Scientific dissent and public policy. Is targeting dissent a reasonable way to protect sound policy decisions?
about
Censoring government scientists and the role of consensus in science advice: a structured process for scientific advice in governments and peer-review in academia should shape science communication strategiesIs it appropriate to ‘target’ inappropriate dissent? on the normative consequences of climate skepticism
P2860
Scientific dissent and public policy. Is targeting dissent a reasonable way to protect sound policy decisions?
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
2012年论文
@zh
2012年论文
@zh-cn
name
Scientific dissent and public ...... rotect sound policy decisions?
@ast
Scientific dissent and public ...... rotect sound policy decisions?
@en
type
label
Scientific dissent and public ...... rotect sound policy decisions?
@ast
Scientific dissent and public ...... rotect sound policy decisions?
@en
prefLabel
Scientific dissent and public ...... rotect sound policy decisions?
@ast
Scientific dissent and public ...... rotect sound policy decisions?
@en
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Scientific dissent and public ...... rotect sound policy decisions?
@en
P2093
Kristen Intemann
P2860
P304
P356
10.1038/EMBOR.2013.8
P577
2012-02-08T00:00:00Z