The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands
about
Retrieval interference in reflexive processing: experimental evidence from Mandarin, and computational modelingWhy it's easier to remember seeing a face we already know than one we don't: preexisting memory representations facilitate memory formation.Differential Linguistic Recall Effects in the California Verbal Learning Test in Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Dementia: Analysis of Routine Diagnostic Data.Valence and arousal ratings for 420 Finnish nouns by age and genderMechanisms supporting superior source memory for familiar items: a multi-voxel pattern analysis study.Midazolam does not inhibit association formation, just its storage and strengtheningNegative effects of item repetition on source memory.Applying Psycholinguistic Evidence to the Construction of a New Test of Verbal Memory in Late-Life Cognitive Decline.The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model.Cortical Networks Involved in Memory for Temporal Order.The bilingual L2 advantage in recognition memory.The component structure of ERP subsequent memory effects in the Von Restorff paradigm and the word frequency effect in recall.Episodic intertrial learning of younger and older adults: effects of word frequency.Bilingual recognition memory: stronger performance but weaker levels-of-processing effects in the less fluent language.Memory strength effects in fMRI studies: a matter of confidence.
P2860
Q24273340-D2F8D588-A917-4A51-8D97-E040B536F246Q30588602-26FA1DAD-3623-4A7B-A458-1AF732BB54EBQ31115056-C7E822DC-CBDD-481D-9325-0571B07DDCC1Q34983627-75D22822-8432-4C1A-9076-1E77CEDFCA36Q36354276-5103F4BA-9C6B-4831-A38C-3A89573F70E6Q36663426-76678493-217A-4AE1-AC75-180C0A82718BQ37041503-20BA40A3-EC74-4B3C-BE2F-BE4CCC4535EDQ38381207-AA6242EE-4FD3-43D0-AD37-E0661F4CA2BFQ42208951-8B856853-84C3-4CFF-872B-7777F1CE3DB5Q42644227-9499F837-A741-47B4-B058-515BBAA00A8EQ45015740-F1A8740A-8287-4264-9D53-ABC7F93AE1B0Q46365859-CE21D1A2-FAB2-4D78-B498-6359C0C68FFCQ50955028-A3C1EF3F-6A39-4C35-8CB9-3D8C766F9B1FQ50982920-804BF021-2311-4D11-83D5-30B6175E66F8Q51028565-D31D7395-C28E-4408-97AF-956A34F1561A
P2860
The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年論文
@yue
2006年論文
@zh-hant
2006年論文
@zh-hk
2006年論文
@zh-mo
2006年論文
@zh-tw
2006年论文
@wuu
2006年论文
@zh
2006年论文
@zh-cn
name
The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands
@ast
The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands
@en
type
label
The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands
@ast
The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands
@en
prefLabel
The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands
@ast
The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands
@en
P2860
P1476
The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands
@en
P2860
P304
P356
10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.805
P577
2006-07-01T00:00:00Z