A comparison of methods to estimate organ doses in CT when utilizing approximations to the tube current modulation function.
about
The feasibility of a regional CTDIvol to estimate organ dose from tube current modulated CT exams.The impact on CT dose of the variability in tube current modulation technology: a theoretical investigation.Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.Reduction in radiation doses from paediatric CT scans in Great Britain.Attenuation-based size metric for estimating organ dose to patients undergoing tube current modulated CT exams.Accuracy of Monte Carlo simulations compared to in-vivo MDCT dosimetry.Characterization of radiation dose from tube current modulated CT examinations with considerations of both patient size and variable tube current.Do we need 3D tube current modulation information for accurate organ dosimetry in chest CT? Protocols dose comparisons.Estimating patient dose from CT exams that use automatic exposure control: Development and validation of methods to accurately estimate tube current values.Estimating organ doses from tube current modulated CT examinations using a generalized linear model.A study of the midpoint dose to CTDIvol ratio: Implications for CT dose evaluation.Development of a method to estimate organ doses for pediatric CT examinations.Image quality and dose optimisation for infant CT using a paediatric phantom.Validation of a Monte Carlo model used for simulating tube current modulation in computed tomography over a wide range of phantom conditions/challenges.Breast dose reduction with organ-based, wide-angle tube current modulated CT.Effect of tube current modulation for dose estimation using a simulation tool on body CT examination.Use of PET/CT instead of CT-only when planning for radiation therapy does not notably increase life years lost in children being treated for cancer.
P2860
Q33941285-8C82160A-7B8E-4107-ADA9-A56D2D2177D2Q34093595-77D2E94D-93FD-40EA-AF84-C03E93B43F5DQ35233268-B637CCC7-FA2D-4661-9C28-3307D8F3894DQ36839158-CBEB074F-619D-46D0-A9FF-7AE3B842FD25Q38344479-36FCA3E7-5164-4905-A802-769961FAE795Q38344482-3EC6628A-F398-4EF0-8999-813A776D12BEQ38691695-D3421A0A-E382-426A-A789-0CFDC96C8F59Q38773696-B2A80D50-4B3C-4A82-A491-D00AEF422EA3Q38801038-ADC031DA-4541-4E2B-859D-2DBCEDD1E918Q39005895-97D10BAF-C459-47E6-834E-8FDCF2175F3EQ39223344-D53563F7-3BCE-4D3C-B89F-E16305504CA4Q39793440-951CE046-17DE-494A-A55D-F9158C4D36AAQ40610062-B1980341-78DE-402A-878B-7CCC49AF1BB6Q46076214-87AD9670-DD6C-4034-BA4E-7E218353AFDEQ47799162-7010BB88-8F7A-46D3-AEE1-13D6575AFF2CQ51006776-4601E670-1730-456F-A59C-D55DFAE822F2Q51102599-EEC4DC04-2094-45C4-8CA8-D9BB9D5DCC18
P2860
A comparison of methods to estimate organ doses in CT when utilizing approximations to the tube current modulation function.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
2012年论文
@zh
2012年论文
@zh-cn
name
A comparison of methods to est ...... e current modulation function.
@ast
A comparison of methods to est ...... e current modulation function.
@en
type
label
A comparison of methods to est ...... e current modulation function.
@ast
A comparison of methods to est ...... e current modulation function.
@en
prefLabel
A comparison of methods to est ...... e current modulation function.
@ast
A comparison of methods to est ...... e current modulation function.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
A comparison of methods to est ...... e current modulation function.
@en
P2093
Chris H Cagnon
Dianna Cody
Hyun J Kim
John J Demarco
Kelsey Mathieu
Maryam Khatonabadi
P2860
P304
P356
10.1118/1.4736807
P407
P577
2012-08-01T00:00:00Z