Addiction research ethics and the Belmont principles: do drug users have a different moral voice?
about
Social and structural constraints on disclosure and informed consent for HIV survey research involving female sex workers and their bar managers in the Philippines.A collaborative methodology for investigating the ethical conduct of research on female sex workers in the Philippines.Legal and ethical values in the resolution of research-related disputes: how can IRBS respond to participant complaints?Confidentiality, privacy, and respect: experiences of female sex workers participating in HIV research in Andhra Pradesh, IndiaParticipant and staff experiences in a peer-delivered HIV intervention with injection drug usersRisks and benefits of text message-delivered and small group-delivered sexual health interventions among African American women in the Midwestern U.S.Enhancing the Ethical Conduct of HIV Research with Migrant Sex Workers: Human Rights, Policy, and Social Contextual Influences.Peruvian Female Sex Workers' Ethical Perspectives on Their Participation in an HPV Vaccine Clinical TrialStructural and Interpersonal Benefits and Risks of Participation in HIV Research: Perspectives of Female Sex Workers in Guatemala.What women who use drugs have to say about ethical research: findings of an exploratory qualitative study.Is there a problem with the status quo? Debating the need for standalone ethical guidelines for research with people who use alcohol and other drugs.The Exploitation of Drug Users.Ethical Issues in Using Social Media to Deliver an HIV Prevention Intervention: Results from the HOPE Peru Study.Why female sex workers participate in HIV research: the illusion of voluntariness.Addiction industry studies: understanding how proconsumption influences block effective interventions.
P2860
Q30390375-5EDC4CE0-E8E1-4265-9F8F-C7F45CA71241Q30391454-95D89AB2-7EEE-4BE5-A3C8-84531B204ACCQ33696526-78896957-AFE0-485F-A4A3-BB6B611E6A86Q33952634-365316F5-0FBF-4C4B-A229-3144179E2747Q35054128-BCDC9B29-EBCC-4B60-A82F-A406DB000C88Q35146449-9D236010-464C-430B-B7C2-2527940CB1F9Q36012159-460695BB-215B-44CC-94C4-D467553E9A39Q37364798-E3BD9B44-9169-452F-822C-FDBDEABEAA4BQ37407387-0D5FF998-D8BA-4231-A665-20501AB12450Q37974104-8031F650-0A3B-4437-96C8-F73BFB1A4079Q38200696-81214667-A20C-4E46-84CA-5B5D3CED149FQ38585158-43735685-16B9-45FF-9646-19F8ECDAD9A1Q40427123-0D975CA3-7B44-4C5D-90F0-42492D55FD78Q44785229-95F7C158-EFF4-4A5D-9D3D-C5384E028400Q52302248-25460F5C-00E9-45D3-949B-381B9C0B738A
P2860
Addiction research ethics and the Belmont principles: do drug users have a different moral voice?
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
2010年论文
@zh
2010年论文
@zh-cn
name
Addiction research ethics and ...... have a different moral voice?
@ast
Addiction research ethics and ...... have a different moral voice?
@en
type
label
Addiction research ethics and ...... have a different moral voice?
@ast
Addiction research ethics and ...... have a different moral voice?
@en
prefLabel
Addiction research ethics and ...... have a different moral voice?
@ast
Addiction research ethics and ...... have a different moral voice?
@en
P2860
P1476
Addiction research ethics and ...... have a different moral voice?
@en
P2093
Celia B Fisher
P2860
P304
P356
10.3109/10826084.2010.528125
P577
2010-11-15T00:00:00Z