Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses.

about

Case - Laparoscopic transperitoneal partial nephrectomy of T3a renal cell carcinoma within a horseshoe kidney.

P2860

Q50186844-334BD6E2-DA95-486E-A8A9-99DB771AD557

P2860

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36366748

description

2017 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2017年の論文

@ja

2017年学术文章

@wuu

2017年学术文章

@zh-cn

2017年学术文章

@zh-hans

2017年学术文章

@zh-my

2017年学术文章

@zh-sg

2017年學術文章

@yue

2017年學術文章

@zh

2017年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses.

@ast

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses.

@en

type

Item

label

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses.

@ast

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses.

@en

prefLabel

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses.

@ast

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses.

@en

P1476

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses

@en

P2093

Anne Cleves

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Arkadiusz Miernik

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Laura-Maria Krabbe

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Mario Walther

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Nils Kroeger

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Philipp Dahm

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Stefanie Schmidt

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinically localized renal masses

What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?

GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

Comparison of oncologic outcomes between partial and radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Overall survival advantage with partial nephrectomy: a bias of observational data?

Minimally invasive management of the small renal tumor: review of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and ablative techniques.

Clinical practice. Small renal mass.

Nephrectomy induced chronic renal insufficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death and death from any cause in patients with localized cT1b renal masses.

Comparison of Partial and Radical Nephrectomy for pT1b Renal Cell Carcinoma.

P304

CD012045

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1002/14651858.CD012045.PUB2

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Frank Kunath

P577

2017-05-09T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

28485814

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

6481491

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses.

about

P2860

P2860

Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses.

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P478

P50

P577

P698

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P478

P50

P577

P698

P932