Efficient attentional selection predicts distractor devaluation: event-related potential evidence for a direct link between attention and emotion.
about
Stimulus-category competition, inhibition, and affective devaluation: a novel account of the uncanny valleyThe N2pc component and its links to attention shifts and spatially selective visual processingInfant Cries Rattle Adult Cognition.Stimulus discriminability may bias value-based probabilistic learningActive listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: an ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention.A comparative study of sustained attentional bias on emotional processing in ADHD children to pictures with eye-tracking.Appraisal of space words and allocation of emotion words in bodily space.Response inhibition results in the emotional devaluation of faces: neural correlates as revealed by fMRI.Cortical Brain Activity Reflecting Attentional Biasing Toward Reward-Predicting Cues Covaries with Economic Decision-Making Performance.Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: evidence from event-related brain potentials.Response inhibition is linked to emotional devaluation: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.Attentional capture by visual singletons is mediated by top-down task set: new evidence from the N2pc component.Does focused endogenous attention prevent attentional capture in pop-out visual search?The roles of feature-specific task set and bottom-up salience in attentional capture: an ERP study.Valuation of Go Stimuli or Devaluation of No-Go Stimuli? Evidence of an Increased Preference for Attended Go Stimuli Following a Go/No-Go Task.Electrophysiological evidence of semantic interference in visual search.Specific fear modulates attentional selectivity during visual search: electrophysiological insights from the N2pc.The presented probability modulates emotional evaluation of neutral stimuli: insights from ERPs in Go/Nogo task.Perception of facial expression depends on prior attention.Less approach, more avoidance: Response inhibition has motivational consequences for sexual stimuli that reflect changes in affective value not a lingering global brake on behavior.History effects in visual search for monsters: search times, choice biases, and liking.Blaming the victims of your own mistakes: How visual search accuracy influences evaluation of stimuli.Alterations in affective processing of attack images following September 11, 2001.Does ignoring lead to worse evaluations? A new explanation of the stimulus devaluation effect.Stimulus devaluation induced by stopping action.
P2860
Q21129121-DCB91339-A42B-4D2F-9BB2-1391DE362275Q24645554-8F865079-6D4B-4E0C-A054-97D205861E07Q30382654-63346B52-941A-4CEB-BD96-EE85E3FEE02BQ33648106-67448075-03E3-4D61-AC50-CA6C5D825823Q34115139-35A32417-E505-48FD-814F-7A7D1B7FC75BQ35066233-27C99CE7-2C6A-4D27-B59F-8358AE19B8E3Q35069724-D512B894-801E-4CFE-AB2D-13EFF196B46AQ36189845-E9190821-6C12-45AF-AF1B-32BA5BA8AD7DQ36368727-A6E84BBF-5DD9-45BA-9EB4-8E5232B0E1ADQ36929290-DABD8BB2-8991-4622-AB42-8B2CCF801B18Q36947146-D92905B3-1F78-46C6-A9D8-47D56D0E98FBQ37069420-22156FAA-63EC-487B-A637-5BA0F5DBA37FQ37427092-1EE21E75-B084-4775-B8E8-E7EFEAD6C3F0Q37428875-38CAE27F-C6C8-4E88-84D1-DC8C05B3C4AEQ37741883-39CF9C2C-4CBF-4FC5-A452-14F5960B5943Q38378550-AE6C70D1-C1E1-4761-8171-26CA57FCBE79Q42010539-F33C577E-815E-4BBB-B41B-97BB73F0D962Q43669789-39CFBEE9-C460-4D86-A436-6B99B6D738D8Q45243981-64AE3021-BFE7-4DD8-829B-EDC5B1BF136DQ47347633-D0C2F86C-3EE8-4839-AAAF-878A0FB3C641Q47796431-59F4F225-FA2D-4497-B750-7EE63BD6523FQ47798988-8CA82675-7EC9-4CEE-B947-17838ABDB3A8Q48600834-3F11D807-4B81-426C-AD75-1483E0E59BEBQ50626735-7CBA7E9D-9C9C-4F08-87F8-B1B05B83EBC6Q51584556-86398D8D-5BFC-4726-B7A8-48446E84281C
P2860
Efficient attentional selection predicts distractor devaluation: event-related potential evidence for a direct link between attention and emotion.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
2007年论文
@zh
2007年论文
@zh-cn
name
Efficient attentional selectio ...... between attention and emotion.
@ast
Efficient attentional selectio ...... between attention and emotion.
@en
type
label
Efficient attentional selectio ...... between attention and emotion.
@ast
Efficient attentional selectio ...... between attention and emotion.
@en
prefLabel
Efficient attentional selectio ...... between attention and emotion.
@ast
Efficient attentional selectio ...... between attention and emotion.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Efficient attentional selectio ...... between attention and emotion.
@en
P2093
Anna C Nobre
Brian A Goolsby
Jane E Raymond
John G Taylor
Kimron L Shapiro
Laetitia Silvert
Martin Eimer
Monika Kiss
Nickolaos Fragopanagos
P2860
P304
P356
10.1162/JOCN.2007.19.8.1316
P577
2007-08-01T00:00:00Z