Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols.
about
Colony-stimulating factors for chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropeniaAn Investigation of the Shortcomings of the CONSORT 2010 Statement for the Reporting of Group Sequential Randomised Controlled Trials: A Methodological Systematic ReviewAvoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trialsSPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trialsIndividual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: Guidance on Their UseStudy design and quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of chronic idiopathic or autoimmune urticaria: reviewDescription of the protocols for randomized controlled trials on cancer drugs conducted in Spain (1999-2003).Empirical Evidence of Study Design Biases in Randomized Trials: Systematic Review of Meta-Epidemiological Studies.From protocol to published report: a study of consistency in the reporting of academic drug trials.SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trialsImpact of Selection Bias on Treatment Effect Size Estimates in Randomized Trials of Oral Health Interventions: A Meta-epidemiological Study.Bedaquiline versus placebo for management of multiple drug-resistant tuberculosis: A systematic reviewHow do systematic reviews of acupuncture for pain relief incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis? A methodological study.State of reporting of primary biomedical research: a scoping review protocol.Information on blinding in registered records of clinical trials.Review and publication of protocol submissions to Trials - what have we learned in 10 years?Current practice in methodology and reporting of the sample size calculation in randomised trials of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a systematic reviewQuality of Randomized Controlled Trials Reporting in the Treatment of Adult Patients with High-Grade Gliomas.Exploring the characteristics, global distribution and reasons for retraction of published articles involving human research participants: a literature survey.A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research.Impact of missing individual patient data on 18 meta-analyses of randomised trials in oncology: Gustave Roussy experience
P2860
Q24193040-C4419FCC-FA1D-4E36-BC7F-5AFE6B313D89Q26777085-31736964-8C5D-443F-96FF-7BEBA62F6704Q28651692-5442B79F-1F33-4B01-89C4-215EF4EF7DE2Q28710019-96F82CC2-6B13-4CEF-BC51-5EC67B415056Q30000075-62BD22F0-8E32-47CC-B63F-0EC43A760784Q34935840-F1C24303-BD01-4FA9-8063-0F932235AA21Q35043881-26A31A33-F978-4231-9B44-3B675213E51EQ36072546-CE5FFEF1-7BB1-4FD8-8D14-3CF8CC7B2786Q36600030-3FE97EF2-8242-4179-9DA3-376C759DC712Q37420941-4911614E-4660-46C5-AA73-67B488C15CABQ38072250-F54E2DBE-7C69-41C7-9419-BD554BC61524Q38622282-D2FA1489-0278-4C78-95B7-6F05DC69967FQ38820676-931959B0-3F8E-418D-972E-68730F80ED88Q39181295-1EC0802F-53B3-46AE-B25C-1BE455DD126DQ39209608-889305D4-3B0C-44DF-B9F5-CAAE4A54C42AQ39560299-73C65F68-975C-4224-A5A3-076E1ED3FE83Q42328582-449083A4-7038-4C8F-A8E0-A47D70B1B793Q42374147-75468621-DE6C-4027-88D1-3382C83ADEAEQ47842103-AFC8BB52-4F8B-4B19-9CE9-77715F1369F1Q48506072-3BAF84EF-96C2-4DA4-BA9A-84F7EE2F43BBQ50081852-87C100D7-326F-41C2-BE17-496484CBF171Q58786116-F1B243CB-B468-4614-89B8-B91E079100ED
P2860
Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols.
description
2012 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2012年の論文
@ja
2012年論文
@yue
2012年論文
@zh-hant
2012年論文
@zh-hk
2012年論文
@zh-mo
2012年論文
@zh-tw
2012年论文
@wuu
2012年论文
@zh
2012年论文
@zh-cn
name
Published methodological quali ...... quality assessed in protocols.
@ast
Published methodological quali ...... quality assessed in protocols.
@en
type
label
Published methodological quali ...... quality assessed in protocols.
@ast
Published methodological quali ...... quality assessed in protocols.
@en
prefLabel
Published methodological quali ...... quality assessed in protocols.
@ast
Published methodological quali ...... quality assessed in protocols.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Published methodological quali ...... quality assessed in protocols.
@en
P2093
Ambuj Kumar
Anja Magazin
Heloisa P Soares
Rahul Mhaskar
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2011.10.016
P577
2012-03-16T00:00:00Z