The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis.
about
Platelet satellitism in infectious disease?ICSH recommendations for identification, diagnostic value, and quantitation of schistocytes.Are the review criteria for automated complete blood counts of the International Society of Laboratory Hematology suitable for all hematology laboratories?Historical data decrease complete blood count reflex blood smear review rates without missing patients with acute leukaemia.Purpose and criteria for blood smear scan, blood smear examination, and blood smear reviewFlow cytometric white blood cell differential using CytoDiff is excellent for counting blasts.Reliable, accurate determination of the leukocyte differential of leukopenic samples by using Hematoflow method.Rate of manual leukocyte differentials in dog, cat and horse blood samples using ADVIA 120 cytograms.Performance of the CellaVision(®) DM96 system for detecting red blood cell morphologic abnormalitiesAn audit of the indications for the reporting of blood films: results from the National Pathology Benchmarking StudyFlagging performance of the Sysmex XN2000 haematology analyser.Best practice in primary care pathology: review 7.Evaluation of nucleated red blood cell count by Sysmex XE-2100 in patients with thalassaemia or sickle cell anaemia and in neonatesObjective evaluation of analyzer performance based on a retrospective meta-analysis of instrument validation studies: point-of-care hematology analyzers.Optimization of laboratory workflow in clinical hematology laboratory with reduced manual slide review: comparison between Sysmex XE-2100 and ABX Pentra DX120.Toward a reference method for leukocyte differential counts in blood: comparison of three flow cytometric candidate methods.Pertinence of the Sysmex XE-5000™ parameters: rule of slide review in a context of 'normal' lymphocyte count (defined from control and mantle cell lymphoma blood specimens).The usefulness of blast flags on the Sysmex XE-5000 is questionable.Initial performance evaluation of the UniCel® DxH slide maker/stainer Coulter® cellular analysis system.Criteria for reflex peripheral smear review in infants.Acute leukemia detection rate by automated blood count parameters and peripheral smear review.Leukocytosis.Performance evaluation of the new hematology analyzer Sysmex XN-series.White blood cell differential counts in severely leukopenic samples: a comparative analysis of different solutions available in modern laboratory hematology.ICSH recommendations for the standardization of nomenclature and grading of peripheral blood cell morphological features.Single-step preparation and image-based counting of minute volumes of human blood.A prolonged microscopic observation improves detection of underpopulated cells in peripheral blood smears.Refining peripheral blood smear review rules for neonatal inpatients in a South African academic laboratory.Appropriateness of diagnostics tests.Analytical comparison between two hematological analyzer systems: CAL-8000 vs. XN-9000.Validation rules for blood smear revision after automated hematological testing using Mindray CAL-8000.The use of CellaVision™ DM96 in the verification of the presence of blasts in samples flagged by the Sysmex XE-5000.The utility of peripheral blood smear review for identifying specimens for flow cytometric immunophenotyping.Usefulness of thresholds for smear review of neutropenic samples analyzed with a Sysmex XN-10 analyzer.Performance of automated slidemakers and stainers in a working laboratory environment - routine operation and quality control.Performance of CellaVision DM96 in leukocyte classification.Clinical performance evaluation of the CellaVision Image Capture System in the white blood cell differential on peripheral blood smears.ICSH guidelines for the evaluation of blood cell analysers including those used for differential leucocyte and reticulocyte counting.Evaluation of the accuracy of the CellaVision™ DM96 in a high HIV-prevalence population in South AfricaPeripheral Smear Review and Bone Marrow Biopsy Correlation.
P2860
Q28264046-1151C931-DF75-40C6-92A8-D980E41ED7D1Q33398214-3935E13D-4AD0-4BE2-9C0D-752D669F5B93Q33945023-6A62995A-6412-4BFC-A13A-6872D3060B85Q34625207-E8A6407E-99B7-4416-8DE7-73F7991CBCD3Q34647155-71DC9EC7-368C-4560-8664-10BB5B751344Q34749677-F393A3D5-8748-47FF-B90B-4FA4688491C6Q35085493-73826DB3-A6B7-4CF9-8151-6B77490C13F6Q35182655-EF08202F-329D-41AE-9DC9-F2E47EDCEC88Q35577893-1D0B5ECE-C8FF-42D9-A0F9-FC66256D40C3Q35769628-85132935-DB57-43A1-878C-BDA54DC452B0Q35908747-F05E6628-A585-433B-8972-EF2AF89227EFQ36014419-DE2B9E4C-C88D-4EB3-8168-BA72A58A3ED0Q36220059-A508862B-345A-41EB-97AA-C43D155CF5B7Q36362070-CFABFEF3-71BA-492A-A576-A53EA8C30F46Q37854882-EC5C82B9-F272-4702-A72A-DC425C3DBD62Q38021969-F02BF76F-B9D1-432D-A71E-8F23BAD750DCQ38070927-8BEF358F-0476-4B7C-BB69-D491B5CDF4AFQ38099820-A1982799-8D36-4BD0-A403-9C0AC6E496D2Q38136740-6771A8B9-986F-44F6-8C9F-76203BF05B80Q38197713-18AE02D0-F9C4-4E07-85B4-1793D5B71A7EQ38202224-1D5D2D37-8710-4B98-A1EF-7E2627651981Q38205948-D66B12E6-1FF3-41A0-940E-A413E7F2DFC3Q38210768-24EC8021-3E80-4A85-9800-CF04B55EBE8CQ38229611-65F4C502-65F4-4DAB-9130-254A39E1B63BQ38366540-554F3EEE-E009-4BC8-A8E7-4D4FF1C65937Q38396953-810054CB-D53B-42E3-B3E7-FF1F93919A3EQ38656041-3E7E0E27-DEFE-4EE5-87D9-49B593ECBDCAQ38810490-68FCDE81-D549-49C3-8195-79B6C5FBD385Q38830204-6BF1E363-FC05-4FAD-9794-195A7BE88B98Q38905869-9130E93D-8EFF-47CE-B307-6CA8A3A4756EQ38973417-7D15EC43-E4AA-4EA3-8925-45EE52849E09Q39195682-CBB04723-98FA-4046-A957-946CB598C15FQ39266378-A1756ECE-F596-417D-8249-73B6826C953AQ39369548-97491EAC-0D14-4C55-9064-DD471E093CF5Q39842954-E671BCF2-39E7-4662-A725-16C742B3F106Q40124757-8955B969-B5DE-4AB5-9EAC-8AC9FDD69B8AQ40137937-F082588F-17BC-45D7-9941-FDE9AED75640Q40179986-58B96259-BE6F-4E23-8BBF-095BF10B906BQ40503179-C1457B0B-D5E5-4284-B7B8-4F94B99DB6FAQ41177185-AB58050E-6D80-44C3-8D96-4202A31B63F9
P2860
The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年論文
@yue
2005年論文
@zh-hant
2005年論文
@zh-hk
2005年論文
@zh-mo
2005年論文
@zh-tw
2005年论文
@wuu
2005年论文
@zh
2005年论文
@zh-cn
name
The international consensus gr ...... and WBC differential analysis.
@ast
The international consensus gr ...... and WBC differential analysis.
@en
type
label
The international consensus gr ...... and WBC differential analysis.
@ast
The international consensus gr ...... and WBC differential analysis.
@en
prefLabel
The international consensus gr ...... and WBC differential analysis.
@ast
The international consensus gr ...... and WBC differential analysis.
@en
P2093
P356
P1433
P1476
The international consensus gr ...... and WBC differential analysis.
@en
P2093
P W Barnes
S J Machin
S L McFadden
international consensus group for hematology
P356
10.1532/LH96.05019
P577
2005-01-01T00:00:00Z