6343561E

P2860

Are high-viscosity glass-ionomer cements inferior to silver amalgam as restorative materials for permanent posterior teeth? A Bayesian analysis.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36140004

description

2015 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2015年の論文

@ja

2015年論文

@yue

2015年論文

@zh-hant

2015年論文

@zh-hk

2015年論文

@zh-mo

2015年論文

@zh-tw

2015年论文

@wuu

2015年论文

@zh

2015年论文

@zh-cn

name

Are high-viscosity glass-ionom ...... or teeth? A Bayesian analysis.

@ast

Are high-viscosity glass-ionom ...... or teeth? A Bayesian analysis.

@en

type

Item

label

Are high-viscosity glass-ionom ...... or teeth? A Bayesian analysis.

@ast

Are high-viscosity glass-ionom ...... or teeth? A Bayesian analysis.

@en

prefLabel

Are high-viscosity glass-ionom ...... or teeth? A Bayesian analysis.

@ast

Are high-viscosity glass-ionom ...... or teeth? A Bayesian analysis.

@en

P1476

Are high-viscosity glass-ionom ...... or teeth? A Bayesian analysis.

@en

P2860

Effectiveness of single-surface ART restorations in the permanent dentition: a meta-analysis

Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review

The ART approach: clinical aspects reviewed.

Research gaps identified during systematic reviews of clinical trials: glass-ionomer cements.

Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition.

Mechanical behavior of glass ionomer cements as a function of loading condition and mixing procedure.

Direct contra naïve-indirect comparison of clinical failure rates between high-viscosity GIC and conventional amalgam restorations: an empirical study.

Do Laboratory Results Concerning High-Viscosity Glass-Ionomers versus Amalgam for Tooth Restorations Indicate Similar Effect Direction and Magnitude than that of Controlled Clinical Trials? - A Meta-Epidemiological Study

Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations: a meta- analysis.

Failure rate of high-viscosity GIC based ART compared with that of conventional amalgam restorations--evidence from an update of a systematic review.

P2888

s12903-015-0108-5

P304

118

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1186/S12903-015-0108-5

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Steffen Mickenautsch

P577

2015-10-08T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

282665052

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1048977000

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

26449638

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

4599034

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Are high-viscosity glass-ionomer cements inferior to silver amalgam as restorative materials for permanent posterior teeth? A Bayesian analysis.

about

P2860

P2860

Are high-viscosity glass-ionomer cements inferior to silver amalgam as restorative materials for permanent posterior teeth? A Bayesian analysis.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P6179

P698

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2860

P2888

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P50

P577

P5875

P6179

P698

P932