High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-Stop) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis.
about
Controversies about interspinous process devices in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases: past, present, and futureA Systematic Review of Interspinous Dynamic StabilizationInterspinous posterior devices: What is the real surgical indication?Grade 1 spondylolisthesis and interspinous device placement: removal in six patients and analysis of current dataThe Felix-trial. Double-blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication.Interspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last generation? A reviewThe short- and mid-term effect of dynamic interspinous distraction in the treatment of recurrent lumbar facet joint painStabilising effect of dynamic interspinous spacers in degenerative low-grade lumbar instability.Interspinous spacers in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disease: our experience with DIAM and Aperius devicesSafety and efficacy of a new percutaneously implantable interspinous process deviceMinimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacerMinimally invasive treatment of moderate lumbar spinal stenosis with the superion interspinous spacer.A review of interspinous fusion devices: High complication, reoperation rates, and costs with poor outcomes.Interspinous spacers versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.Interspinous process devices for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Facet-sparing lumbar decompression with a minimally invasive flexible MicroBlade Shaver® versus traditional decompression: quantitative radiographic assessment.Kinematic characteristics of lumbar spinous processes during axial rotation in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease lateral lumbar interbody fusion and intervention.Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion.A short history of posterior dynamic stabilizationInterspinous spacers for lumbar foraminal stenosis: formal trials are justified.Evaluations of computed tomography images and lumbar specimens in mimic operations of transverse rotation laminoplasty for lumbar spinal stenosis.Motion characteristics of the lumbar spinous processes with degenerative disc disease and degenerative spondylolisthesisMinimum 2-year follow-up result of degenerative spinal stenosis treated with interspinous u (coflex).Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial.Effectiveness of interspinous implant surgery in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Interspinous distractor devices for the management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a miracle cure for a common problem?Minimally invasive procedures on the lumbar spine.Aperius interspinous device for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.Market approval processes for new types of spinal devices: challenges and recommendations for improvement.Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motionElastic resistance of the spine: Why does motion preservation surgery almost fail?A novel strategy of non-fusion instrumentation with coflex interlaminar stabilization after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.Response to: Comment on "Controversies about Interspinous Process Devices in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases: Past, Present, and Future".The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: A survey of the “surgical and research” articles in the European Spine Journal, 2008.The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the “medical” articles in the European Spine Journal, 2008.Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer vs Decompression in Patients with Neurogenic Claudication: An Alternative in Selected Patients?Let’X-STOP with any “distraction” from the true problem: scenarios in which minimally invasive surgery is not welcome!
P2860
Q21284518-C85E26C5-CEBA-4EAD-AA35-A9B1206118CAQ26786721-04D95EC7-B082-4BF4-90E1-6B51503AA1B0Q30430735-2D2FAEDF-C589-4C0B-9D02-5C225B98BDE5Q30934874-6D4FC025-8CBE-4F2D-AD96-26D5DE3D4E88Q33589314-BD98D048-04DB-411F-8D6A-6C42C244435BQ33700209-7D6CFAF1-A9A2-4F7C-87CE-218F38D20E55Q33972069-EEBA1D8E-B186-46D6-8956-AE968E90DEA8Q34619126-50D0F0EE-5E93-4A58-892E-8027FA88B872Q34918584-58ED6B4A-1FA3-4D80-AB82-2F9A7A5D86AEQ35083975-2A7EA0B5-335F-4E2F-A0C3-B51573399A58Q35233368-277D357F-7672-4035-BD51-3D3F35C023AFQ35444249-395D3E1A-F50C-4E26-A15B-0D5C3A9D198BQ35758465-3167F10D-5207-43FD-B8DD-811C629F6195Q35933301-93CB5863-B73A-4D06-9778-6FC0EF97E47BQ36017644-0062D5DB-AF4E-4685-89F5-7F385B163367Q36144976-27D1F9B7-5169-4C58-B624-A36B34DE97ECQ36334720-1385D174-35D7-4CD4-A415-2DABA0463DB2Q36402848-C106BE39-27CF-426D-836F-F3AFDC86B8E4Q36522725-16E4942F-03EF-431F-ABC3-8730F55C6CECQ36627273-9603C95E-FBFA-47E4-93FA-C3E34355397FQ36816302-9AC4BBA1-EA0F-400B-9541-347430608F82Q37350561-38AE9435-8A05-4C9A-8DF3-FF18B5A444BCQ37412060-FE99B32E-4E12-4FFE-820A-61088E6BD06EQ37503616-70CBAA4B-3AF5-48C2-B48D-49255701B4D9Q37888533-E0AFE3AC-C52A-4570-918B-546E5F852070Q38009836-2B404E42-97DE-4636-9709-120803A19501Q38328052-4903757B-8BD1-4630-B76F-2D342FF05607Q38577790-106E8D70-3882-44BA-8D43-35442E4C57A7Q38861363-04203DD0-F5D7-40B4-838C-FD4FC7C289A6Q39689110-2A14C37D-5678-4E79-A7DA-6993BD59DA9BQ42042392-E818C2B7-526D-495B-AA8B-4B4D0F9A0B01Q42390318-830F2F44-A889-4FC5-85B8-F14F8C72B4FCQ42717946-31542BE7-2D7D-47E4-9A6E-B3029F063FA0Q45957962-AB2EFB6F-C274-4CF8-AE20-9D4666F68994Q45958090-CC6CD88E-7A24-4171-9335-BA9BFBD5E736Q47605887-06C27693-BB51-4AAD-BBD2-FA32A0340AD3Q54986711-3376B281-DCAC-4311-A636-EEA42FC18A9E
P2860
High failure rate of the interspinous distraction device (X-Stop) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by degenerative spondylolisthesis.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年学术文章
@wuu
2007年学术文章
@zh-cn
2007年学术文章
@zh-hans
2007年学术文章
@zh-my
2007年学术文章
@zh-sg
2007年學術文章
@yue
2007年學術文章
@zh
2007年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
High failure rate of the inter ...... egenerative spondylolisthesis.
@ast
High failure rate of the inter ...... egenerative spondylolisthesis.
@en
type
label
High failure rate of the inter ...... egenerative spondylolisthesis.
@ast
High failure rate of the inter ...... egenerative spondylolisthesis.
@en
prefLabel
High failure rate of the inter ...... egenerative spondylolisthesis.
@ast
High failure rate of the inter ...... egenerative spondylolisthesis.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
High failure rate of the inter ...... egenerative spondylolisthesis.
@en
P2093
Barend J van Royen
Frits H Wapstra
Johannes L Bron
Olaf J Verhoof
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00586-007-0492-X
P577
2007-09-11T00:00:00Z