A meta-analysis demonstrates no significant differences between patient and population preferences.
about
Determinants of time trade-off valuations for EQ-5D-5L health states: data from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study.Patient versus general population health state valuations: a case study of non-specific low back painDiscrepancy in rating health-related quality of life of depression between patient and general populationComparison of general population, patient, and carer utility values for dementia health statesDo chronic disease patients value generic health states differently from individuals with no chronic disease? A case of a multicultural Asian population.Are patients' judgments of health status really different from the general population?Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvementReview of disability weight studies: comparison of methodological choices and valuesDo individuals with and without depression value depression differently? And if so, why?Cross-cultural variation in preference for replantation or revision amputation: Societal and surgeon views.Focusing illusion, adaptation and EQ-5D health state descriptions: the difference between patients and public.How bad is depression? Preference score estimates from depressed patients and the general population.Using surveys to calculate disability-adjusted life-year.A comparison of injured patient and general population valuations of EQ-5D health states for New Zealand.The use of research evidence on patient preferences in health care decision-making: issues, controversies and moving forward.Does diabetes have an impact on health-state utility? a study of Asians in Singapore.Comparison of health state values derived from patients and individuals from the general population.Relative importance of the EQ-5D five dimensions among patients with chronic diseases in South Korea - a comparison with the general population preference weights
P2860
Q31031757-08019BE8-D1F8-4B2D-BA74-8D1B64147994Q33645304-D68B5EC9-EB2E-4513-A930-FF29F889FF99Q34600559-C9AF1D39-C46F-4B15-BCE9-5BA839FB045CQ34735838-DE71B9C0-3B7A-49C0-9B37-4ECAC92E6C97Q35030029-6F75027B-A0CA-4DC4-AB5A-D5E408C72DCFQ35042053-8E9AEE94-2018-4269-BDBC-AF245AED0556Q35219993-DCE44B4C-3DB7-42A0-9572-B7A896C6B3F1Q35653593-27506EA6-2132-42FA-8C8D-C26C922FCCBAQ36118879-E68820B9-0AA6-4A4C-BB10-EAFEE3B113FFQ36813797-3564304A-E9B9-4691-9663-DE37A136D598Q37332853-5FC0A2B1-150E-4945-BE84-8A31B2A29178Q37335748-7DE5B0C8-DCA6-44CA-8C73-C9245783E9D8Q37537391-65004770-88E5-4FBA-9582-6DDE12673BADQ37594637-E6686CC9-AD59-4BFC-92BF-30B7DEC339BCQ38241075-1F7FFB71-BC4A-42CC-9496-E55731B9BD26Q45733598-4D8A69E4-6652-4A6F-A01B-D5FEAD713AA3Q48238595-51CE8688-4428-4F25-88DC-AD56AFE2353FQ57210964-73790258-5D51-431E-9E2F-A9502F3B73ED
P2860
A meta-analysis demonstrates no significant differences between patient and population preferences.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年論文
@yue
2006年論文
@zh-hant
2006年論文
@zh-hk
2006年論文
@zh-mo
2006年論文
@zh-tw
2006年论文
@wuu
2006年论文
@zh
2006年论文
@zh-cn
name
A meta-analysis demonstrates n ...... nt and population preferences.
@ast
A meta-analysis demonstrates n ...... nt and population preferences.
@en
type
label
A meta-analysis demonstrates n ...... nt and population preferences.
@ast
A meta-analysis demonstrates n ...... nt and population preferences.
@en
prefLabel
A meta-analysis demonstrates n ...... nt and population preferences.
@ast
A meta-analysis demonstrates n ...... nt and population preferences.
@en
P2093
P31
P1476
A meta-analysis demonstrates n ...... nt and population preferences.
@en
P2093
André Ament
Maria G T Dolders
Maurice P A Zeegers
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2005.07.020
P577
2006-07-01T00:00:00Z