Percutaneous left ventricular assist device in high risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

about

Percutaneous left ventricular assist device in high risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36724085

description

2016 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2016年の論文

@ja

2016年論文

@yue

2016年論文

@zh-hant

2016年論文

@zh-hk

2016年論文

@zh-mo

2016年論文

@zh-tw

2016年论文

@wuu

2016年论文

@zh

2016年论文

@zh-cn

name

Percutaneous left ventricular ...... taneous coronary intervention.

@ast

Percutaneous left ventricular ...... taneous coronary intervention.

@en

type

Item

label

Percutaneous left ventricular ...... taneous coronary intervention.

@ast

Percutaneous left ventricular ...... taneous coronary intervention.

@en

prefLabel

Percutaneous left ventricular ...... taneous coronary intervention.

@ast

Percutaneous left ventricular ...... taneous coronary intervention.

@en

P1476

Percutaneous left ventricular ...... taneous coronary intervention.

@en

P2093

Konstantinos Dean Boudoulas

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Omar Kahaly

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012).

Bleeding in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the development of a clinical risk algorithm from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Effects of left ventricular unloading by Impella recover LP2.5 on coronary hemodynamics.

A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.

Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.

2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study.

Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

Left ventricular unloading and concomitant total cardiac output increase by the use of percutaneous Impella Recover LP 2.5 assist device during high-risk coronary intervention.

Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

P304

298-302

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

editorial

P356

10.21037/JTD.2016.01.77

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2016-03-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

27076921

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

4805787

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string