A systematic review of factors affecting the judgments produced by formal consensus development methods in health care.
about
Conflicts of interest among authors of clinical practice guidelines for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitusCanadian National Guidelines and Recommendations for Integrating Career Advising Into Medical School Curricula.Use of a formal consensus development technique to produce recommendations for improving the effectiveness of adult mental health multidisciplinary team meetingsDeveloping a pressure ulcer risk factor minimum data set and risk assessment framework.Conflicts of interest and clinical recommendations: comparison of two concurrent clinical practice guidelines for primary immune thrombocytopenia developed by different methods.Reaching beyond the review of research evidence: a qualitative study of decision making during the development of clinical practice guidelines for disease prevention in healthcare.Framework and indicator testing protocol for developing and piloting quality indicators for the UK quality and outcomes frameworkDevelopment of paediatric quality of inpatient care indicators for low-income countries - A Delphi study.A new pressure ulcer conceptual framework.The professional perspective on patient involvement in the development of quality indicators: a qualitative analysis using the example of chronic heart failure in the German health care settingUsing a collaborative research approach to develop an interdisciplinary research agenda for the study of mobile health interventions for older adults.Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 5. Group processes.What is the Best Way to Produce Consensus and Buy in to Guidelines for Rectal Cancer?A Latin American, Portuguese and Spanish consensus on a core communication curriculum for undergraduate medical educationAssessment of a novel hybrid Delphi and Nominal Groups technique to evaluate quality indicatorsDeveloping clinical practice guidelines: target audiences, identifying topics for guidelines, guideline group composition and functioning and conflicts of interest.An experimental study of the influence of individual participant characteristics on formal consensus development.Critical Appraisal of Microbiology Guidelines Endorsed by two Professional Organisations: Société Française De Microbiologie (SFM) and American Society of Microbiology (ASM).The process of developing evidence-based guidance in medicine and public health: a qualitative study of views from the inside.Inter-professional clinical practice guideline for vocational evaluation following traumatic brain injury: a systematic and evidence-based approach.Bridging evidence and consensus methodology for inherited metabolic disorders: creating nutrition guidelines.Quality nursing care in Australian paediatric hospitals: a Delphi approach to identifying indicators.Relevance to family practice of English-language guidelines on breast, colorectal and prostate cancer: a review.Developing clinical practice guidelines for epilepsy: A report from the ILAE Epilepsy Guidelines Working Group.Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in focal therapy for prostate cancer: a Delphi consensus project.Formal consensus to identify clinically important changes in management resulting from the use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients who activate the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) pathway.Simultaneous development of guidelines and quality indicators -- how do guideline groups act? A worldwide survey.Outcome indicators in palliative care--how to assess quality and success. Focus group and nominal group technique in Germany.The price of false beliefs: unrealistic expectations as a contributor to the health care crisis.Wrong guidelines: why and how often they occur.Towards high-quality, useful practice guidelines for child and youth mental health disorders: protocol for a systematic review and consensus exercise.Breastfeeding information in midwifery textbooks in Japan: content analysis with evaluation standards based on Delphi method.The Delphi technique in ecology and biological conservation: applications and guidelinesA Transparent Process for “Evidence-Informed” Policy MakingKey impacts of climate engineering on biodiversity and ecosystems, with priorities for future researchUsing consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education researchWhen I say … consensus group methods
P2860
Q28534390-08D9505F-E8B0-4117-BE74-D93703B91628Q30491505-7F12396D-F8CE-474D-8045-5683A4591B82Q30656326-C4868C75-F2E9-4066-B7B6-89427DA350EBQ30824851-3B1C65DB-2E9F-4BD8-9826-485DD63F8CFFQ33406792-FC4A15E2-3F71-4D67-9E97-A91B6B1AC5F0Q33660362-AE852D95-4EA1-423D-A95F-DC454EE8A375Q33989541-6CBE8EB7-266C-433B-9365-D574797CD3F6Q34499665-A9344846-7CC9-4824-9CCD-ED1CF1EABE21Q34677498-5F807D9E-8A9F-4422-B33D-DF1F60436D5CQ35024265-4E57D144-9676-4DC5-9B72-85C1E675314CQ35160036-4458109F-193C-4825-BBC1-66099BAB4546Q35225618-3D9F05CC-BAFB-4412-9743-813C2CA8D6ABQ35931518-962F04AF-F304-4C97-AA49-B0B2A64B3C61Q35971074-507FE68E-F84B-40F7-A8F7-F83494CE2341Q36085534-25107622-1AC8-4284-B19D-E172A907D3A0Q36468650-95D36522-9379-4573-9D55-96D76CD829A7Q36711674-2F64DD35-73A5-4D6C-B47E-751C580F8435Q37155189-7C9B07BE-EFBF-4D45-87D9-85C338205D29Q37355806-C126DFA3-E106-4265-92BD-E016C526156DQ37942015-86843F01-F56D-4A35-AEAA-9343C53A07C1Q37968348-7A07D85E-7692-4304-B3C5-B6B8716BCF55Q37993597-E8BEB8D6-6343-4AEC-A386-57EE982D80D6Q38542714-07B86BF6-EFBE-4451-A250-66695B5C8A00Q38619672-439FD116-2495-4FFF-8A63-419287FD7EEAQ39322813-B44F5ABF-6983-40BB-9520-263D27662FBEQ39395271-8A0AB78A-9A3E-4C7D-8217-C1577D7504F1Q39493940-0648962D-A70E-47B9-B798-6A50B703C55AQ42151898-DE12D39F-B743-4F8A-9BCA-3B576860240CQ42344687-19BA2681-50CE-43EB-9228-A9E33D76264FQ47593574-CCBFB944-F85A-4B55-B0AA-ADD0BFA43B74Q50043993-E147060D-03A2-43F3-826F-8A247F0D60EAQ53145881-CAADE351-7432-4EE6-9DF5-00E3384B816BQ56417757-5324A19F-192C-4621-AABB-F0BFA5009147Q56417760-489AE310-B9DD-4242-A5A9-083B89AE4677Q57012867-2CA467E3-33AD-4FD2-8455-C11D1563DB11Q57391888-F1BC82E0-456B-4D1A-A90D-6E43A6673A28Q57391891-9E6EED86-3274-4930-850A-0F7D29D4C4EB
P2860
A systematic review of factors affecting the judgments produced by formal consensus development methods in health care.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年論文
@yue
2006年論文
@zh-hant
2006年論文
@zh-hk
2006年論文
@zh-mo
2006年論文
@zh-tw
2006年论文
@wuu
2006年论文
@zh
2006年论文
@zh-cn
name
A systematic review of factors ...... opment methods in health care.
@ast
A systematic review of factors ...... opment methods in health care.
@en
type
label
A systematic review of factors ...... opment methods in health care.
@ast
A systematic review of factors ...... opment methods in health care.
@en
prefLabel
A systematic review of factors ...... opment methods in health care.
@ast
A systematic review of factors ...... opment methods in health care.
@en
P1476
A systematic review of factors ...... opment methods in health care.
@en
P2093
Andrew Hutchings
Rosalind Raine
P304
P356
10.1258/135581906777641659
P577
2006-07-01T00:00:00Z