Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols. - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols.

Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36799675

about

Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia An Investigation of the Shortcomings of the CONSORT 2010 Statement for the Reporting of Group Sequential Randomised Controlled Trials: A Methodological Systematic Review Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: Guidance on Their Use Study design and quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of chronic idiopathic or autoimmune urticaria: review Description of the protocols for randomized controlled trials on cancer drugs conducted in Spain (1999-2003).Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies.From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials.SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials Impact of Selection Bias on Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Randomized Trials of Oral Health Interventions: A Meta-epidemiological Study.Bedaquiline versus placebo for management of multiple drug-resistant tuberculosis: A systematic review How do systematic reviews of acupuncture for pain relief incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis? A methodological study.State of reporting of primary biomedical research: a scoping review protocol.Information on blinding in registered records of clinical trials.Review and publication of protocol submissions to Trials - what have we learned in 10 years?Current practice in methodology and reporting of the sample size calculation in randomised trials of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a systematic review Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Treatment of Adult Patients with High-Grade Gliomas.Exploring the characteristics, global distribution and reasons for retraction of published articles involving human research participants: a literature survey.A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research.Impact of missing individual patient data on 18 meta-analyses of randomised trials in oncology: Gustave Roussy experience

P2860

Q24193040-C4419FCC-FA1D-4E36-BC7F-5AFE6B313D89 Q26777085-31736964-8C5D-443F-96FF-7BEBA62F6704 Q28651692-5442B79F-1F33-4B01-89C4-215EF4EF7DE2 Q28710019-96F82CC2-6B13-4CEF-BC51-5EC67B415056 Q30000075-62BD22F0-8E32-47CC-B63F-0EC43A760784 Q34935840-F1C24303-BD01-4FA9-8063-0F932235AA21 Q35043881-26A31A33-F978-4231-9B44-3B675213E51E Q36072546-CE5FFEF1-7BB1-4FD8-8D14-3CF8CC7B2786 Q36600030-3FE97EF2-8242-4179-9DA3-376C759DC712 Q37420941-4911614E-4660-46C5-AA73-67B488C15CAB Q38072250-F54E2DBE-7C69-41C7-9419-BD554BC61524 Q38622282-D2FA1489-0278-4C78-95B7-6F05DC69967F Q38820676-931959B0-3F8E-418D-972E-68730F80ED88 Q39181295-1EC0802F-53B3-46AE-B25C-1BE455DD126D Q39209608-889305D4-3B0C-44DF-B9F5-CAAE4A54C42A Q39560299-73C65F68-975C-4224-A5A3-076E1ED3FE83 Q42328582-449083A4-7038-4C8F-A8E0-A47D70B1B793 Q42374147-75468621-DE6C-4027-88D1-3382C83ADEAE Q47842103-AFC8BB52-4F8B-4B19-9CE9-77715F1369F1 Q48506072-3BAF84EF-96C2-4DA4-BA9A-84F7EE2F43BB Q50081852-87C100D7-326F-41C2-BE17-496484CBF171 Q58786116-F1B243CB-B468-4614-89B8-B91E079100ED

P2860

Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols.

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36799675

description

2012 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2012年の論文

@ja

2012年論文

@yue

2012年論文

@zh-hant

2012年論文

@zh-hk

2012年論文

@zh-mo

2012年論文

@zh-tw

2012年论文

@wuu

2012年论文

@zh

2012年论文

@zh-cn

name

Published methodological quali ...... quality assessed in protocols.

@ast

Published methodological quali ...... quality assessed in protocols.

@en

type

label

Published methodological quali ...... quality assessed in protocols.

@ast

Published methodological quali ...... quality assessed in protocols.

@en

prefLabel

Published methodological quali ...... quality assessed in protocols.

@ast

Published methodological quali ...... quality assessed in protocols.

@en

P1433

Q36799675-9B755C26-7DB2-4992-9A07-9258B1F2D9B8

P1476

Q36799675-D551D63F-B96A-44F9-9A18-013FEAEB0328

P2093

Q36799675-047D4426-1D3C-47CE-BC07-CA246C5136D7

Q36799675-2566F864-6AAC-4420-853D-134502E7ED0F

Q36799675-285CC843-2054-4417-B4D5-E13115B59272

Q36799675-3A007E4D-85C0-4D02-9966-C13F560F8679

P2860

Q36799675-01A1771F-9040-450C-A703-BEBD53A24149

Q36799675-0476B70F-6265-4209-A8BE-D1200A030F80

Q36799675-1F03B919-B9CE-4C57-BEB2-4C9CB12D290D

Q36799675-2A01E0C3-6B3C-4CD8-8DEC-B1CC29BF4932

Q36799675-4C64476F-8B21-4882-8DB5-3ADFF8DABC3B

Q36799675-56ED2A6C-DAE9-4826-9BA1-0AFD3838C2F6

Q36799675-61C990B4-93F4-44C3-84E1-A5340EF98907

Q36799675-672F27E9-0521-48A7-87F6-EEAD8A8B230D

Q36799675-6A619387-70FB-4131-A326-05C34EABD618

Q36799675-74474F10-9D60-4522-8D3F-C5F78EEE1112

P304

Q36799675-7A763F9E-4095-4FEC-9801-DD517EDD3307

P31

Q36799675-2BC1C54A-FF9F-451C-8B5E-C25B8DBA8A41

P356

Q36799675-ACE04762-D950-49AB-B029-073D23175728

P433

Q36799675-DE9873C3-429E-40D9-9B17-16A72FF08FF1

P478

Q36799675-B5B9700C-6876-48B0-9FCD-4AD077E0E43C

P50

Q36799675-DB27B180-F78F-4877-B0C0-A24B53F3EE4C

P577

Q36799675-FBE63E12-0B9E-4542-AE45-8FAA7E8DE8C1

P5875

Q36799675-D09DBB5E-3EE8-4049-B055-ACFB7509531A

P698

Q36799675-87D3B71E-F173-4AE8-B07F-A0A2E1A9C60C

P932

Q36799675-55D34B48-F014-438B-B48D-48FABA4090C7

P356

J.JCLINEPI.2011.10.016

P1433

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

P1476

Published methodological quali ...... quality assessed in protocols.

@en

P2093

Ambuj Kumar

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Anja Magazin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Heloisa P Soares

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Rahul Mhaskar

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis

Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials

Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement

Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses

Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?

Registering clinical trials

How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. I: Medical.

P304

602-609

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2011.10.016

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

6

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

65

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Benjamin Djulbegovic

P577

2012-03-16T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

221713439

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

22424985

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

3637913

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string