Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005.
about
Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: The European and US ExperienceThe diffusion of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in the United States: a case study of the introduction of new surgical devices.Robotic surgery in urologic oncology: gathering the evidence.Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers.Oncologic outcome after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 10 years of experience.Factors affecting the outcome of extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: pelvic arch interference and depth of the pelvic cavityPilot study of salvage laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of recurrent prostate cancer.Staging of prostate cancer.Comparison of surgical technique (open vs. laparoscopic) on pathological and long term functional outcomes following radical prostatectomy.Prevalence and risk factors of bladder neck contracture after radical prostatectomy.Using a population-based observational cohort study to address difficult comparative effectiveness research questions: the CEASAR study.Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomyArguments against investing widely in robotic prostatectomy in Canada: a wrong focus on tool box rather than surgical expertiseScientific and technical advances in continence recovery following radical prostatectomy.Is there any evidence of superiority between retropubic, laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.Significance and management of positive surgical margins at the time of radical prostatectomyThe Australian laparoscopic non robotic radical prostatectomy experience - analysis of 2943 cases (USANZ supplement).Intraoperative use of tranexamic acid to reduce transfusion rate in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial.Retropubic radical prostatectomy: Clinicopathological observations and outcome analysis of 428 consecutive patients.Comments on the extraperitoneal approach for standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: what is gained and what is lost.Perioperative blood loss in open retropubic radical prostatectomy - Is it safe to get operated at an educational hospital?Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological outcome analysis from a single-center Indian experience of 6 years.Blood storage duration and biochemical recurrence of cancer after radical prostatectomy.Venous thromboembolism after radical prostatectomy: the effect of surgical caseload.Comparison of 90-day re-admission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).Teaching laparoscopic radical prostatectomy during the primary surgeon's early learning curve--analysis of our first 207 cases.Postoperative phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor administration increases the rate of urinary continence recovery after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.Positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with pT2 and pT3a disease could be considered pathological upstaging.Comparison of outcomes between pure laparoscopic vs robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a study of comparative effectiveness based upon validated quality of life outcomes.Midterm oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy (RP).Prospective longitudinal outcomes of quality of life after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostatectomy.Perioperative outcomes of open radical prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in Asian men: comparison of two initial series by the same surgeon.Assessment of postoperative quality of life: comparative study between laparoscopic and minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomies.Laparoscopic Approach for Intravesical Surgery Using Pneumovesicum in Urology: Literature Review.Factors related to patient-perceived satisfaction after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on the expanded prostate cancer index composite survey.A case-mix-adjusted comparison of early oncological outcomes of open and robotic prostatectomy performed by experienced high volume surgeons.Urethral-fixation technique improves early urinary continence recovery in patients who undergo retropubic radical prostatectomy.Trends in the care of radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2006.Robotic and open radical prostatectomy: is there reason to be receptive to change now and in the future?
P2860
Q24633135-A6BE08EF-E399-407D-BE13-41F782551488Q30205705-9AC4B327-99DF-4B58-828E-B99B32F0B509Q30432095-715432B0-AA2E-4B4A-B8B5-46D7EF5BF6A7Q34143199-CC483A57-875D-4D47-BBE8-0E1D7C57A59DQ34232239-CF320833-353C-4883-A13C-8B4BDBF9E975Q34567894-0864CE7A-1C37-466F-9E79-439B01D5EA7EQ34626224-8ABA9F0B-D186-42A3-91E9-E468FFFD8887Q34634756-9D3DA02A-422F-4011-8F21-9239AC5B48D2Q35088913-45AFB672-FA12-4A24-9A90-A2509309198DQ36859810-F3E0FCED-C0C6-4D9C-BA36-71B13461B8D1Q37035993-1B137D68-B0C3-4322-B979-473481ABC951Q37339698-088486E4-84DE-4612-9B72-E4C1521B95CDQ37472505-E5C6DCC3-E2A3-498F-8C91-256BC70BFC80Q37538752-4F853012-6AE1-4A3E-AC18-B855C15B76F2Q37873972-B1DAACD8-7B0E-4CD2-8559-B3F9EAEDB28CQ38165283-BD4ACD3C-5D25-49BD-94F5-DE1B2F1E484DQ38266018-6EE4FA03-99FA-44BB-8D73-B4D0E83EBE01Q38409295-7A3591DB-B096-4A16-BC0A-0D0A65E08876Q38482466-E83BD29B-4407-426C-ABE1-FE5121BCFFACQ38710626-DDC995F9-1BC1-41DC-82A6-2F08728CCA05Q38755459-4513C3F3-5106-4A1D-86F9-1D7D5C63E102Q41779669-F76537FF-B6A7-453D-B2B5-68E4594F97D2Q42053807-48CF0956-DD5A-420C-A4B9-A0952D346568Q42586342-BF47A918-3E6E-426A-AFC6-3B8BC3CFC1C6Q42635347-1DB7D3AA-79FB-4F92-836C-9194296555FAQ42646010-B6E1A492-5311-4152-B12E-840FCFE00F96Q42660304-68C0731F-90C1-4DC8-9D99-A21B0D9D51ABQ42667696-03FF247F-B2D4-47F1-B18B-A8A904D78BCCQ43589476-64733952-8D9E-4350-A74C-2BFC2AD7A77AQ43713238-081680D0-AF59-4869-AEAF-07B48352F147Q46485964-EA2477D3-FFE8-47B9-B245-22508A1CB2A0Q47204477-F480CFC6-035A-473E-B7F7-364BB701A560Q47900692-61008368-885E-49A4-8DAA-1DA4DE7978BAQ48109407-FA1FD991-4E16-4022-93D9-22C89BE4346DQ48132183-03F3E6AE-56E8-4E21-9408-B719066684E6Q48192895-F457274B-F5E6-4C7C-AF57-702792A9440BQ51273356-DEE139F7-61D5-492F-8789-486C821B350FQ51353271-85E7680D-84DD-4374-92F4-ADC11FAEE4BEQ51635897-DB82363D-C832-4C2E-92A9-BB7A5423C0EAQ51813455-27016EC5-77B8-4491-BA31-CC824FCD9A60
P2860
Comprehensive prospective comparative analysis of outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy conducted in 2003 to 2005.
description
2008 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2008年の論文
@ja
2008年論文
@yue
2008年論文
@zh-hant
2008年論文
@zh-hk
2008年論文
@zh-mo
2008年論文
@zh-tw
2008年论文
@wuu
2008年论文
@zh
2008年论文
@zh-cn
name
Comprehensive prospective comp ...... omy conducted in 2003 to 2005.
@en
type
label
Comprehensive prospective comp ...... omy conducted in 2003 to 2005.
@en
prefLabel
Comprehensive prospective comp ...... omy conducted in 2003 to 2005.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Comprehensive prospective comp ...... omy conducted in 2003 to 2005.
@en
P2093
Angel Serio
Bertrand Guillonneau
Fernando P Secin
James A Eastham
Jason Stasi
Javier Romero Otero
Karim Touijer
Peter T Scardino
Rafael Sanchez-Salas
Victor E Reuter
P2860
P304
1811-7; discussion 1817
P356
10.1016/J.JURO.2008.01.026
P407
P577
2008-03-18T00:00:00Z