What determines patient satisfaction with surgery? A prospective cohort study of 4709 patients following total joint replacement.
about
Factors that shape the patient's hospital experience and satisfaction with lower limb arthroplasty: an exploratory thematic analysisBicruciate retainingFloor and ceiling effects in the OHS: an analysis of the NHS PROMs data set.Making the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores meaningful at the patient level through normative scoring and registry data.The Oxford knee score and its subscales do not exhibit a ceiling or a floor effect in knee arthroplasty patients: an analysis of the National Health Service PROMs data set.Implant Optimisation for Primary Hip Replacement in Patients over 60 Years with Osteoarthritis: A Cohort Study of Clinical Outcomes and Implant Costs Using Data from England and Wales.Outcomes of a joint replacement surgical home model clinical pathway.Robotic and navigation systems in orthopaedic surgery: how much do our patients understand?Have cementless and resurfacing components improved the medium-term results of hip replacement for patients under 60 years of age?No functional benefit of larger femoral heads and alternative bearings at 6 months following primary hip replacement.Patients' Perspectives of Surgical Safety: Do They Feel Safe?Defining an International Standard Set of Outcome Measures for Patients With Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis: Consensus of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Working GroupEvidence of non-response bias in the Press-Ganey patient satisfaction surveyIs Satisfaction with the Acute-Care Experience Higher amongst Consumers Treated in the Private Sector? A Survey of Public and Private Sector Arthroplasty Recipients.The importance of informational, clinical and personal support in patient experience with total knee replacement: a qualitative investigation.The Practical Application of Clinical Prediction Rules: A Commentary Using Case Examples in Surgical Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy.Perioperative local infiltration anesthesia with ropivacaine has no effect on postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty.Responsiveness and ceiling effects of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 following total hip arthroplasty.Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis.An exploration of patients' expectation of and satisfaction with surgical outcome.Over-optimistic patient expectations of recovery and leisure activities after arthroscopic meniscus surgeryTargeted rehabilitation to improve outcome after total knee replacement (TRIO): study protocol for a randomised controlled trialDefining a Research Agenda for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery: Using a Delphi Survey of Stakeholders.Improving theatre turnaround time.Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty.Associations between patient expectations of joint arthroplasty surgery and pre- and post-operative clinical status.Supporting the Delivery of Total Knee Replacements Care for Both Patients and Their Clinicians With a Mobile App and Web-Based Tool: Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.Comparison of patient quality of life scores and satisfaction after common orthopedic surgical interventions.Local infiltration analgesia: a 2-year follow-up of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.Determinants of satisfaction following total hip arthroplasty in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.Rehabilitation of revision total hip replacement: A multi-centre survey of current practice.Patient satisfaction in musculoskeletal medicine.The Nottingham Expectation and Complication score following Surgery (NECS): an universal scale for surgical outcome audit and peer comparison.Perspectives of orthopaedic surgeons on patients' appropriateness for total joint arthroplasty: a qualitative study.Survey Analysis of an Ambulatory Surgical Checklist for Patient Use.Randomized controlled trial of conventional versus modern surgical dressings following primary total hip and knee replacement.Patient expectation and satisfaction as measures of operative outcome in end-stage ankle arthritis: a prospective cohort study of total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion.Patient satisfaction with the perioperative surgical services and associated factors at a University Referral and Teaching Hospital, 2014: a cross-sectional study.What do we mean when we say an operation works?Opioid use in knee arthroplasty after receiving intravenous acetaminophen.
P2860
Q24658666-E9E2044B-24B2-40AD-8053-8C07FDCA4869Q26750957-09BE26FF-4293-4F65-B606-C04675A40A50Q30983087-FBC1F58B-3D87-4C8F-AC0A-DF5CF9FEC692Q30989982-4E20E1F7-1A5F-4BFC-A4FC-DE1C67FF1C9BQ31014091-F25DD15F-E520-48C3-A5F3-6E2C61045143Q31022233-02AB4643-7E77-40E5-9A53-42F43DA3D639Q33850072-8C0C5241-1933-499F-B8AE-9F643BF3189FQ34518864-52B99762-86A1-4617-8905-5400944534CFQ35197615-0E5951BE-233D-4BE5-8493-C306F3F3446AQ35197624-833B58FD-D753-46F6-9BF7-BFFF99B57292Q35787674-D2EB8DCB-D183-4C0D-A4EC-3FBC3963325AQ35924897-DF50B145-46B9-433C-93B9-2221E178F07BQ36094411-B875D79F-D53F-465F-90A9-FC7783619868Q36094858-351C0666-CDCC-4D51-AFBE-467B86B1B431Q36322552-06887C13-F801-4CB2-84A4-1E50C04DDE38Q36352573-F61FE0F8-335F-4C72-9FF8-EC03355944F3Q36572181-C426CAF7-0CBE-4F34-A12E-8AA46FD046F7Q36857038-5FB916B2-8EFC-4960-AE61-869E332E8D43Q37077503-1FA99864-44DA-40D4-AFEB-09A0E5AB2423Q37350601-8BB4B471-489B-40B6-AF2D-8DE614E10811Q37428916-BDB37030-7105-4654-BCD8-D8A21CA0DB3EQ37548585-B8CDBD08-3737-4A75-A03F-7689F20D28C7Q37563702-83A34ABB-DB44-4459-B49E-531ABC7DCC22Q37640002-8EF85B3A-E306-44CE-999F-E00A3BC8F676Q37706471-3248BE9C-5EDC-4E7B-B079-B9D18546DD66Q38209152-DF6E2120-B8CE-4E02-8223-6544C1FD1C49Q38375761-E25D7C9D-84CC-4FB4-A218-0895FAF07AB4Q38429935-64843FBF-90D4-417D-BCA0-4F96305BF1E8Q38601030-C6DED925-4A1B-43F5-A16B-FE9EB5568463Q38650152-B33C3533-FF8E-4C83-A5B6-C65F29193A6FQ39158216-7AE4B814-9563-48AD-9783-E81531794FF5Q39189244-FF73CE95-4AF5-45E6-813B-65645C16BF07Q39270263-1AF0A7EB-9E25-421B-81CB-3B48EA3C7904Q40311261-F74EDF40-1C78-4579-B68B-16E010B10EDEQ40590436-08F38249-E4EF-4F6A-BE64-C62D43CF0CCDQ41412739-FFC62D15-19B4-4394-BB51-EBE5307FD349Q41489230-AE1D83D2-4B73-46D6-8A6F-4DB27EB59D92Q41582696-D5C73F8A-53DA-4D71-989D-EF02F7ABF087Q42399661-DE81AC90-5B72-4A87-A46F-C3E2AA24BB37Q44348804-FE2D7A04-B824-4240-B6E8-C9D9F6137FB8
P2860
What determines patient satisfaction with surgery? A prospective cohort study of 4709 patients following total joint replacement.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
2013年论文
@zh
2013年论文
@zh-cn
name
What determines patient satisf ...... owing total joint replacement.
@ast
What determines patient satisf ...... owing total joint replacement.
@en
type
label
What determines patient satisf ...... owing total joint replacement.
@ast
What determines patient satisf ...... owing total joint replacement.
@en
prefLabel
What determines patient satisf ...... owing total joint replacement.
@ast
What determines patient satisf ...... owing total joint replacement.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
What determines patient satisf ...... owing total joint replacement.
@en
P2093
A H R W Simpson
D F Hamilton
D Macdonald
J T Patton
P2860
P356
10.1136/BMJOPEN-2012-002525
P577
2013-04-09T00:00:00Z