Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials.
about
Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approachQuantitative imaging in cancer evolution and ecologyMR Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical TrialsStrategies for modern biomarker and drug development in oncology.Errors in Quantitative Image Analysis due to Platform-Dependent Image Scaling.Demonstration of nonlinearity bias in the measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in multicenter trials.Prediction of clinical phenotypes in invasive breast carcinomas from the integration of radiomics and genomics data.Metadata-driven Clinical Data Loading into i2b2 for Clinical and Translational Science Institutes.Radiomic feature clusters and prognostic signatures specific for Lung and Head & Neck cancer.Methods and challenges in quantitative imaging biomarker developmentClinical utility of quantitative imaging.Do 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in oropharyngeal and oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas indicate HPV status?Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tumor Response to Therapy.Correction of Gradient Nonlinearity Bias in Quantitative Diffusion Parameters of Renal Tissue with Intra Voxel Incoherent MotionPrognostic value of FDG PET/CT-based metabolic tumor volumes in metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients18F-FDG-PET/CT parameters as imaging biomarkers in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma, is visual analysis of PET and contrast enhanced CT better than the numbers?Applications and limitations of radiomicsQIN DAWG Validation of Gradient Nonlinearity Bias Correction Workflow for Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Multicenter TrialsDynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer clinical trials: potential roles and possible pitfalls.Radiology and Enterprise Medical Imaging Extensions (REMIX).Managers of Molecular Imaging Laboratories (MOMIL) Interest Group.Accuracy, repeatability, and interplatform reproducibility of T1 quantification methods used for DCE-MRI: Results from a multicenter phantom study.Translation in solid cancer: are size-based response criteria an anachronism?Targeting Hypoxia to Improve Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Outcome.Radiomic features analysis in computed tomography images of lung nodule classification.Compartment modeling of dynamic brain PET--the impact of scatter corrections on parameter errors.Special Section Guest Editorial: Quantitative Imaging and the Pioneering Efforts of Laurence P. Clarke.Feasibility of state of the art PET/CT systems performance harmonisation.Validating the Imaging Biomarker: The Proof of Efficacy and Effectiveness
P2860
Q23760721-08426117-D286-4620-9FD8-C50961C69E19Q27016021-1CF5F311-3EEB-4E65-A4E8-E28EDE070522Q30364608-924A45D7-A55E-422F-AC84-962D0AFCDE6BQ30590270-C1465E52-FF13-41F0-BC4F-D7D16D3BB8F9Q30810422-B6424B50-5351-4A16-B015-EA23F999FCC1Q30944029-D238F0A0-825A-4D7E-A323-0B57C445F281Q31042155-1E974A21-9C7B-4C73-B013-5803EDE83563Q31124858-B4D036BF-6B34-4745-815D-48858762F4E5Q34488635-50B71404-DB1E-4528-9FBB-07226A9F0A96Q34648114-289C0F8C-D288-4105-A00D-8862EDE739B0Q34656915-8BCB44FD-8E2E-409A-A6B9-B4EB0E3870BCQ35178830-ED9EF830-ABE1-47D7-BC82-F22EDD9538A2Q36123378-464A094C-CABF-4DEB-969A-19F0B4891C51Q36493911-13CB07F9-12E9-4AD3-9B9B-7B2D9EB87C07Q36874902-6ED3B341-1E12-4FBE-BC80-2613E962294FQ37052473-A4D96881-68D8-470A-86A1-C594F194BCD2Q37052862-32D9B8EA-4474-411B-B43A-319C3A70AF98Q37590329-578D37EF-FCEF-4DFB-B602-F5A14E45404DQ37721529-22999E4E-9C8F-414C-89AB-4DD934F5BBCEQ38608781-ACB39689-3AFD-45C2-AED9-30F71E3C496AQ39181314-C9417489-9CA1-4C9A-BD38-F2018133C7CFQ46555772-C1ED94E3-04AB-4BDA-AF7C-6BA45F15B34EQ47445819-F60D9013-6674-4BBB-AEDC-9B921041792CQ47769995-F83F8B08-251B-4AC9-B745-11008D89B3E5Q48041780-18FB9034-3935-4516-8704-BC5C4F4E0CD8Q48465675-22FE4830-74A1-4246-B9D3-04D3269660EEQ50031471-DC7748F9-4050-46DF-9B14-2BE37EF2C837Q52676354-D89EBA9E-1B14-4A49-B671-02A6C22C57BDQ59308876-59906E7A-A51C-45BD-91EF-D1C532BC8EAD
P2860
Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年学术文章
@wuu
2012年学术文章
@zh-cn
2012年学术文章
@zh-hans
2012年学术文章
@zh-my
2012年学术文章
@zh-sg
2012年學術文章
@yue
2012年學術文章
@zh
2012年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials.
@ast
Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials.
@en
type
label
Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials.
@ast
Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials.
@en
prefLabel
Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials.
@ast
Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials.
@en
P2093
P2860
P50
P1476
Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials
@en
P2093
Christopher W Ryan
Edward A Eikman
Elizabeth R Gerstner
Fiona M Fennessy
Frank S Lieberman
James M Mountz
Kenneth M Forster
Lawrence H Schwartz
Richard L Wahl
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.MRI.2012.06.009
P577
2012-08-13T00:00:00Z