Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.
about
A review of the psychometric performance of the EQ-5D in people with urinary incontinenceUnassisted pelvic floor exercises for postnatal women: a systematic review.Diagnostic performance of chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging for colonic neoplasms: a meta-analysis.The questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis (QUID): validity and responsiveness to change in women undergoing non-surgical therapies for treatment of stress predominant urinary incontinence.Urodynamic assessment of urinary incontinence.The diagnostic accuracy of serologic and molecular methods for detecting visceral leishmaniasis in HIV infected patients: meta-analysisPotential diagnostic value of serum p53 antibody for detecting esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.Identifying continence options after stroke (ICONS): a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial.INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invaA Valsalva leak-point pressure of >100 cmH2O is associated with greater success in AdVance™ sling placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence.The value of preoperative urodynamics according to gynecologists and urologists with special interest in stress urinary incontinence.A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: the INVESTIGATE-I studyTesting and Treating Women after Unsuccessful Conservative Treatments for Overactive Bladder or Mixed Urinary Incontinence: A Model-Based Economic Evaluation Based on the BUS Study.Assessing professional equipoise and views about a future clinical trial of invasive urodynamics prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: a survey within a mixed methods feasibility studySystematic review and meta-analysis of methods of diagnostic assessment for urinary incontinence.The evidence for urodynamic investigation of patients with symptoms of urinary incontinence.Comparison of autofluorescence imaging bronchoscopy and white light bronchoscopy for detection of lung cancers and precancerous lesions.Improving continence services for older people from the service-providers' perspective: a qualitative interview study.Distress and quality of life characteristics associated with seeking surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence.Role of urodynamics in stress urinary incontinence: A critical appraisal.Diagnostic test systematic reviews: bibliographic search filters ("Clinical Queries") for diagnostic accuracy studies perform well.Comparison of Perineal Sonographically Measured and Functional Urodynamic Urethral Length in Female Urinary Incontinence.Trial participation as avoidance strategy: a qualitative study.Screening injured children for physical abuse or neglect in emergency departments: a systematic review.Systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound as the method of measuring bladder wall thickness in the diagnosis of detrusor overactivity.The correlation between clinical and urodynamic diagnosis in classifying the type of urinary incontinence in women. A systematic review of the literature.Constructing trials to show whether urodynamic studies are necessary in lower urinary tract dysfunction.An evaluative review of questionnaires recommended for the assessment of quality of life and symptom severity in women with urinary incontinence.De novo stress urinary incontinence after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women without occult incontinence.Pain and embarrassment associated with urodynamic testing in women.Time efficiency of a web-based questionnaire in urogynecology: a randomized study.An exploration of the effects of introducing a telemonitoring system for continence assessment in a nursing home.Lower bowel function in urinary incontinent women, urinary continent women and in controls.Exploring associations between lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and gastrointestinal (GI) problems in women: a study in women with urological and GI problems vs a control population.The 3-day bladder diary is a feasible, reliable and valid tool to evaluate the lower urinary tract symptoms in women.Does urodynamic verification of overactive bladder determine treatment success? Results from a randomized placebo-controlled study.Joined-up thinking: enthusing frontline clinicians.The predictive value of ePAQ in the urodynamic diagnoses-A prospective cohort study.Feasibility of fluid volume conductance to assess bladder volume.Reliability and validity of urinary nerve growth factor measurement in women with lower urinary tract symptoms.
P2860
Q27006734-D1AE476C-C8B1-44FB-8DC3-66D363FC647BQ33285404-C76CDB36-D0F3-4292-AB0C-C0C5EBB37C3FQ33721321-E153E77C-3045-4E90-8CB4-3537F626C73FQ33937470-CFCDF559-B3FE-4FB5-AA5A-EA32DA2CAE35Q34124007-8594F6C0-22AD-42C9-8B9D-F9E26166C8B8Q34293034-835FB244-7CF2-4AAD-A6A9-DB7035CFCA86Q34534832-1CCAE996-1B87-4671-8B01-B5D030F2EA03Q35016348-F0F6D255-DAE4-4C0F-9FC3-6B7E37AB15F8Q35153872-21EDB7AB-AECD-4A25-8352-1F59773409C7Q35162913-7C166916-26E6-4261-ADF7-08B0FE821B21Q35834801-77E5AB5B-E784-4106-80F5-C3A8D975E7A4Q36041073-F9E2D14D-8EAB-4677-934A-E284828EB2F8Q36101488-93FC2EFC-E2C2-48D6-ACAD-A79ECAC6D89BQ36419277-DD48051C-A86F-4F64-BA64-793202390537Q36611132-00CA7BDE-AC75-4E6D-9CB1-310CFE3600EDQ36664028-E4BF2C75-8032-49CC-A17C-368E379D171BQ37014646-0AAFA409-412E-4763-8F7E-15B305FEC424Q37065091-1E904A95-3533-4632-A10C-C9A7BCB80AF7Q37103821-451C5400-1C7C-48E7-B778-C3F25CCD3F16Q37311906-CC796D43-FC54-4D83-A871-3393581DCC4DQ37332791-0F7F8D94-9BFE-4D7E-8D2A-4FDCC1AB3021Q37368848-7B2D9099-F2A1-441F-9819-B8A65AC18F37Q37476500-AF4B1DB5-0D9E-4376-9978-8333F254DCADQ37667138-22A549FD-91AE-4EC5-A9A0-F7E08A3851ACQ37737974-112372C8-3F04-4596-A8E8-81C612992E6EQ37836653-D4062C75-9F18-419C-A640-0AD1FF685760Q37887658-76A7E739-8DB0-4A70-AA3C-4EAE7C480B87Q38174171-0D3E4ADF-ABA9-46AE-8433-ABDF0352F832Q38966363-3A7F2E89-228E-4B6B-923E-8461583006B2Q39306628-EDD40B45-399C-4B56-B30A-D99077C0929EQ40229372-17FCFE36-1793-4FC7-8A56-C80F0E845F19Q43312169-5E313C0F-0AF2-4E11-8FDB-40A67B609E49Q43318959-53FC23D6-8186-427C-B0CD-A8AF6190333FQ43878345-EB498686-3125-4A06-BA15-BA83A48FFB54Q45162864-3DFF6CBD-70C3-455B-9804-8821BA439B69Q46090892-CCD786A3-E89B-4573-AA37-80B08155C970Q46529248-04DF97ED-00F6-402D-AE8A-59E23B6EC700Q47394938-EBCD0918-837D-48EB-BF7C-D18950AED77CQ48009391-3D733CED-6259-4929-A69E-DF2833F8EC23Q50574977-26E7113F-16CC-418F-9131-E18961616DB3
P2860
Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年学术文章
@wuu
2006年学术文章
@zh-cn
2006年学术文章
@zh-hans
2006年学术文章
@zh-my
2006年学术文章
@zh-sg
2006年學術文章
@yue
2006年學術文章
@zh
2006年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.
@ast
Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.
@en
type
label
Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.
@ast
Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.
@en
prefLabel
Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.
@ast
Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.
@en
P2093
P356
P1476
Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence
@en
P2093
A J Sutton
J L Martin
K R Abrams
K S Williams
R P Assassa
P304
1-132, iii-iv
P356
10.3310/HTA10060
P577
2006-02-01T00:00:00Z