Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study.

Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36372647

about

Early developed ASD (adjacent segmental disease) in patients after surgical treatment of the spine due to cancer metastases Comparative biomechanical investigation of a modular dynamic lumbar stabilization system and the Dynesys system Molecular MR imaging for the evaluation of the effect of dynamic stabilization on lumbar intervertebral discs.Segment-by-segment stabilization for degenerative disc disease: a hybrid technique Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part II. No clinical benefit for asymptomatic, initially degenerated adjacent segments after 6 years follow-up Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion.A novel approach to the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniations: indications of simple discectomy and posterior transpedicular dynamic stabilization based on carragee classification.Effects of cord pretension and stiffness of the Dynesys system spacer on the biomechanics of spinal decompression- a finite element study.An in vivo kinematic comparison of dynamic lumbar stabilization to lumbar discectomy and posterior lumbar fusion using radiostereometric analysis.Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis Effect of the cord pretension of the Dynesys dynamic stabilisation system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis Advanced Multi-Axis Spine Testing: Clinical Relevance and Research Recommendations.Which radiographic parameters are linked to failure of a dynamic spinal implant?Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion Effect of Device Rigidity and Physiological Loading on Spinal Kinematics after Dynamic Stabilization : An In-Vitro Biomechanical Study The effect of dynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompression.Clinical Experiences of Non-fusion Dynamic Stabilization Surgery for Adjacent Segmental Pathology after Lumbar Fusion The BioFlex System as a Dynamic Stabilization Device : Does It Preserve Lumbar Motion?Role of biomechanics in intervertebral disc degeneration and regenerative therapies: what needs repairing in the disc and what are promising biomaterials for its repair?Pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilizers for degenerative spine: in vitro biomechanical testing and clinical outcomes.Dynamic stabilization: a nidus for infection?The effect of design parameters of interspinous implants on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study.Biomechanical evaluation of pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization devices for the lumbar spine: a systematic review.Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilization systems.Design and biomechanical evaluation of a rodent spinal fixation device.Minimum two-year follow-up of cases with recurrent disc herniation treated with microdiscectomy and posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilisation.A new device used in the restoration of kinematics after total facet arthroplasty.In Vitro Comparison of Dynesys, PEEK, and Titanium Constructs in the Lumbar Spine Biomechanical evaluation of a spherical lumbar interbody device at varying levels of subsidence.Biomechanical study of rod stress after pedicle subtraction osteotomy versus anterior column reconstruction: A finite element study.A standardized representation of spinal quality of motion.Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment.Biomechanical evaluation of posterior lumbar dynamic stabilization: an in vitro comparison between Universal Clamp and Wallis systems Biomechanical evaluation of a posterior non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study.Inter-observer reliability of detecting Dynesys pedicle screw using plain X-rays: a study on 50 post-operative patients.Biomechanical Comparison of Robotically Applied Pure Moment, Ideal Follower Load, and Novel Trunk Weight Loading Protocols on L4-L5 Cadaveric Segments during Flexion-Extension.Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.Stress Reduction in Adjacent Level Discs via Dynamic Instrumentation: A Finite Element Analysis.Response to editorial regarding a novel surgical treatment option in which posterior dynamic stabilization is used to correct coronal plane tilt of a lumbar total disc replacement.

P2860

Q33667919-0FD9B52B-508B-420F-ACAA-D9B1B6526230 Q33972002-4DF17C78-F726-4ECE-8E6F-6A2A61F6B01E Q33973150-EB3665E5-7A21-4590-BD13-18F9DF1C1358 Q33974609-A1C4665C-1ADA-4771-94BD-D6101DCF30FD Q34380810-6997D2B6-B960-49B3-813A-2B44830CAAC3 Q34380818-EFC6800A-DBDA-434A-8C67-FBE44A78B0AD Q34710051-B9A109DB-F493-4FC9-88B1-F25BDC32F208 Q34777163-80605647-4CF1-4805-80EF-2BCBBCAA815C Q34991862-B4C622F3-68E1-42E6-9AEA-29FCEAC64CEC Q35372703-47E86385-6AF7-4F7E-A447-663DAE53A719 Q35514912-55C2E463-34F5-44DF-9DF5-227D9B36D612 Q35926902-2F2393C1-AF84-4A2C-8EDF-96C2208EBB7B Q36013296-4419F375-EEED-4450-8685-05BAE613BA48 Q36040793-2B304C74-C620-4748-B1C3-A0B035FE8AE9 Q36396352-EE5E4FB0-F2F2-462D-B589-9DA45F960C09 Q36843280-8CE6DF7C-E409-4280-B82D-0448BE7BAE53 Q36856362-4BF4A657-0F9F-4D4F-920C-143EEFE0DB3A Q37485410-8DF886B1-47B4-4199-968F-0FFD27DC88F8 Q38078104-50D29E52-AE70-486F-BC26-2F3E68A17A9B Q38175121-4C2E70C0-EFEB-4559-B8B0-32E89769EEE4 Q38199548-829B1570-0A3F-4017-AAD7-4188B04AC85C Q38366290-1D43880D-6649-4C70-9010-A7CCD6298CBF Q38388713-DD79096C-DC03-4E0F-A535-8B3D98464F00 Q39848015-55F32309-7FC7-4C1A-8C58-EEED539F4E6C Q40018703-6F872FB7-8346-460F-BB22-5429B1D99A3D Q40361434-D0599934-BDC2-429C-978C-9A782E3161A7 Q40456678-B8B0F329-5D5E-4E4A-80A7-1F8841B6F516 Q40543110-1E0CFC55-60D5-4A1A-9204-C8CA1EC172E8 Q41172541-4368EFCC-61F7-4130-B132-B50E09EFD890 Q41669161-D41F7745-83D0-4BC5-BBEF-57D625F8FEB4 Q41698293-91D50292-2937-46BB-ABB7-F1F93C153520 Q41975155-57771077-6830-4820-852C-7CA305C41E28 Q41998374-3FFACC8B-526F-43CC-86D7-30569844805C Q41999128-9AE91387-4091-4CDF-B82B-BA84221A5CE5 Q42024175-C75DABB2-287F-4B84-8F08-9BB015C62E92 Q42123247-13BC807C-47B6-4B22-9144-0AD749B37D96 Q42213186-03A6E296-870F-4AD9-B3C8-E3012CC6A3B7 Q42953694-BC05F8DE-FB95-4670-8F0B-AE56D6E0053E Q43193641-D7F1254B-E13E-427F-8953-70A1CC7A1ADE Q43193735-B91A3668-AFC9-424F-80B8-6630F013AC1D

P2860

Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36372647

description

2005 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2005年の論文

@ja

2005年学术文章

@wuu

2005年学术文章

@zh-cn

2005年学术文章

@zh-hans

2005年学术文章

@zh-my

2005年学术文章

@zh-sg

2005年學術文章

@yue

2005年學術文章

@zh

2005年學術文章

@zh-hant

name

Biomechanical characterization ...... ion system: an in vitro study.

@ast

Biomechanical characterization ...... ion system: an in vitro study.

@en

type

label

Biomechanical characterization ...... ion system: an in vitro study.

@ast

Biomechanical characterization ...... ion system: an in vitro study.

@en

prefLabel

Biomechanical characterization ...... ion system: an in vitro study.

@ast

Biomechanical characterization ...... ion system: an in vitro study.

@en

P1433

Q36372647-F6EDB979-62A4-4F20-A03C-F073C47E988C

P1476

Q36372647-935C147A-A32B-4957-8D51-200C9AF6145C

P2093

Q36372647-1CC7163D-ED17-42F0-B21B-A75A552AC7EE

Q36372647-2AE60B6A-1A4C-4E3B-89EE-A30B68F71353

Q36372647-3549033C-B7AF-4050-BBB4-828CF1F917EA

Q36372647-5EC83DA8-51B1-48AF-8AEB-9C9152D06C38

Q36372647-639B14ED-9BBF-40EE-A661-EBA88C3F5155

Q36372647-F573E35F-165F-4C79-AFA4-2EAF25E76E43

P2860

Q36372647-06DFE064-BEFB-4C97-964D-D9DF013AF2CF

Q36372647-0C0C4E12-C552-4C0D-8D6D-60281BF51102

Q36372647-183DD264-63FD-495E-B898-EF8774415E79

Q36372647-2F3A23C4-6E6F-49C4-BF70-B4D6DA668EA0

Q36372647-3AA1DDCF-82CF-47B5-AE26-9522692F0C27

Q36372647-3F16F0F8-3B6D-4E55-8210-9DA49031767D

Q36372647-66E85271-B576-4CD5-B0DC-1518728D59A1

Q36372647-7DE95E41-E0CF-4360-BF26-46A80A59E78D

Q36372647-9991F9A6-4683-4167-9B4F-100F00A7137C

Q36372647-C217D0D2-666E-48C1-9305-C89CACF3ECF5

P2888

Q36372647-4142ECA9-11BA-4D74-9897-046A521D70C1

P304

Q36372647-2AB12CB5-8469-4B8D-B7D2-8CB26702A492

P31

Q36372647-934808BA-E211-4816-86D8-95188B6E8A34

P356

Q36372647-2A45BC7E-5A81-4C20-AA9E-1B804D60E134

P433

Q36372647-2E9C0394-BB5D-4A21-A452-8208D2EFC069

P478

Q36372647-CC240570-7E11-4E6F-A8A2-C97F98EEE55D

P577

Q36372647-27B73DF3-2E78-4CE4-B03A-58DE715A328A

P5875

Q36372647-4BABABC2-6D20-4BFE-851A-86835D9DCBCA

P698

Q36372647-600AD080-F2EA-4374-BAC5-D8D4B71A51DB

P921

Q36372647-E0EE1692-5D6C-4A98-B3B6-959C38900376

P932

Q36372647-A5495986-57F7-42DB-AA9E-9F1F03DF41C1

P356

S00586-005-0948-9

P1433

European Spine Journal

P1476

Biomechanical characterization ...... ion system: an in vitro study.

@en

P2093

Christina A Niosi

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

David R Wilson

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Derek C Wilson

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ory Keynan

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Qingan A Zhu

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Thomas R Oxland

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group

Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies.

Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain.

The dynamic neutralization system for the spine: a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system.

Community studies of the health service implications of low back pain.

The external spinal fixator does not reduce anterior column motion under axial compressive loads. A mechanical in vitro study.

Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion.

Neutral zone and range of motion in the spine are greater with stepwise loading than with a continuous loading protocol. An in vitro porcine investigation.

Influence of a follower load on intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine.

Measurement of the total motion between two body segments. I. Analytical development.

P2888

s00586-005-0948-9

P304

913-922

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S00586-005-0948-9

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

6

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

15

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2005-10-11T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

7547736

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

16217663

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

P932

3489456

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string