Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.
about
The influence of the team in conducting a systematic review.A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals.Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.Review of reviews on exposures to synthetic organic chemicals and children's neurodevelopment: Methodological and interpretation challenges.Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psoriasis: role of funding sources, conflict of interest and bibliometric indices as predictors of methodological quality.Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies
P2860
Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年論文
@yue
2016年論文
@zh-hant
2016年論文
@zh-hk
2016年論文
@zh-mo
2016年論文
@zh-tw
2016年论文
@wuu
2016年论文
@zh
2016年论文
@zh-cn
name
Poor methodological quality an ...... views in burn care management.
@ast
Poor methodological quality an ...... views in burn care management.
@en
type
label
Poor methodological quality an ...... views in burn care management.
@ast
Poor methodological quality an ...... views in burn care management.
@en
prefLabel
Poor methodological quality an ...... views in burn care management.
@ast
Poor methodological quality an ...... views in burn care management.
@en
P2860
P50
P356
P1476
Poor methodological quality an ...... views in burn care management.
@en
P2093
Clovis M Faggion
Nicholas Goodwin
P2860
P304
P356
10.1111/IWJ.12692
P577
2016-12-18T00:00:00Z