Self-rated evaluation of outcome of the implantation of interspinous process distraction (X-Stop) for neurogenic claudication
about
A Systematic Review of Interspinous Dynamic StabilizationInterspinous spacers in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal disease: our experience with DIAM and Aperius devicesClinical outcomes of a polyaxial interspinous fusion systemSafety and efficacy of a new percutaneously implantable interspinous process deviceMinimally invasive treatment of moderate lumbar spinal stenosis with the superion interspinous spacer.A review of interspinous fusion devices: High complication, reoperation rates, and costs with poor outcomes.Interspinous spacers for lumbar foraminal stenosis: formal trials are justified.Effectiveness of interspinous implant surgery in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Interspinous distractor devices for the management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a miracle cure for a common problem?Minimally invasive procedures on the lumbar spine.The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: A survey of the “surgical and research” articles in the European Spine Journal, 2008.The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the “medical” articles in the European Spine Journal, 2008.Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis results in increased reoperation rates and costs without improving patient outcomes.
P2860
Q26786721-098A3969-538F-4817-89ED-7D2883E60950Q34918584-79FA43CE-7F45-4857-87BB-96E455111846Q35076064-83E6180C-DDAA-437E-A99B-EF3E3B28FBD6Q35083975-1DBBDC24-176D-4168-90AD-B7CB8EDA5F81Q35444249-8D720A8D-D8BD-4693-AA0D-7B17B129DA6DQ35758465-16F23298-A3D0-4A7C-BE85-64C6AFF946ABQ36627273-62F2F229-C104-49AB-BFE0-2D363CFB001BQ37888533-A88C6A76-74A8-4047-9F72-14574A51A9F1Q38009836-A7291446-37A3-423F-8AF2-2001C440F63EQ38328052-27F70FA0-A670-46B0-81C0-6B83677D0F32Q45957962-62081B84-059D-4F92-9996-3BB108B756C2Q45958090-331E9E40-39DB-4676-BE37-6D96A9A6DA13Q53621777-8079DE25-F449-441E-BB63-F928165C96A5
P2860
Self-rated evaluation of outcome of the implantation of interspinous process distraction (X-Stop) for neurogenic claudication
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
2007年论文
@zh
2007年论文
@zh-cn
name
Self-rated evaluation of outco ...... p) for neurogenic claudication
@ast
Self-rated evaluation of outco ...... p) for neurogenic claudication
@en
type
label
Self-rated evaluation of outco ...... p) for neurogenic claudication
@ast
Self-rated evaluation of outco ...... p) for neurogenic claudication
@en
prefLabel
Self-rated evaluation of outco ...... p) for neurogenic claudication
@ast
Self-rated evaluation of outco ...... p) for neurogenic claudication
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Self-rated evaluation of outco ...... p) for neurogenic claudication
@en
P2093
André L M Verbeek
Jakob Hauth
Paul Brussee
Roland D Donk
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00586-007-0540-6
P577
2007-10-31T00:00:00Z