Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review.
about
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaborationThe Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studiesEnhancing access to reports of randomized trials published world-wide--the contribution of EMBASE records to the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane LibraryEpidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviewsDeveloping risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of methodology and reportingGuidelines for reporting health research: the EQUATOR network's survey of guideline authorsOn the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experimentsTransparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR NetworkA call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical researchSystematic survey of the design, statistical analysis, and reporting of studies published in the 2008 volume of the Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and MetabolismStrengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration.Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaborationAssociation of industry funding with the outcome and quality of randomized controlled trials of drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritisImproving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statementQuality assessment of reporting of randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding in traditional Chinese medicine RCTs: a review of 3159 RCTs identified from 260 systematic reviewsCONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsThe quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMedCONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsMIFlowCyt: the minimum information about a Flow Cytometry ExperimentAnalysis and reporting of stepped wedge randomised controlled trials: synthesis and critical appraisal of published studies, 2010 to 2014How to Develop an Electronic Clinical Endometriosis Research File Integrated in Clinical PracticeSteps in the undertaking of a systematic review in orthopaedic surgeryPersonalized medicine using DNA biomarkers: a reviewLower tidal volume at initiation of mechanical ventilation may reduce progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic reviewQuality of reporting of clinical non-inferiority and equivalence randomised trials--update and extension.The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaborationSystematic review finds major deficiencies in sample size methodology and reporting for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trialsThe REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statementWelcoming systematic reviews to the Journal of the Medical Library AssociationAre peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journalsGuidelines for information about therapy experiments: a proposal on best practice for recording experimental data on cancer therapyImproving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal researchProtocol-developing meta-ethnography reporting guidelines (eMERGe)Do emergency medicine journals promote trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines? A survey of "Instructions for Authors"Are pediatric Open Access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions.Professional medical writing support and the quality of randomised controlled trial reporting: a cross-sectional study.A systematic review of the quality of reporting in published smoking cessation trials for pregnant women: an explanation for the evidence-practice gap?Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension.The value of health care--a matter of discussion in Germany.Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement
P2860
Q21092360-45FDDC8C-7702-472C-9A16-A12E9042595EQ21092368-B0550AE6-2F6A-4AE9-A6E3-C6FF4588D676Q21093215-7BFA9E23-A6BD-4457-B0B5-581912C31B46Q21144675-D8A41DD8-D853-4A3B-81D9-0CCEDEAE29ACQ21245257-59B634E6-0D17-4655-A952-D78B10D6E050Q21563406-0149D268-7372-45DF-AF66-B353BC6DAB05Q24273352-F3BD75C2-C733-413E-8502-E9A887287F35Q24288938-76D61CB8-7130-45C2-B09E-827FD6B3FF4AQ24289327-B9D31247-45BC-4D22-82B3-042E3EAE73E8Q24289348-3585F02D-21C4-47B7-B172-E862507FB16FQ24289354-0D14B088-D86D-4B93-94E0-E45ECFED3BD3Q24289476-671F0E61-1D25-49A4-864B-373499F16DA0Q24289540-65F2EE4E-D61D-475E-9C33-E03260244A85Q24602353-A97E9502-214D-4C76-8EE6-6E55371BEFA6Q24614045-7B88EFE3-0198-4140-AD7F-7B3774C3E2FDQ24614627-507E1DFD-7B60-46FB-8A4A-418314FCCEBBQ24614702-3AE1D045-F004-4384-8374-32441692A2D0Q24614759-2DC370B9-306D-4282-BEFF-A39F6D53B912Q24644748-E7AF991A-D820-4556-95D1-BA4ED0E0CD5DQ26798058-FE7D81DD-37FE-469E-A6C8-B22BD1A6D627Q26799186-D46EDCA5-DE9C-4766-8697-FBD90DC4F4BAQ26866555-0771DFEE-B8AF-41D9-A0FE-DDD7AA8424EEQ27022319-6CD801FE-55E0-4A05-85CB-0B8766DCCB08Q27025304-E470485F-FEE0-4E4F-A84A-FF2C76A23DDBQ27025940-DB367AF9-BAF8-451C-8D01-846FF90BB08EQ27860581-414E11EC-1473-4761-A2B7-CD444925BED7Q28066901-B714D447-39B0-4AC4-BEBB-FFDA13638BC4Q28268166-FE34F456-F633-4E00-91BB-1BE2D269DB4BQ28656466-20D5477D-DA1B-448E-877B-032B1F9580ABQ28730286-2C428E99-5A33-4738-A12B-8C1D1418A835Q28731819-B5DAD0F4-F1F8-42CB-9824-B7188E256602Q29547313-2E3D5EBE-F3B9-4809-A0EC-9A92CEFF6EA6Q30381869-662C7150-6748-4B99-9BB8-AD440FEE3A49Q30395573-4B2D4A59-C948-4B2E-82C9-B66C8DB53B52Q30484925-AAEE34A8-74D9-477C-B4B9-4DA4D9B3E6E8Q30488988-82551751-2722-4E46-AB82-D80E9440F3FDQ30586422-305E1A8E-C3BF-4641-9AE8-A3D93EE34D38Q30670694-219B11BC-1FF7-4484-B754-30B6CC5CA4A2Q30828900-222D7209-9359-406D-89D7-A89FF078CF62Q30984375-C8FF48E6-6FD1-4F8F-B1C4-11C1C56210A1
P2860
Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年論文
@yue
2006年論文
@zh-hant
2006年論文
@zh-hk
2006年論文
@zh-mo
2006年論文
@zh-tw
2006年论文
@wuu
2006年论文
@zh
2006年论文
@zh-cn
name
Does the CONSORT checklist imp ...... d trials? A systematic review.
@ast
Does the CONSORT checklist imp ...... d trials? A systematic review.
@en
type
label
Does the CONSORT checklist imp ...... d trials? A systematic review.
@ast
Does the CONSORT checklist imp ...... d trials? A systematic review.
@en
prefLabel
Does the CONSORT checklist imp ...... d trials? A systematic review.
@ast
Does the CONSORT checklist imp ...... d trials? A systematic review.
@en
P2093
P1476
Does the CONSORT checklist imp ...... ed trials? A systematic review
@en
P2093
Amy C Plint
Andra Morrison
Catherine Hill
David Moher
Isabelle Gaboury
Kenneth Schulz
P304
P407
P577
2006-09-01T00:00:00Z