Challenges in Australian policy processes for disinvestment from existing, ineffective health care practices.
about
Identifying low-value clinical practices in critical care medicine: protocol for a scoping reviewTowards understanding the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices: a scoping reviewHealth technology reassessment: the art of the possibleUsing Economic Evidence to Set Healthcare Priorities in Low-Income and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Methodological Frameworks.A systematic review on current status of health technology reassessment: insights for South KoreaSustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 2: identifying opportunities for disinvestment in a local healthcare settingCurrent status of health technology reassessment of non-drug technologies: survey and key informant interviews.Developing a framework to guide the de-adoption of low-value clinical practices in acute care medicine: a study protocol.Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 6: investigating methods to identify, prioritise, implement and evaluate disinvestment projects in a local healthcare setting.Reorienting programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) towards disinvestmentThe effectiveness of a de-implementation strategy to reduce low-value blood management techniques in primary hip and knee arthroplasty: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trialSustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 7: supporting staff in evidence-based decision-making, implementation and evaluation in a local healthcare setting.Organizational readiness for innovation in health care: some lessons from the recent literature.Disentangling rhetoric and reality: an international Delphi study of factors and processes that facilitate the successful implementation of decisions to decommission healthcare services.Processes, contexts, and rationale for disinvestment: a protocol for a critical interpretive synthesis.Study protocol for two randomized controlled trials examining the effectiveness and safety of current weekend allied health services and a new stakeholder-driven model for acute medical/surgical patients versus no weekend allied health services.Usage of an online tool to help policymakers better engage with research: Web CIPHER.Using conjoint analysis to develop a system to score research engagement actions by health decision makers.De-adoption and its 43 related terms: harmonizing low-value care terminology.Using conjoint analysis to develop a system of scoring policymakers' use of research in policy and program development.FROM TALK TO ACTION: POLICY STAKEHOLDERS, APPROPRIATENESS, AND SELECTIVE DISINVESTMENT.The effect of an educational intervention on meperidine use in Nova Scotia, Canada: a time series analysis.The Life Cycle of Health Technologies. Challenges and Ways Forward.Breaking up is hard to do: the economic impact of provisional funding contingent upon evidence development.Engaging clinicians in evidence-based disinvestment: role and perceptions of evidence.Health technology reassessment of non-drug technologies: current practices.Analysis of evidence supporting the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina reimbursement medicines lists: role of the WHO Essential Medicines List, Cochrane systematic reviews and technology assessment reports.Disinvestment and Value-Based Purchasing Strategies for Pharmaceuticals: An International Review.DRUG DISINVESTMENT FRAMEWORKS: COMPONENTS, CHALLENGES, AND SOLUTIONS.DISINVESTING FROM INEFFECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES: LESSONS LEARNED FROM CURRENT PROGRAMS.HEALTH TECHNOLOGY DISINVESTMENT WORLDWIDE: OVERVIEW OF PROGRAMS AND POSSIBLE DETERMINANTS.Challenges and opportunities for disinvestment in Australia.Bioethics, health technology reassessment, and management.La bioéthique, la réévaluation des technologies de la santé et la gestion.Tackling disinvestment in health care services. The views of resource allocators in the English NHS.Potential of geographical variation analysis for realigning providers to value-based care. ECHO case study on lower-value indications of C-section in five European countries.Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 9: conceptualising disinvestment in the local healthcare setting.Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 10: operationalising disinvestment in a conceptual framework for resource allocation.Achieving optimal technology use: A proposed model for health technology reassessment.Affordability of comprehensive community health worker programmes in rural sub-Saharan Africa
P2860
Q26778161-5DAFDF9A-0340-44F4-AE9D-755C043FF90FQ26786656-54F081D7-4285-4D92-B85B-0F42479E91FCQ27002134-92E0AA82-8E60-46EA-A3AB-51551DBE917FQ28074172-6AFAE351-3E37-456B-BA1A-11CEFDC6EB0EQ28077719-27B11B90-EED4-426C-8AEB-D4474D69C89EQ29994821-84BADE98-1622-4DD3-8D98-2A652705670FQ30532042-71E4C043-7C30-4741-A970-674511A0346BQ30835657-45905C9D-92BE-4AC6-B160-7B088E20220EQ30853586-188A2FFC-3933-445A-9D14-E532920EC3D5Q33717599-A703C4F6-7117-4F4C-83C4-6DBA23BB89C7Q33742427-A9FFB8DB-C3CB-43EC-B975-68DF9639CF0CQ33823627-09525A1C-10B5-43A8-B4B1-C64586025A68Q34229073-B3ABA301-B3E5-4CA4-AC04-92FF233505FAQ34234049-CF8DDE60-A37C-4843-8B72-BAC5DEAB1F00Q34752010-3570BA89-EA06-4317-9127-A1F60A640AB1Q35491648-EEA438D4-46B7-41F2-94BB-1B293D60DF55Q35568787-6D86DA4C-A1AB-4284-AE0F-B5F0078EB193Q35645612-8AF8EC19-4179-49B0-9757-0FD3F5169949Q35815256-759B9345-3F33-44C1-8F08-C9E30425727CQ35910792-BA16754B-9F03-4813-AB70-2F29D5AB0C20Q36397945-606F06A6-2C26-4F29-A1E4-020DA3D81D26Q37104533-A54C3535-8C51-4F4D-8C3E-F981532DA7A4Q37601340-E9A56230-D29B-4ECC-8866-F0A2EBC53254Q37912286-0FF68CA3-6AC0-4562-8EF5-238D4F8766D5Q38043658-1FC0939D-1FA1-42BA-B881-89F72B3671A5Q38043659-BFD381ED-A7C7-4553-A67B-06A4A4B0917BQ38468322-734C6C15-6184-44C4-B181-3020ABC81D66Q38517704-D9510571-F809-43DD-B078-7A0C9081C061Q38658334-9CD2FFB2-4049-4818-923F-2F6FDCB7F8CBQ38676374-8125CB97-746F-4C2D-B2FA-82EB6C8664BEQ38697984-A44C2D93-01A4-44B1-A673-D5B2DEFEE61FQ38796496-D1887403-0B5B-4C5E-937E-E9447A45AC6DQ38981649-9E59D70D-0904-47CC-A15C-0CECA9D345B7Q38997060-812C8B2A-D15A-4E71-8354-BC47CC941A23Q39273040-889F3ACD-7A78-457B-9D08-AA98363EF5B9Q41413999-E2BD2A58-E60D-4792-A36C-5B41A0ACA9FDQ41467201-412AB8A6-AAF8-4CFC-8DFA-73ECC4AFF26FQ41522866-24B47569-D7C2-43ED-BC29-640296E5B510Q41767850-D41AD421-D8AF-47FD-B53E-18E335306235Q42368556-A171E825-8D45-4DC8-B285-C9239E387EA6
P2860
Challenges in Australian policy processes for disinvestment from existing, ineffective health care practices.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年学术文章
@wuu
2007年学术文章
@zh-cn
2007年学术文章
@zh-hans
2007年学术文章
@zh-my
2007年学术文章
@zh-sg
2007年學術文章
@yue
2007年學術文章
@zh
2007年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Challenges in Australian polic ...... fective health care practices.
@ast
Challenges in Australian polic ...... fective health care practices.
@en
type
label
Challenges in Australian polic ...... fective health care practices.
@ast
Challenges in Australian polic ...... fective health care practices.
@en
prefLabel
Challenges in Australian polic ...... fective health care practices.
@ast
Challenges in Australian polic ...... fective health care practices.
@en
P2860
P356
P1476
Challenges in Australian polic ...... fective health care practices.
@en
P2093
John R Moss
Sean R Tunis
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/1743-8462-4-23
P577
2007-10-31T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1038543411