E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys
about
The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner's survey response rates - a systematic reviewCombining web-based and mail surveys improves response rates: a PBRN study from PRIME Net.Prescribing habits and caregiver satisfaction with resources for dosing children: rationale for more informative dosing guidanceIncreasing response rates from physicians in oncology research: a structured literature review and data from a recent physician surveyThe practice of therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest in France: a national survey.Uterine fibroid embolisation for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a survey of clinical practice in Europe.Advantages and disadvantages of educational email alerts for family physicians: viewpoint.How to assess a survey in surgery.Detoxification in naturopathic medicine: a survey.Patient responses to research recruitment and follow-up surveys: findings from a diverse multicultural health care setting in QatarAllowing Physicians to Choose the Value of Compensation for Participation in a Web-Based Survey: Randomized Controlled TrialIncentive and Reminder Strategies to Improve Response Rate for Internet-Based Physician Surveys: A Randomized Experiment.Combining Internet-Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial.Contraceptive counseling among pediatric primary care providers in Western Pennsylvania: A survey-based studyPaediatrician office follow-up of common minor fractures.Response audit of an Internet survey of health care providers and administrators: implications for determination of response rates.
P2860
Q27026398-BF980FED-B527-4F6C-86FB-23C1AF3A8F9FQ33443696-123926BD-FE1D-43F4-8662-9D09E3F8543BQ33860506-923B2B96-D85C-4835-A26B-201817F75697Q34177859-0196C387-274A-465E-A3BB-6227E5517274Q34438052-BFCA576F-0670-4002-B543-14B9E78F67B9Q35093959-EC8D4F07-2C4D-4D48-A0B1-3E23F5B25BC2Q35223107-8A1E5177-55F5-4BC5-80F9-356A1B203350Q35614875-78D35582-4CBB-45AD-9CD8-81D6E29331D0Q35617512-232D6DF6-8A24-4BF9-9658-2F9E5C8B8AC8Q35905263-4538E3E7-AC8C-4E14-B46C-D040CEFF3123Q36442273-D1C8CB4A-705A-4500-AD1B-E94EA2875C1AQ37302112-695260D2-0667-4048-9254-4D957FBED23EQ38952164-4E2C36F0-D1C3-48D8-910B-E5C35F7DA33EQ41664400-5AB543F9-78B5-4E8B-B961-E4B77477C533Q41869667-93BFCC59-5D2E-4FE3-B8C6-3D16CA3559D3Q43195694-71948870-CC9B-40F2-99D6-3B8065EA47BB
P2860
E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年学术文章
@wuu
2004年学术文章
@zh-cn
2004年学术文章
@zh-hans
2004年学术文章
@zh-my
2004年学术文章
@zh-sg
2004年學術文章
@yue
2004年學術文章
@zh
2004年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys
@ast
E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys
@en
type
label
E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys
@ast
E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys
@en
prefLabel
E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys
@ast
E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys
@en
P2093
P1476
E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys
@en
P2093
Marnie McCall
Marshall Godwin
Rachelle Seguin
Susan MacDonald
P304
P407
P577
2004-03-01T00:00:00Z