Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning.
about
The design evolution of interbody cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic reviewEvaluation of anterior cervical reconstruction with titanium mesh cages versus nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide66 cages after 1- or 2-level corpectomy for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study of 117 patients.Current concepts of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a review of literature.Risk factors for subsidence in anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a review of 82 cases and 182 levels.Plate augmentation in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cage for degenerative cervical spinal disordersMonosegmental fixation for the treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar spineComparison between Two Different Cervical Interbody Fusion Cages in One Level Stand-alone ACDF: Carbon Fiber Composite Frame Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage.Is the radiographic subsidence of stand-alone cages associated with adverse clinical outcomes after cervical spine fusion? An observational cohort study with 2-year follow-up outcome scoring.Subsidence and nonunion after anterior cervical interbody fusion using a stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cageEfficacy of PEEK cages and plate augmentation in three-level anterior cervical fusion of elderly patients.Anterior lumbar interbody implants: importance of the interdevice distanceComparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up.Comparison of Operating Time between Stand-alone Cage and a Standard Method for a Single Level Cervical Disc DiseaseTitanium mesh cage fracture after lumbar reconstruction surgery: a case report and literature review.Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective studyIs PEEK cage better than titanium cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery? A meta-analysis.The new Zero-P implant can effectively reduce the risk of postoperative dysphagia and complications compared with the traditional anterior cage and plate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Factors affecting sagittal malalignment due to cage subsidence in standalone cage assisted anterior cervical fusion.Three- and four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a PEEK cage and plate construct.Anterior cervical fusion with interbody cage containing beta-tricalcium phosphate augmented with plate fixation: a prospective randomized study with 2-year follow-up.Clinical outcomes of two types of cages used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases: n-HA/PA66 cages versus PEEK cagesAnterior Cervical Reconstruction Using Free Vascularized Fibular Graft after Cervical Corpectomy.Comparative Analysis of Interbody Cages Versus Tricortical Graft with Anterior Plate Fixation for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease.Stand-Alone Cages for Anterior Cervical Fusion: Are There No Problems?Long-Term Follow-Up Results of Anterior Cervical Inter-Body Fusion with Stand-Alone CagesAnterior cervical fusion using the IntExt combined cage/plate.Integrated intervertebral device for anterior cervical fusion: An initial experience.Anterior cervical fusion for radicular-disc conflict performed by three different procedures: clinical and radiographic analysis at long-term follow-upSurgical Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Fusion Using Deminaralized Bone Matrix as Stand-Alone Graft Material: Single Arm, Pilot Study.The impact of menopause on bone fusion after the single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusionThe effects of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone cages at two contiguous levels on cervical alignment and outcomes.Clinical and radiological outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone empty polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.Cervical arthroplasty: the beginning, the middle, the end?Radiologic Assessment of Subsidence in Stand-Alone Cervical Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cage.Titanium/Polyetheretherketone Cages for Cervical Arthrodesis with Degenerative and Traumatic Pathologies: Early Clinical Outcomes and Fusion Rates.The Effect of Uncinate Process Resection on Subsidence Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.A Lower T1 Slope as a Predictor of Subsidence in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Stand-Alone Cages.Usefulness of anterior cervical fusion using titanium interbody cage for treatment of cervical degenerative disease with preoperative segmental kyphosis.Comparison of zero-profile anchored spacer versus plate-cage construct in treatment of cervical spondylosis with regard to clinical outcomes and incidence of major complications: a meta-analysis.Subsidence of Cylindrical Cage (AMSLUtrade mark Cage) : Postoperative 1 Year Follow-up of the Cervical Anterior Interbody Fusion.
P2860
Q26849698-0BB58AE9-D0F9-4BDC-AB98-0FCE6025194CQ33560215-39F5C89E-1B4A-4E30-9545-411EF9C373E0Q34112404-D6B90282-189F-4FF8-83DE-FC60DEFAA278Q34208606-26F455DE-C24D-4903-BC70-D31CA0637274Q34337919-60AC1681-9B09-4F1B-98C6-69B5B4647A06Q34339486-077EAF99-ED7A-4B09-BB1A-69B58A3E12CFQ34390930-BE2C2A28-06C2-4490-B417-D2BDE2F749A0Q34527984-76F46974-6550-4B2F-8089-420F03748358Q34588463-0345DB7F-4219-4683-851A-F021225D0983Q34588529-1865CB7B-97A2-4181-A8E3-8FE13B90899AQ35296351-83F03282-D7DA-49D9-A747-E1E0259B3F6BQ35602105-C9318BEB-96B4-4EF5-8261-782F0F9A0C1CQ35608333-261A6EC2-6085-4BF7-88CD-B4CA21C3D247Q35791904-12E071F8-E8C1-4FBB-8149-9899DE2DFF7EQ36074191-A4DFD9FD-8684-4851-85E6-22996FC7D680Q36120322-5530F1B4-E0B4-48F3-B886-A8F774933590Q36166948-5CAEFA73-1193-41AA-ADFB-34025BA132B4Q36384430-761299A2-6C7F-4AE0-A3E8-7A5A97064455Q36428547-FDE9CFCB-D4CC-40D5-9C05-E9696A14DFB0Q36632683-F15E736E-3543-42EF-9CD1-B25180DD5957Q36809355-DE513270-71E1-409F-ACEF-19A185E8E0DEQ36813416-CDAB924A-4EAB-4132-A901-F30C2F2BF4BAQ36831229-6AB514D2-4F49-483A-B61D-D773571F4C9FQ36834580-B5B344C9-3E21-40C6-B431-7E96C9103518Q37112583-EF37C7B8-AA5B-4C7E-A4C3-7E3ECDE493A0Q37153398-582CE587-EF43-4741-9416-58274838D8EFQ37183168-1D82ECAF-1FD3-4CA6-B1FF-6F033A953660Q37313818-5EBB4307-056F-4FB1-8E21-1E1206896482Q37378513-84B9EEA1-17E8-48AC-BED5-7D9EEDBE516EQ37578077-0629B439-7F15-4AB5-802A-D5BCE31B75CAQ38479080-1437C8B0-C317-4D18-8C9D-DFFC763D899CQ38653650-09C204E4-FE67-47F6-91E9-F04946D80C79Q39721130-C4E49F94-F24D-482A-A9BD-96310851A72CQ39868996-1749510B-B3F5-472C-AE63-B25BBE6A97EDQ39877666-FEC57EA5-D1BF-4FF8-9B5D-0302ACFF6E5EQ41271125-43AFA0B8-BE6B-46E7-B58D-76C5BA5F2FDFQ41271552-89780379-8371-4842-A98A-B69DCC2E842EQ41390438-12CA04EA-F04A-4A6F-A76C-6F9847D791BFQ41505550-B0E0DF2E-0681-49B9-9918-E59F6033ECE8Q41610562-EB403101-2DFC-41D9-92FC-EB181D031741
P2860
Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年学术文章
@wuu
2003年学术文章
@zh-cn
2003年学术文章
@zh-hans
2003年学术文章
@zh-my
2003年学术文章
@zh-sg
2003年學術文章
@yue
2003年學術文章
@zh
2003年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning.
@ast
Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning.
@en
type
label
Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning.
@ast
Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning.
@en
prefLabel
Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning.
@ast
Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning.
@en
P2093
Dante Marchesi
Erol Gercek
Josee Delisle
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00586-003-0539-6
P577
2003-06-21T00:00:00Z