BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
about
Reliability and validity of needle biopsy evaluation of breast-abnormalities using the B-categorization--design and objectives of the Diagnosis Optimisation Study (DIOS).Validation of the fifth edition BI-RADS ultrasound lexicon with comparison of fourth and fifth edition diagnostic performance using video clips.Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions: a meta-analysisNonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonographyQuantitative ultrasound analysis for classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast masses.Interobserver agreement on the interpretation of automated whole breast ultrasonography.Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement of Sonographic BIRADS Lexicon in the Assessment of Breast Masses.A comparison of logistic regression analysis and an artificial neural network using the BI-RADS lexicon for ultrasonography in conjunction with introbserver variability.Band-like interposing fat along large vessels: ultrasonographic pseudolesions of the breastTriple receptor-negative breast cancer: imaging and clinical characteristics.Quantification of the UK 5-point breast imaging classification and mapping to BI-RADS to facilitate comparison with international literature.Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible.Breast Sonography - 2D, 3D, 4D Ultrasound or Elastography?Interobserver concordance in the BI-RADS classification of breast ultrasound examsComputer-aided classification of breast masses: performance and interobserver variability of expert radiologists versus residents.How to improve your breast cancer program: Standardized reporting using the new American College of Radiology Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System.Observer agreement using the ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-ultrasound, First Edition (2003)Sensitivity of imaging for multifocal-multicentric breast carcinoma.Histological analysis of benign breast imaging reporting and data system categories 4c and 5 breast lesions in imaging study.Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) in the diagnostic value of thyroid nodules: a systematic review.Meta-analysis of thyroid imaging reporting and data system in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of 10,437 thyroid nodules.Adjunctive targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the work-up of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 and 4 lesions.Variability in Observer Performance Between Faculty Members and Residents Using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-Ultrasound, Fifth Edition (2013).Effect of contact force on breast tissue optical property measurements using a broadband diffuse optical spectroscopy handheld probe.Predictors of interobserver agreement in breast imaging using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data SystemIndividualized computer-aided education in mammography based on user modeling: concept and preliminary experimentsChallenges to developing proteomic-based breast cancer diagnostics.Inter- and intraobserver reliability and validation of a new method for determination of eosinophil counts in patients with esophageal eosinophiliaCategory assessment based on 3D volume data acquired by automated breast ultrasonography.The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme: its role as an assessment and stratification tool.Characterization of thyroid nodules using the proposed thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS).Observer Variability of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Lexicon for Mammography.The mammographic density of a mass is a significant predictor of breast cancer.Concordant or discordant? Imaging-pathology correlation in a sonography-guided core needle biopsy of a breast lesion.Comparing the performance of image enhancement methods to detect microcalcification clusters in digital mammographyThe ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.The use of the Gail model, body mass index and SNPs to predict breast cancer among women with abnormal (BI-RADS 4) mammogramsComparison between fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB) in the diagnosis of breast lesions.Radiologist characteristics associated with interpretive performance of diagnostic mammography
P2860
Q30319809-36305AC9-FBA2-4069-B2CE-92CE9E72EC4BQ30372444-254B95F4-099E-4457-90DE-CFAF346F4217Q30408134-F990DEFC-D34C-4CF6-B9E2-DE25E594838CQ30408211-1CAF518B-CA66-4598-9338-947A2407B4F9Q30417288-1EE4B928-B21C-4BA8-92F5-29F7472D4CCFQ30424166-37642877-C49C-4701-965C-A1ECC266DAC8Q30428284-00F42D30-B34C-4DE1-A632-7E1192F45683Q30445902-A318F6E7-D11B-4B03-8B15-34D8E76326CBQ30448706-5E23B183-AC42-4CCA-B355-FC7831C95A01Q30449283-2DDD86DF-BBAC-480F-AA05-AD15A51DB27AQ30455153-DEBF6EBB-A2F6-49DD-B0D6-A2C8FFADC3FAQ30461429-26AF7549-05FF-431E-BC60-CFA4FC4EEF57Q30468391-3EF43B53-FABD-4BEE-B418-4E98E627E7D6Q30468734-B1DBE319-6564-4B53-AD31-6C4ED10A374AQ30470591-43C20CA2-03B1-4FD9-B7EE-7F4DC8BD49E6Q30471855-339D37FE-B574-42D4-97DC-2B179FB5B3D7Q30484485-8BA58327-32BC-4061-8DE7-00244E07D3CDQ30491241-59DD5220-C7F0-4A98-B767-2B184B358FE1Q30492873-F371B15B-9604-4BF2-8A7D-F8484D4E45A1Q30573766-B263AB84-3DD7-4B70-99E3-6AFA13F569C3Q30798487-B293E6CA-417C-4DE1-AF62-8A4B7115ED8AQ30854440-C26137AA-F602-4046-AAFE-D0EE407F5875Q31094573-38238163-CE18-4339-AAA0-DE58D10EF2BBQ31142721-4BEE6FA7-E78E-44BF-B3B2-C50721C41B13Q33485199-37B8755A-C8CE-4EAC-A636-D8E636005D14Q33543213-F6A61F4B-64B9-481C-BF81-B161DE115CAFQ33724300-4C1164BB-696C-4E6F-82AD-9DBFCD453A70Q33823926-839469B2-53FE-4C3B-9375-1C136CA5B13AQ33956853-71C8DD40-E7A7-48A3-8DC8-24D01EB6AD4AQ34105016-E5D9403A-F3C4-44E2-B2B3-3B8E87A805D5Q34194755-D85EB2A2-2B6B-421A-AF54-1DDE29FE458CQ34238178-D4546F6C-9376-4B9C-B954-B665CD9025F1Q34278769-6F38A5BD-A266-4A21-B3A6-5CE05737FA41Q34534802-2F682F80-873D-4D96-9F24-36A9D5718A4FQ34642064-D339EDA2-BA54-45B1-BC6C-8E06C0D09BE3Q34987077-405912C7-52E0-4064-81BC-EBD8FC4B72F9Q34996582-D71858B1-A176-4EF2-A9DC-948BE033EEECQ35030287-D1227110-0C99-469A-87B8-0CF0D326E3E6Q35063361-B50ABFB2-70C4-41A0-AD7C-964E42E4C682Q35131036-13D7A0A0-48CB-4163-B9F7-C6AFC859A058
P2860
BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年学术文章
@wuu
2006年学术文章
@zh-cn
2006年学术文章
@zh-hans
2006年学术文章
@zh-my
2006年学术文章
@zh-sg
2006年學術文章
@yue
2006年學術文章
@zh
2006年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
BI-RADS lexicon for US and mam ...... and positive predictive value.
@ast
BI-RADS lexicon for US and mam ...... and positive predictive value.
@en
type
label
BI-RADS lexicon for US and mam ...... and positive predictive value.
@ast
BI-RADS lexicon for US and mam ...... and positive predictive value.
@en
prefLabel
BI-RADS lexicon for US and mam ...... and positive predictive value.
@ast
BI-RADS lexicon for US and mam ...... and positive predictive value.
@en
P2093
P1433
P1476
BI-RADS lexicon for US and mam ...... and positive predictive value.
@en
P2093
Barbara Schepps
Elizabeth Lazarus
Linda S Livingston
Martha B Mainiero
Susan L Koelliker
P304
P356
10.1148/RADIOL.2392042127
P407
P577
2006-03-28T00:00:00Z