The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients.
about
Coronary CT and the coronary calcium score, the future of ED risk stratification?Chest pain: coronary CT in the ER.Detection of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina in the acute setting: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of multi-detector computed tomographic angiography.Quick identification of acute chest pain patients study (QICS).The Big Picture: Evidence Base and Current Trials in Cardiac CTEfficacy and safety of the computed tomography coronary angiography based approach for patients with acute chest pain at an emergency department: one month clinical follow-up studyComputed tomographic coronary artery calcium assessment for evaluating chest pain in the emergency department: long-term outcome of a prospective blind studyResponsible use of computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease and chest pain.Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in community hospitals: "current and emerging role".Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in a large population of patients without revascularisation: registry data in NSTEMI acute coronary syndrome and influence of gender and risk factors.Efficacy of multi-detector coronary computed tomography angiography in comparison with exercise electrocardiogram in the triage of patients of low risk acute chest painComputer-aided simple triage (CAST) for coronary CT angiography (CCTA).The diagnostic performance of multi-slice coronary computed tomographic angiography: a systematic review.Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.Diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes of ECG-gated, whole chest CT in the emergency department.Is coronary computed tomography angiography a resource sparing strategy in the risk stratification and evaluation of acute chest pain? Results of a randomized controlled trial.Limitations of risk score models in patients with acute chest pain.Stress testing and non-invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: time for a new paradigm.Dual-source computed tomography in patients with acute chest pain: feasibility and image quality.Detection of myocardial perfusion abnormalities: standard dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography versus rest/stress technetium-99m single-photo emission CT.Coronary computerized tomography angiography for rapid discharge of low-risk patients with cocaine-associated chest pain.Progress and Current State of Coronary CT.Whole-chest 64-MDCT of emergency department patients with nonspecific chest pain: Radiation dose and coronary artery image quality with prospective ECG triggering versus retrospective ECG gating.Low-risk patients with chest pain in the emergency department: negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography may reduce length of stay and hospital charges.Cost and resource utilization associated with use of computed tomography to evaluate chest pain in the emergency department: the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) study.Cardiac CT in the emergency department: convincing evidence, but cautious implementation.Chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy.A meta-analysis and systematic review of computed tomography angiography as a diagnostic triage tool for patients with chest pain presenting to the emergency department.Potential role of coronary computed tomography-angiography for guiding perioperative cardiac management for non-cardiac surgery.Cardiac computed tomography in patients with acute chest pain.Diagnostic Accuracy of 64-Slice MDCT Coronary Angiography for the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Korean Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Coronary computed tomography angiography for the assessment of chest pain: current status and future directions.Cardiac CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain.Dose reduction with iterative reconstruction for coronary CT angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Noninvasive cardiac imaging in suspected acute coronary syndrome.The incremental value of stress testing in patients with acute chest pain beyond serial cardiac troponin testing.Efficiency and safety of coronary CT angiography compared to standard care in the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain: a Canadian study.Impact of 64-slice coronary CT on the management of patients presenting with acute chest pain: results of a prospective two-centre study.Actual financial comparison of four strategies to evaluate patients with potential acute coronary syndromes.Comparison of mid- to long-term clinical outcomes between anatomical testing and usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.
P2860
Q27005809-77CDB217-191A-40C0-BC99-210F518C054BQ30357516-82B9BE56-1B1C-4B1E-A087-BA605F9DD02BQ33311384-5C33E51B-0514-40AA-8FEB-5A28E46CF9BEQ33467558-F13846D4-BEF3-484C-9934-1CC150DF3529Q33665103-3AC6EB0D-E4E5-4A36-BD33-C27B433AEB57Q33680024-40B9F9A4-3610-4FC4-80B3-82E582517578Q33765034-706C821C-5987-47C9-9FC7-D4550EEA5069Q33765065-7C52478F-F96A-413A-933D-1A52761EF1BCQ33888290-9E195136-FE96-403E-94FE-0797C2C1B54EQ33924015-AEEAE74E-099C-4B77-B4A0-E30A2543374EQ34112593-8DABD137-C62C-4340-ACD7-A8585C9DBA2EQ34266670-821F5F0B-D8CF-4205-801B-CF266A2C165BQ34594540-D84DC7F7-5CB6-48C9-ADBE-51DD77AFBF78Q34604478-F801AF22-21E5-45FA-A80B-EA74E157D015Q34684079-8594D2A6-486F-4C6D-BB41-017CA431F487Q35118631-23C68273-BC0D-4139-9F79-B49FC6B71386Q35384580-A2DB0695-E3D9-417B-927B-21F141CCFFC3Q36004976-8CCB0EAF-13FA-4DD9-945E-F03DF2752306Q36143698-B29D8591-13DB-419A-AB10-26BEBFB76AE1Q36324143-87865385-1939-41ED-BEE3-D5B799C22179Q36549404-79446A40-8D1E-482A-BB6C-88AC9C3A2E4EQ36679259-8A8D3269-DCF3-4B48-87D9-5FA2366CBBF4Q36964163-3860A45B-8F5E-48F4-B52E-4C683A6AAAADQ37095814-E1D3AE27-1607-4086-9EB0-D6CA345B5839Q37465752-2EA69E89-0C38-4BF8-8F6F-8AB42BD9FB95Q37848116-FD1563B8-E69E-42FC-9912-3F3AFF530AAFQ37867085-AD9AA50F-9E23-4534-B900-D302F7465B18Q37982963-4082024E-D408-4228-8B0D-6F69E7C9766FQ38157946-9C4CC799-3EEB-47D7-BAC0-D8BA0DFFA1CDQ38357689-09026950-A78B-4ED6-BDBA-58EB70A9473FQ38452941-9B5B88B8-2FA2-4963-B7A5-880A2C54F09EQ38541750-18549F02-058D-49C4-BF6E-01A66D2E3F71Q38581423-06F0B293-7B3D-4E2E-A37F-1762D2A169B6Q38631737-3398D7F2-4B96-47A3-B247-A3657A432F5BQ38748693-7F894C9A-922F-4926-B47D-7E9030F6BF69Q38948903-B0FB3A62-B984-46C3-98E1-1921794FF68DQ39739492-D1AB7DF3-CFBD-4A7B-9087-CBFF410FD676Q44978702-8727DADC-FA56-4291-9A53-BFDC115F39FAQ46675994-5E4E5953-454E-4A8A-B275-73C36504C5D1Q48339157-C900B983-B915-46B4-BAC8-53493C1C1A13
P2860
The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年論文
@yue
2006年論文
@zh-hant
2006年論文
@zh-hk
2006年論文
@zh-mo
2006年論文
@zh-tw
2006年论文
@wuu
2006年论文
@zh
2006年论文
@zh-cn
name
The diagnostic accuracy of 64- ...... low-risk chest pain patients.
@ast
The diagnostic accuracy of 64- ...... low-risk chest pain patients.
@en
type
label
The diagnostic accuracy of 64- ...... low-risk chest pain patients.
@ast
The diagnostic accuracy of 64- ...... low-risk chest pain patients.
@en
prefLabel
The diagnostic accuracy of 64- ...... low-risk chest pain patients.
@ast
The diagnostic accuracy of 64- ...... low-risk chest pain patients.
@en
P2093
P1476
The diagnostic accuracy of 64- ...... low-risk chest pain patients.
@en
P2093
Brian O'Neil
Gilbert L Raff
James A Goldstein
Michael A Ross
Michael J Gallagher
William W O'Neill
P304
P356
10.1016/J.ANNEMERGMED.2006.06.043
P407
P577
2006-09-15T00:00:00Z